Don’t Let Grammy Drama Overshadow The Gravity of the Awards
If you want the latest saucy details on the scandal rocking the Grammy Awards and their suspended CEO, sorry to disappoint. That’s not what this is going to be. In fact a significant part of the problem here has been how the media is exacerbating the situation by sharing leaks, sensationalizing already sensational unverified accusations, and in some cases, spreading what will likely be proven in the future to be outright lies in order to siphon as many clicks out of this story while being gamed by both sides.
Most everyone is swept up in choosing what side to be on in this situation and making sure their side wins like so often happens in these politically polarized times, as opposed to seeing the forest for the trees and letting the facts come out in a cool-minded approach. And it’s not just enough to claim victory over one’s adversary in debates on issues where a mutual respect still persists after the dust settles. One’s ideological foes must be completely vanquished and wiped off the face of the earth. And in the case of this Grammy fracas, it seems few if anyone is thinking about the music itself, or the artists who on Sunday will get the opportunity to experience something they’ve dreamed of happening from the first time they chose to pursue music, which is hearing their name called to receive a Grammy Award.
And no, this isn’t just about the Lil Nas X’s, Billie Eilish’s, and other big names of the music world who get to enjoy their moment during the television broadcast. This includes dozens of artists in regional music and niche genres, songwriters and composers, instrumentalists, people who’ve devoted their entire lives to music, and whose only opportunity to walk away with an award of merit for their efforts is from the Recording Academy. There are 84 award categories in total, not to mention that within the major categories, it’s not always the commercial powerhouses, but the critical achievers who receive an opportunity to win. And this says nothing about the importance that simply receiving a Grammy nomination can have for the career of a performer.
Let’s not to take anything away from the gravity of the charges suspended CEO Deborah Dugan has brought against the Recording Academy. These accusations should be taken seriously, thoroughly investigated, and addressed in a very public and transparent manner. But in Dugan’s effort to get a leg up on the Recording Academy in a short-term public relations issue, she and her surrogates lost focus on the long-term effects, as have the Grammys at moments in this ordeal during the heated and hurried back and forths. This issue has been handled like a divorce with bloodthirsty lawyers, not an Human Resources issue at a storied, non-profit institution. But The Recording Academy made an initial move to allegedly protect one of their employees from serious harassment, which is their legal obligation to do, and immediately launched a third party investigation which everyone should have waited for the results of before feeding the press salacious details in hopes of gaining advantage over the other in the court of public opinion.
If Deborah Dugan was in the right, eventually this would have been revealed, and her accuser and/or the Grammy Awards would be obligated to make it right to her. If Deborah Dugan wanted to back stop her side of the story, she could launch her own investigation and lawsuit on the back end as opposed to doing it publicly in order to put pressure on the Grammy Awards in the short term, and undermine Sunday’s presentation. Deborah Dugan has attempted to tear down the entire 60-year-old organization and sow doubt in everything that is “Grammy” to save face personally, sullying the reverence of what it means for these artists to receive a Grammy, either this year or in years previous. And many are rooting her on simply because they align politically with what they believe to be her ideology, even though the Grammy Awards are a decidedly left-leaning organization themselves. Now, some artists may even feel embarrassed if their name is called for a Grammy Award on Sunday, or at least conflicted. Taylor Swift has canceled a surprise appearance on the show due to the controversy (and leaked that info to the press so she can get credit for standing up against them for her own public relations win).
But none of this changes the fact that the Grammy Awards continue to be the only organization that regularly gets it mostly right when it comes to handing out accolades, putting critical performance over popularity, making sure most every facet of recorded music is included, and generally, not allowing race, gender, sexual orientation, or anything else to enter into the picture. If anything, the Grammy Awards are weighted unfairly towards minorities and the marginalized in 2020. Destroying all of that just because you want to get back at the Grammy Awards in public is unprofessional, selfish, and incredibly shortsighted. Deborah Dugan was not fired. She was suspended pending an investigation. Perhaps the Recording Academy could have figured out a better way to handle the situation as opposed to making the move right before the awards. But Deborah Dugan has gone beyond the pale with her accusations. If former CEO Neil Portnow was raping artists, Dugan needed to call the police, not race to the press in order to influence a pending third party investigation and public opinion.
The Grammy Awards got woke by hiring Deborah Dugan in the first place, and now they’re arguably in the biggest hot water in their 60 year history. That’s what happens when you succumb to politically-oriented bullies. If they sense you are pliable and apt to comply, they push more and more until its their ideology that reigns like an autocracy over your actions. And if you don’t willfully succumb to their every demand, they will work to destroy you. Canceled. Burn the entire institution to the ground, regardless of the greater ramifications or collateral damage. Everything is in play, and no holds are barred. This is the approach Deborah Dugan took. Where her presence within the Grammy organization could have been vital in rooting out whatever legitimate corruption or discrimination she found, she now wants us to throw the baby out with the bathwater, regardless of the qualifying points she may pepper between her accusations.
