Bad Music, Good People / Good Music, Bad People

Country music star and current CMA Entertainer of the Year Luke Bryan may wear a million-watt smile anytime a camera is affixed on him, but his story is one of personal tragedy and perseverance. In 1996, when Bryan was days away from moving to Nashville to pursue a country music career, his brother Chris died unexpectedly in a car accident. Chris was 26-years-old at the time. Instead of moving to Nashville, Luke Bryan took a step back from the music to refocus on his family. He went to college at Georgia Southern and stuck around home before graduating in 1999. Eventually Luke did move to Nashville to pursue his dream, but only after he felt he’d met his obligations to his family.
Then in 2007, Luke Bryan’s sister Kelly died unexpectedly while she was at home. She was 39-years-old, and despite autopsies, her cause of death has never been determined. On top of that tragedy, Kelly’s husband, and Luke’s brother-in-law Ben Lee Cheshire died unexpectedly in November of 2014. This left the couple’s 13-year-old son Til as an orphan. In February of this year, Luke Bryan formally adopted Til into his family. Bryan had been taking care of Til ever since Ben’s death.
In July when Saving Country Music posted comments from Luke Bryan that questioned the character of country music “Outlaws” and characterized them as “laying in the gutter, strung out on drugs,” Luke Bryan personally called up members of the families of Willie Nelson, Merle Haggard, and Waylon Jennings (the three specific artists who’d been named) to personally apologize. Merle’s son Ben Haggard, Waylon’s widow Jessi Colter, and others received phone calls from the country star.
“He called to personally apologize to me and the Haggard family for his comments in a recent interview,” Ben Haggard said at the time. “I have never spoke to Luke in my life, but one thing was for sure, the sincerity in his voice. Let’s all remember (including myself) we’re all humans, we make mistakes and say things we wish we hadn’t.”
In May of 2012 Taylor Swift donated a whopping $4 million to the Country Music Hall of Fame and Museum in Nashville for the non-profit to open a new education center. Making the gift even more remarkable, at the time Taylor was already plotting to move from Nashville to New York, and from country to pop.
Taylor Swift remains one the most charitable celebrities in America, and not just in music, and not just in sheer numbers, but in per capita compared to her overall income. Taylor’s topped dosometing.org’s “Celebs Gone Good list” three years in a row.
Just last week, and for the second time in six months, Blake Shelton made headlines when he helped some folks stranded near his home in Oklahoma by pulling them out of a mud hole. It was one of many instances of Blake showing he’s willing to go out of his way to help others, including conducting a memorial for slain country artist Wayne Mills on The Voice, and recently speaking on the Cancer tragedy of country performer Joey Feek.
– – – – – – – – – – –
But of course, the quality of the music of these do-good artists can sometimes be an entirely different story than the quality of their character. Such an assessment is subjective mind you, both on the musical and personal side. But generally speaking, the generosity of a given celebrity and the standards of their music doesn’t always go hand in hand.
Upon occasion Saving Country Music will have some not very nice things to say about a certain artist’s music. Sometimes this is met with strident rebuttals from specific fans citing the artist’s track record for supporting the troops, giving to charitable causes, or other such personal stories that are offered up as if to absolve these performers from any criticism concerning their creative output.
The truth is most celebrities, especially in mainstream country music, tend to be pretty good people. And they all give to charities, and usually in ample portions. Not to besmirch their charitable efforts, but under the current American tax system, many celebrities choose to give to charities because in the end it’s an expense that can be written off, while the donation buys positive press and loyalty among fans. Country music fans especially seem to want to feel like they’re supporting celebrities who are good people beyond the stage, and many times this factors in to whom they deem to be their favorite performers.
But stellar character is not always the case with country artists. Jason Aldean, for example, has shown on numerous occasions what would be considered quite questionable decision making, whether cavorting with other women while married, or wearing blackface on Halloween. Yet to shun Jason Aldean for certain actions in his personal life would be a bit hypocritical for some fans of classic and traditional country music.
Though the listening public will quibble over any perceived personal failing from a music celebrity these days, the stars from years ago exhibited all manner of bad behavior and poor decision making on a regular basis—stuff today that probably would get them completely expelled from showbiz. From the domestic violence of Willie Nelson, to the drug abuse of Waylon Jennings, Johnny Cash, and George Jones, to the violent behavior by Spade Cooley and Johnny Paycheck, and the politically-incorrect language of David Allan Coe, country music is full of troubling stories and troubled characters.