Is there corruption embedded within the Grammy Awards process? There is a good chance there is. Trying to find incorruptible men and women in the music business is harder than it is in the Mexican political system. The music business is rife with conflicts of interest, especially since the Recording Academy is a peer-run and voted-on organization, meaning instead of objective third parties choosing who is eligible for awards, it’s fellow artists, producers, and other industry professionals. But compared to something like country music’s ACM Awards, or other awards presenters like the American Music Awards that are television productions that put popularity first, the Recording Academy is the best thing we have, and should be respected as an institution, radically reformed if necessary, but most importantly, protected by all people who care about music, especially from the personal vendetta of anyone, whether it’s a popular artist who feels they’ve been wronged by losing an award, or an embattled CEO who can’t stand to see her name reflected negatively in the press, and decides to go scorched earth.
It meant something when Kacey Musgraves won the Grammy for Album of the Year in 2019. It meant something when Brandi Carlile won three Grammys in the often-overlooked American Roots categories before taking the stage and delivering a memorable performance in front of a huge television audience. Yola is up for four Grammys on Sunday, and if she wins, it will mean something as well. And regardless of what is going on behind-the-scenes, these wins and nominations already represent a diversity in music that is unparalleled and should be commended as opposed to second guessed at every turn.
Music still must remain a meritocracy, and one of the things about calls for diversity and inclusiveness is that they will never be fulfilled completely. Making sure that everyone is given equal opportunity to win awards must always be insisted upon. But don’t destroy what receiving a Grammy Award means to these artists, and means to music, just because we live in a moment where political vitriol is boiling over into cultural institutions like the Grammy Awards like never before. Commit to fixing whatever problems may present themselves as opposed to tearing an entire institution down that has 60 years of revered legacy shining a spotlight on those in music that actually deserve it.
January 25, 2020 @ 12:39 pm
Trig, can you confirm Tyler Childers will not be in attendance? I believe he is currently touring overseas?
January 25, 2020 @ 1:54 pm
I cannot confirm it, but I don’t expect it. Since Country Song is likely to be handed out before the telecast, there’s not a lot of reason for him to be there, though I’m sure he’ll have someone there in the crowd on his behalf. But who knows, maybe he’ll fly in.
January 25, 2020 @ 6:26 pm
He landed in LA today, according to his Facebook posts. Hell of a travel schedule!
January 25, 2020 @ 10:08 pm
Yea, just saw that. Oslo to LA, and back to Berlin for a Monday show. Crazy
January 25, 2020 @ 2:43 pm
This is very thoughtful and well written.
January 25, 2020 @ 4:24 pm
Oh man, i’m just going to jump into the fray.
Will apologize for the length of this text, now.
Sorry.
I am sick – to – death, of all the women who cry wolf, weeks, months, years, after a supposed sexual incident.
Let’s take Harvey Wenstein for example.
I do not believe even one “actress” wannabe, who had his head between their legs, while sitting on the side of a hot tub, or WHEREVER, didn’t know EXACTLY what was going on. They let him in there, HOWEVER, because Baby?, he was going to make them a star!!!
You don’t want some guy in there? It’s YOUR job to keep him out.
Period.
Hands down.
At 5′ 1″, have had my share of different situations, worldwide.
Am i special? Not in the least.
Do i have integrity? In spades. Am i a lady? You bet your a**.
Almost all males and females will have uncomfortable situations arise within their lifetimes.
Battery, assault, rape, not good on any level. And this is not what is being referred to.
Blatant, manipulative, hurtful, hateful, accusation’s need to stop.
Do these women perpetrating these crimes, know how stupid they look?
January 26, 2020 @ 7:54 am
You should have apologized for the inanity of what you were about to post.
January 25, 2020 @ 5:18 pm
Ashley Judd said no. Weinstein ruined her career. THAT is why actresses don’t speak up against a man with as much power as Weinstein had.
January 26, 2020 @ 2:13 am
That hasn’t been proved in court.
January 25, 2020 @ 6:08 pm
Hmmm, so the answer is, go ahead and whore yourself out?
January 25, 2020 @ 7:50 pm
No the answer is don’t judge victims when you don’t understand their situation.
January 25, 2020 @ 8:03 pm
Not judging anyone.
That is not my place
January 25, 2020 @ 8:37 pm
I could go through your original post and point out all the times you judged the victims but I don’t have enough time right now.
January 25, 2020 @ 9:04 pm
Nor the intellect
January 25, 2020 @ 9:22 pm
Oh for fucks’ sake.
“I do not believe any wannabe “actress”
“They will let him in there, because baby he was going to make them a star.”
“You don’t want him in there, it’s your job to keep him out.”
Etc.
You are the judgier than the misogynist guys trolling Twitter on this topic, which is extra disappointing coming from a woman.
January 25, 2020 @ 6:47 pm
I don’t know. To me, the Grammy’s has always been about making statements and leans towards political underpinnings, mostly to the left. Never had much credibility to me. This under-the-table dealing doesn’t surprise me in the least.
January 25, 2020 @ 7:36 pm
That part of the story doesn’t surprise me either. Almost none of the albums I would consider the best have ever even been nominated. When they are it’s the exception to the rule. I haven’t paid attention in probably 20 years, which is about when I figured that out.
January 25, 2020 @ 7:59 pm
Yes. Kind of like searching for a good apple in a garbage dump. It isn’t worth the trip.
January 25, 2020 @ 7:30 pm
Most people are going to watch the Grammys for 1. Live debut of Gwen and Blake duet 2. Ariana Grande. 3. What people are wearing. (Lizzo and Billie Eilish have been on so many shows they are a little played out…) This is an important issue but I think mostly important to entertainment industry people…
January 31, 2020 @ 2:37 am
Oh God no! Haha! You couldn’t pay me to watch that crap, especially for the 3 examples that you gave! If you want proof how low pop music has fallen to, watch the Grammys!
January 25, 2020 @ 10:06 pm
Thank you Trig. I don’t always agree with you but son when you’re on you’re on. Brilliant article. You could tell how excited the artists are to be nominated. Whether you like them or not. And this poorly handled clusterf**k has overshadowed the music, the artists. Everything you wrote was spot on.
January 26, 2020 @ 6:23 am
I haven’t taken the Grammys serious since the whole Millie Vannillie thing. Lizzo in all of her rotundness will be taking home most of the major awards. one more reason not to take them serious.
January 26, 2020 @ 7:00 am
I can only assume you are the perfect picture of a hard-bodied fitness guru? Heck, in reality, the last time you saw your own pecker was probably 1987.
January 27, 2020 @ 6:28 am
Intellect is not your strong point. Good thing you avoided it.
January 26, 2020 @ 9:13 am
Competition in Art makes it Sport.
January 26, 2020 @ 9:21 am
There is a difference between competition and recognition.
January 31, 2020 @ 2:38 am
If you campaign for an award, it’s a competition. Most campaign for Grammys.
January 26, 2020 @ 10:50 am
Following Dugan’s allegations of a corrupt nomination process, I have a pretty hard time agreeing that the awards are meaningful and that we should focus on the winners accomplishments.
Rigged Grammy nominations:
The 44-page complaint details ‘egregious conflicts of interest, improper self-dealing by Board members and voting irregularities with respect to nominations for Grammy Awards’.
Dugan alleges that nomination review committees oversee the award categories and rig the system in favor of artists, record labels and management firms that members have business deals with. Many of those members represent or have relationships with artists and manipulate who ends up nominated, she claims.
‘Rather than promoting a transparent nomination process the Board has decided to shroud the process in secrecy, and ultimately controls, in large part, who is nominated for Grammy Awards,’ the complaint says.
Just last year Ed Sheeran and Ariana Grande had top 100 hits with their hits Perfect and Thank U Next, but both missed Song of the Year nominations despite raking in enough votes.
For the top four awards, committees select the final nominees from the top 20 contenders, based off ballots from its voting members. But the complaint said the committee members sometimes include artists who did not make it in the top 20 because of their personal or business relationships with those artists.
‘This year, 30 artists that were not selected by the membership were added to the possible nomination list,’ the complaint read.
She added that the board manipulates the process to ensure certain songs or albums are nominated if the show’s producer wants a specific performance to be included for the show.
‘The Board also manipulates the nominations process to ensure that certain songs or albums are nominated when the producer of the Grammys (Ken Ehrlich) wants a particular song performed on the show,’ it adds.
She says the nomination system was so egregious, artists were permitted to sit on nomination committees.
‘Moreover, in an outrageous conflict of interest, the Board has selected artists who are under consideration for a nomination to sit on the committee that is voting for the category for which that have been nominated. As a result, one artist who initially ranked 18 out of 20 in the 2019 ‘Song of the Year’ category ended up with a nomination. This artist was actually permitted to sit on the ‘Song of the Year’ nomination committee. Incredibly, this artist is also represented by a member of the Board,’ the complaint states.