Nonetheless, many “real” country music fans would much rather listen to the music of these previously-mentioned artists as opposed to the music of Luke Bryan, Taylor Swift, or Blake Shelton. In fact much of the bad behavior of legendary country artists is the stuff of country music legend itself.
There’s people, and then there’s music, and it’s always important to separate the two, especially when bringing strong disapproval against someone’s music. Music criticism is not always a commentary on personal character, nor should it be taken that way.
This is especially true in the era of social network, where music fans are more and more exhibiting a strange version of musical tribalism like never before. A certain artist, or a certain scene might breed such undying loyalty in an artist or band, the fans will unilaterally defend that artist no matter what the offense in their personal life. They will justify bad behavior by citing good music, or justify bad music with good behavior.
Some fans will use how an artist treats their fans, or treats others as a reason to either approve or disapprove of their music. But many of the best musicians tend to be right-brained, socially awkward individuals with personal demons aplenty. That’s what gives these artist the type of personal experiences and insight to make their music so compelling. That also may be one of the reasons so much of the music from mainstream artists feels so uninspired and formulaic—because today’s mainstream country artists are so balanced and convivial, and any major crises or moments of catharsis that come through their music must be manufactured.
But you can’t always assume this. Luke Bryan’s music may comes across as mostly whitewashed, syrupy, palatable-to-the-masses fluff, but that doesn’t mean his own life hasn’t been dogged by personal tragedy, or even struggle at times.
In the end, people must come first, and then music.
November 18, 2015 @ 7:46 pm
My god
Great job
November 18, 2015 @ 7:52 pm
I think it is important as a music fan to not let what an artist does, says or believes get in the way of your enjoyment of their music. If it adds to it, good….but don’t let the negatives get in the way of you enjoying a song that has nothing to do with that. That being said, if their believes, actions or whatever that you don’t like starts to bleed into their music…by all means, call it out and consider not listening anymore. But until then, just listen to music you think is good.
November 19, 2015 @ 9:38 am
Why didn’t someone tell my dumb teen/early 20s self this?
I agree with what you’re saying and Trigger too, and I think you can also like not care for song A cause it’s too whatever to you but still like all of the other songs and stuff.
November 18, 2015 @ 7:55 pm
Thanks Trigger. A very important distinction is laid out here. Critique the music, not the person. I’ve followed your blog for some time and cringe when the name-calling starts. I suspect 99.9% of your readers have never met the artists they demean and dismiss so quickly. Seems to be the way of today — politics, religion, music — ‘if we don’t have shared experiences and you don’t agree with my ideas or preferences, you are an idiot’. Sad times.
November 18, 2015 @ 7:57 pm
Great points that people seem to need to be reminded of too often.
Just because you don’t like a performer’s music does not make that performer a bad person.
It can’t be said enough that we don’t really know these people. At all. Criticize or praise the music, yes, but to draw any greater conclusions about a performer’s true character is really pathetic.
November 18, 2015 @ 8:16 pm
bizarre that you make an article about this, as its something I’ve thought about for years, and I thought no one else thought about this kinda thing lol
November 18, 2015 @ 8:55 pm
Outstanding article !
November 18, 2015 @ 8:30 pm
Great Article Trigger! I like to judge the music too; not the person. I like Luke Bryan but I don’t care some of his music same thing to Jason Aldean, Brad Paisley, Toby Keith, Carrie Underwood, Blake, Miranda, Etc…
November 18, 2015 @ 8:38 pm
Blake Shelton also rescued a man stranded in the Oklahoma floods earlier this year, in addition to helping those teens in the mud.
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2015/06/20/country-star-blake-shelton-rescues-man-stranded-in-flood/
November 18, 2015 @ 8:45 pm
Thanks for this…I had no idea.
November 18, 2015 @ 9:42 pm
I hate all their music as much as the next guy that reads this site, but way to shed light on things a lot of people don’t know. Well done. Human beings first, then musical “talents”
November 18, 2015 @ 9:45 pm
Screw that nonsense. Luke Bryan is evil incarnate. No amount of propaganda will change my mind.
On a serious note, there are a lot of artists, from differing genres, who I don’t really like their music, but through interviews, mainly podcasts, have come to appreciate them as human beings. Their music may still suck, but that should not detract from the person.
Nice article.