The Recording Academy has not commented on the voting irregularity allegations.
January 26, 2020 @ 2:34 pm
Dungan’s allegations are just that: allegations. And this all started when a woman brought allegations against Dugan for being aggressively harassing in the workplace, something any organization must take seriously in this litigious era. Dugan got suspended, not fired, launched a 3rd party investigation, and she went scorched earth.
As I said in the article, I think Dugan’s allegations should be taken seriously and be investigated. I also believe there likely is a level of corruption in the Grammy Awards due to how its a peer-driven organization, meaning artists and producers make many of the decisions. But that doesn’t mean the artists who’ve won them in the past, or will win them in the future do not deserve them. Deborah Dugan put herself before the music and the institution, and that’s not fair to the artists, or the community.
January 26, 2020 @ 10:53 am
Presenting some country radio drama right now….
Heartache Medication officially is done at radio as of later tonight with a peak of #2 on mediabase and Billboard charts, blocked by the Pop Country Boyfriend hit, “10,000 Hours” by Justin Bieber And Dan + Shay (I put Justin’s name first because he’s probably the real reason this song shot up so quickly on the charts …)
January 26, 2020 @ 12:09 pm
man …that ‘heartache medication’ thing was the ultimate example of making a mountain from a molehill ,musically speaking imo , ….happy its had its run .
sure…..it sounds retro …….and ok …that’s a step in the right direction . but as a song i don’t think it would have stood a chance back in the day . it comes across as being too desperate and inauthentic . and that voice …..soooo annoyiing .
January 26, 2020 @ 1:37 pm
In my opinion, Instrumentally the song is gorgeous. The lyrics were ok, a tad cliche.
But To me, Heartache Medication is the 2nd coming of “Friends in low Places”. Just a good, country, boot stomping fun anthem!! Instrumentally it’s the most “country ” thing to do well at radio in the past 8 years or so. We all should be supporting the sound of it!! Pardi is doing God’s work over at mainstream country radio. Also, I’m guessing Ain’t Always the Cowboy will be his next single, which I think lyrically is stronger than Heartache Med!
January 26, 2020 @ 2:55 pm
”Pardi is doing God’s work over at mainstream country radio. ”
well put …..gotta give you that arnold……and i AM appreciative of anyone trying to do that .
January 26, 2020 @ 2:16 pm
UPDATE:
I apologize in advance, apparently I was misinformed. Pardi will be maxed spun all next week… I thought this past week was when Capitol was doing the final push….
Information provided by Chris Owen via Twitter (he works at radio)
January 26, 2020 @ 10:58 am
God’s Country is a great song & Blake Shelton did a terrific job with it!!! But I really hope he doesn’t win tonight because I’m sick of his crazy stan accounts all over social media praising everything he does.
January 26, 2020 @ 11:04 am
* but Mr Phillips never blew enough hot air to need a little gold plated paperweight… *
-Carl Perkins Cadillac / Drive by Truckers
January 26, 2020 @ 12:16 pm
just glanced at the nominations for the year .
except for reba , tanya and yola what a musical yawnfest .
what a total YAWNFEST !
good night to reorganize my cutlery drawer
January 26, 2020 @ 3:14 pm
The Grammys are not really a musically progressive organization at all, which is part of the reason you agree with them. Beck over Beyonce? Taylor over Kendrick? Regardless of what you think about those 4 performers, it was indisputable that those were conservative choices NOT based on critical acclaim, and the Grammys are rife with that kind of thinking.
You view the system as fair because you like the outcomes, not the process.
January 26, 2020 @ 3:57 pm
Beck and Taylor Swift are “conservative”? Ludicrous. And arguably, racist based on skin color. Maybe the Grammy Awards picked who they thought should have won.
January 26, 2020 @ 5:37 pm
Are you out of your mind? Beyonce and Kendrick Lamar released genre-bending albums seen as the pinnacle of their respective careers up to the point, we’re both critical and commercial succeses, and it’s racist to suggest they deserved a Grammy over a musically regressive 90’s act and a Taylor Swift album named for and based on 80’s music?
This is really where you show your ignorance, Trigger. You have no ability to judge music outside of country in any capacity – not quality, critical acclaim, impact, or even commercial success.
If the Grammys want to be the authority on all music then they need to get with times and understand every genre they give an award for, as well as the cultural landscape. I suggest you do the same, since you’re increasingly passing judgement on things I doubt you’ve even listened to, let alone understand.
January 26, 2020 @ 8:25 pm
Oh thank god you’re here, we were so lost.
January 26, 2020 @ 5:47 pm
I don’t know about the legitimacy thing. It’s show business. Nothing is real.