November 18, 2015 @ 9:50 pm
I need to go back to be a country music fan instead of criticized singers. I should Criticize the music if it was bad or good. Country singers or and other genre (country is my thing). I like most of mainstream country singers but sometimes they sing not to good songs. Thanks Trigger for the article don’t attack the singers but attack the bad music.
November 18, 2015 @ 10:16 pm
And then you have rarer specimens like Chris Stapleton, Lee Ann Womack and Kellie Pickler: good people AND good entertainers! =)
November 19, 2015 @ 11:55 am
Sturgill Simpson also though maybe we haven’t seen his demons yet.
And also probably the holy trinity Dolly, Loretta, Emmylou…
November 18, 2015 @ 10:17 pm
Fantastic article. In music, as in politics, personal attacks should always be left out (especially in music, since we are just debating about art, not about policies that materially affect people’s lives). The belief in the fallacy of the ad hominem argument should always be foremost on the mind of any writer or commenter.
It might be a good idea to write a similar article about music and intelligence, since it is unfortunately all too common to attack those with different musical tastes as “dumb”.
Just a quick correction: artists in general tend to be right-brained, not left-brained. Problems like addiction and extreme emotions are disproportionately prevalent in strongly right-brained individuals.
November 18, 2015 @ 10:32 pm
Amen to all you said, and I second that music fan/intelligence article proposal! =)
November 18, 2015 @ 10:29 pm
Jason Aldean’s personal actions make me cringe more than any other A-list entertainer, yet I regularly stand by my assertion that when it comes to full-length albums (not just singles, which he generally makes poor decisions)………….he is above-average among A-listers and knows how to,pick songs with some degree of nuance and emotional release.
In contrast, I think Luke Bryan is much more likeable than Aldean and most other male A-listers, yet I haven’t liked any of his single releases going all the way back to “We Rode In Trucks”. And “To The Moon And Back” is the only song of his I strongly like since his debut album.
In addition, I think Carrie Underwood is very friendly and great to her fans. Yet, I’m not able to get into her music nearly as much as I’d like. I consider her new album quite mediocre and a misleading reprise of her usual schtick, of which only two songs truly impressed me to some degree. In contrast, Miranda Lambert has usually struck me as less friendly (though she is time to time) but I regard as releasing much more quality material than Carrie (though she made terrible single selections with “Platinum”).
*
In the end, I’ll never hesitate to call those I generally like on instances of stupidity to outright crassness, just as I’ll never hesitate to give the work among those I generally dislike personally credit where it is due.
November 18, 2015 @ 11:25 pm
Excellent point about Miranda and Carrie. Miranda is probably one of the strongest examples of why we should separate judgments on music from judgments on personal behavior. Here’s someone who is widely regarded as both the least likeable and the most talented major female country artist.
November 18, 2015 @ 10:45 pm
Great article, I never would have looked at the subject in that manner. Thanks for bringing it out in a new light. Regardless of the good old boys behaviors, I’ll always be a classic country fan.
November 18, 2015 @ 11:04 pm
Nice job.
November 18, 2015 @ 11:09 pm
Luke Bryan could have a lot to say in his music if he wanted to, and deep down, I think he DOES want to. I think he was willing to sell out so bad in order to make his family proud by being rich and successful. Maybe he wanted to fill the void in his life and heal some of his pain by becoming as successful and as famous as possible. It’s not popular to play deep music right now, because for whatever reason, that’s not what people be jammin’ in their trucks to. It’s also possible that singing about loss or even deep subjects is too painful, so he sings shallow party songs as a way to escape and not think about it. But I think that will actually make it more painful in the long run. Without actually dealing with the pain, it will continue to haunt him his whole life. He may also realize that all of his music is crap, he has become a laughing stock, damaged country music, and never said a great message in his music, and that may hurt him. Luke clearly has a lot of pain for a lot of reasons. I think if Luke would take a more introspective approach to his next album, exposing his vulnerabilities in a way that lets him confront them make powerful music out of it, while also embracing the more traditional country oriented sound that he really does love since he can sing anything and have it go to #1 now, not only will he make country fans of all kinds happy and possibly have the best period of his career, it will also give Luke a more satisfying and fulfilling life. Sorry, I’m a psychology major, so I like to psychoanalyze:)
November 19, 2015 @ 2:37 am
“Luke Bryan could have a lot to say in his music if he wanted to, and deep down, I think he DOES want to. I think he was willing to sell out so bad in order to make his family proud by being rich and successful. Maybe he wanted to fill the void in his life and heal some of his pain by becoming as successful and as famous as possible. It”™s not popular to play deep music right now, because for whatever reason, that”™s not what people be jammin”™ in their trucks to. It”™s also possible that singing about loss or even deep subjects is too painful, so he sings shallow party songs as a way to escape and not think about it. But I think that will actually make it more painful in the long run. Without actually dealing with the pain, it will continue to haunt him his whole life. He may also realize that all of his music is crap, he has become a laughing stock, damaged country music, and never said a great message in his music, and that may hurt him. Luke clearly has a lot of pain for a lot of reasons. I think if Luke would take a more introspective approach to his next album, exposing his vulnerabilities in a way that lets him confront them make powerful music out of it, while also embracing the more traditional country oriented sound that he really does love since he can sing anything and have it go to #1 now, not only will he make country fans of all kinds happy and possibly have the best period of his career, it will also give Luke a more satisfying and fulfilling life. Sorry, I”™m a psychology major, so I like to psychoanalyze:) ”
This not only makes good sense but is the reason an artist wants to be an artist . By recording only marketable , forgettable , safe, throwaway crap music ( and calling it ‘ country music ‘ ) the ” artist ” is denying whatever inkling of creativity and passion about his own life experiences he may be harboring. LB is a good example . This guy has some experience a lot of people could relate to …people of ALL ages . Perhaps he isn’t capable of expressing those experiences in a lyric . Perhaps he chooses not to and just wants to get rich . In any case , if you are calling yourself an ‘artist’ …BE AN ARTIST ! Be honest with your art whatever it may be . Express yourself and your experiences and views and perspectives through your art. LB is no more an ‘artist’ than my mailman . He’s doing a job that he can make a living at -GREAT living at -without having to risk anything personally , emotionally , financially or otherwise as long as he tows the company line . Sure , he ‘s probably a nice guy , a good neighbor , family man , friend , son etc. And so is my mailman , I’m sure . But my mailman isn’t fucking up a musical genre with crap songs that have little or nothing to do with that genre and claiming he’s an artist . And he isn’t ‘ selling his delivery services’ by wagging his ass in my face and smiling every time he drops a hydro bill in the box. He’s just doing his job ….delivering the mail . LB and so many others are just doing their jobs according to the job description the company has outlined . He has a right to make a living .He DOESN”T have a right to call himself an artist or call his music ‘ country music ‘ just to have a place to hawk it unless he’s expressing HIS life experiences as they may relate to people as a reflection or observation of THEIRS . Nice guy …..shit music . So ?
November 19, 2015 @ 7:42 am
Luke has sang a song in regards to the lost of his brother. “Drink a Beer”.
November 18, 2015 @ 11:13 pm
Very good points on both sides of the coin.
November 18, 2015 @ 11:19 pm
Loved this article. Great way to shed some positive light. Sometimes I get tired of all the negative energy on this site regarding artists ike Luke Bryan or Blake Shelton. Nice to take a step back and see the good things that these people do. Things that actually matter in the grand scheme of things. Thanks Trig!
November 18, 2015 @ 11:24 pm
I admit to being judgmental at times. I once tastelessly suggested that Blake beats or threatens Miranda as a way to justify Miranda never taking a stand against Bro-Country, not even realizing how uncalled for that was. That caused some drama on here on that article. I felt bad about it when I heard about their divorce. Thing is, I really hate cheaters. I just can’t stand it when somebody marries somebody only to cheat on them later, and I know Blake cheated on his last wife with Miranda, and probably cheated on her too. I can forgive him for the Old Farts comment, but cheating his hard to get past. I forget that everybody makes mistakes. Jason Aldean really is an a$$hole though. There is a whole lot of evidence to corroborate this assertion.
November 18, 2015 @ 11:36 pm
One of my strongest beliefs is that one can never REALLY know what is going on in another person’s marriage. I believe this is true even with close friends and family members and it is definitely true of total strangers and celebrities (who are total strangers really) so to make proclamations about someone else is really perilous and should only be done with great caution and not just from reading Taste Of Country.
As I said above we don’t know these people and no matter how many interviews you read or watch it doesn’t mean that you know what is going on behind closed doors.
November 19, 2015 @ 12:03 am
“no matter how many interviews you read or watch it doesn’t mean that you know what is going on behind closed doors”
Exactly.
Charlie Rich summarized it rather nicely:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJYGR1gw-5s
November 19, 2015 @ 12:40 am
Earlier today I was listening to Raul Malo and Sturgill Simpson sing Crying. As much as I love Malo’s voice there is something dirty about Simpsons voice. He makes you feel the song where Malo makes you want to listen to the song….I honestly think if you gave Luke Bryant a straight up country song he would do wonders with it….will that ever happen who knows but he does have the voice for it.
November 19, 2015 @ 3:31 am
Although not a fan of his music I have heard Kenny Chesney is a good guy. I have also heard many stories about Blake Shelton not being a very nice guy at all. There are some very disturbing rumors about him making the rounds in Nashville.
November 19, 2015 @ 6:45 am
There were a couple of very good country songs on his “I’ll Stay Me” album released in 2007. They showed loads of promise but unfortunately Luke did not repeat that on any subsequent album releases. Pretty sure that he’s a very decent man but he deserted any pretense to be a country music singer a long time ago.
November 19, 2015 @ 11:17 am
The irony of that release’s title is not lost.
November 19, 2015 @ 6:50 am
I’m from Southwest, Ga like Luke is. And I have some friends who are good friends with him. Luke Bryan is a great guy, he just loves making crappy music to make more money. He takes care of his family and friends back home. I sometimes see his dad at our local dive bar in Albany.
He said Luke came back home a couple of months ago and played some new songs off his record to some family and friends and he asked a little girl that was there what she thought and she said they sounded all the same. So, I think he knows his music isn’t what it can be, but the money is too good right now.
November 19, 2015 @ 11:23 am
“….. he asked a little girl that was there what she thought and she said they sounded all the same…..”
See . I KNEW Nashville was using little girls as their test demographic .But no ….everyone keeps saying they are older 14 and 15 year old girls these songs are written for .
November 19, 2015 @ 4:03 pm
That’s your takeaway from that anecdote? C’mon.
The real lesson is that little girls are far more discerning than the 14/15 year old girls Nashville is writing for, because they won’t get distracted by Luke Bryan’s ass.
November 19, 2015 @ 7:12 am
While I think music matters it easy sometimes to forget that because someone does something we don’t like that doesn’t necessarily make them a bad person. People get caught up in their own opinion.After hearing about all the tragedy in Luke Bryan ‘s life I can see why party songs could be an escape.Nice work Trig!!
November 19, 2015 @ 7:48 am
I’m amazed at the amount of people on here defending these jokers.
We’re dealing with grown men who sing about adolescents, trucks, and things we all should have outgrown by the time we turned 25. We’re dealing with grown men who act like children and insult people who disagree with them. These are grown men with families acting like entitled 17 year olds, lying to the American people about their music, and dressing up as Lil’ Wayne. 15 year old kids think Lil’ Wayne is cool, anybody over thirty should have grown into more mature things.
Why are we defending their personalities?
And on the Luke Bryan thing: if he’s truly suffered through all this that makes him all the worse because he’s still a forty year-old creeper who sings about spring break when he could be doing something meaningful. GROW UP LUKE BRYAN.
November 19, 2015 @ 7:55 am
And these same grown men (Tyler Farr) think drunk driving is acceptable, underage drinking is okay, and shouting homophobic stuff in public is okay!
November 19, 2015 @ 10:09 am
I wasn’t defending their “personalities” or even them as people necessarily. What I was trying to point out is that even if we don’t like someone’s music, that doesn’t immediately make them a horrible person. I’m not defending “shouting homophobic stuff in public.” I’m just saying that if I ran into Luke Bryan, I wouldn’t spit in his face just because he cut “Kick The Dust Up.”
November 19, 2015 @ 10:43 am
It’s not about how bad his music is, it’s about how bad HE is as an artist. This is a grown man who thinks its okay to tell impressionable youth to drink to excess and objectify women, and that stupid tweet of him drunk driving his truck into a lake is a great example. He’d be a terrible role model if he’d cut “Take These Chains From My Heart” instead of “Kick the Dust Up.” The primary difference between this airhead and Cash, Jennings and Jones is that those guys grew up and went on file telling people NOT to do what they did. Plus they were decent people most of the time.
November 19, 2015 @ 11:22 am
https://www.savingcountrymusic.com/luke-bryan-taylor-swift-lead-stars-with-worst-vocal-ranges
I’ve never forgotten this post. To this day when I hear the various artists, I listen to their range. Luke’s range is one of the flattest I’ve ever heard and yet, he keeps topping the charts. It sounds like two or three notes.
November 19, 2015 @ 12:16 pm
To go a step farther we have to look at the goals of why artists get into music or stardom in the first place. Each person has their own idea of success. Artist A may want to just write and play the best music he can for the local people or himself. Artist B wants to just do cover songs his whole life in a local band, nothing original. Artist C wants to be a major independent but make his own music. Artist D wants to just hear his song on the radio, reporting station or not to get the fullmollment of others and himself. Artist E wants to be a major super star. At each level you may have to give up things such as personal choice or power, while others depend on you. Your singles or record may be out of your own control since others heavily invested in you.
This was a great article. Always try to look at the music of the artist first whether I like it or not. If it’s bad the secondary criteria may come into play a little more. It certainly isn’t a determining factor though.
November 19, 2015 @ 1:03 pm
This makes me sad for the career Luke could have had if he’d chosen to sing about HIS life instead of some 20 year old frat kid’s.
November 19, 2015 @ 1:27 pm
That is a good point. He must not be able to cut it as a songwriter.
November 19, 2015 @ 2:17 pm
I used to think this too. However, he’s had unthinkable tragedies happen to him- I get that he doesn’t want to sing half a dozen songs about it on stage every night. People respond to in different ways. I don’t love most of his party songs, but I also don’t fault him for wanting to share the worst moments of his life on every radio station in the country and at every concert.
November 20, 2015 @ 4:02 pm
I do understand and don’t want to trivialize what’s happened to him – yet part of me wants to say “that’s country music.” He’s in the one profession where tragedy can become something, well not positive, but something cathartic. Something that can comfort and inspire other people who’ve gone through something similar. I feel like that’s what country music was founded on.
I’m not saying he should rehash his grief in song if that isn’t healing for him – I guess I’d just hope for *some* personal insights from someone who’s been through what he has. At least more insight than, “I got that real good feel good stuff under the seat of my big black jacked up truck.”
November 19, 2015 @ 2:22 pm
Surprised you didn’t mention Stoney LaRue’s incident or Josh Abbott’s cheating here. I’m glad you posted this article. I see you get mistakenly faulted on here for attacking their lives every now and then. I also see others in comments judge them as people based off their music. This article should clear all of this up. Judging someone good or bad based off their music isn’t fair.
November 20, 2015 @ 8:01 am
Good music, bad people: Mark Kozelek, Kasey Anderson, Kanye (not a huge fan personally, but he has talent), Morissey (some people consider his music good)
November 21, 2015 @ 3:01 pm
In before Farce the Music makes a post mocking this article.
November 21, 2015 @ 3:38 pm
Actually, it was Farce that suggested I write it. It was something I’d been thinking about for a long time and mentioned in passing, but deserved to be set in stone.
December 2, 2015 @ 11:53 am
I find that hard to believe, given how three-quarters of his stuff is ad hominem attacks against artists and their fans.
Look that his blog posts on Justin Moore. Roughly 1% is about his music, while the remaining 99% is mean-spirited jokes about his height.
November 21, 2015 @ 9:57 pm
Amen.
November 23, 2015 @ 6:06 am
I’m looking at this in a different way and applying it to a completely different genre of entertainment-that of comedian (disclaimer-I don’t like comedians, at least in regards to stand-up comedy, in the first place, period. Disclaimer is primarily because I loved Lucille Ball in “I Love Lucy” and Bing and Bob in the road movies. Can’t stand Jerry Lewis as a comedian, though he did do that telethon thing for muscular dystrophy for years.)
OK, having set this up-Sandra Bernhard-I never thought much of her as a comedian, but even if she could make me laugh till I cried, I’d never listen to/watch her again as long as I live after the terrible, awful thing she wished upon Sarah Palin-that if she ever showed her face in NYC, Bernhard would have her “black brothers” gang-rape Palin. I wasn’t surprised that no one on the left (I’m looking at you NOW) chastised her for wishing rape upon a political opponent, but even I was surprised that the left didn’t chastise her for upholding what’s considered by the left to be one of the worst stereotypes of black males, that they’re marauding rapists who would even commit rape at the bidding of a white woman who calls them “brother”. Even if they didn’t take issue with her wishing rape upon Palin, you’d think they’d have taken issue with her implication that the black males she knows would be willing to rape at the bidding of a white woman just because another white woman has different political views.
This is one of the few cases in which I will never be able to separate the person from their “day job”. That was a horrible thing to say, on more than one level.
If an entertainer with views on the right of the political spectrum said such a thing, I’d feel the same way and boycott them forever.