Song Review – Jason Isbell & The 400 Unit “Be Afraid”
Jason Isbell and the 400 Unit have announced their sixth studio album to be released on May 15th called Reunions. Once again produced by Dave Cobb at Nashville’s Studio ‘A’, it immediately becomes one of the most anticipated releases in country, roots, and Americana in 2020 due to the prestige and respect Jason Isbell has minted for himself over the last few years of stellar, critically-acclaimed, and award-winning releases.
Ahead of the new album, Jason Isbell has released the blistering and politically-charged anthem “Be Afraid.” Far from roots or even notions of Americana, it’s only fair to label the track as a rock song, with a highly-charged political message that not only finds Isbell refusing to “shut up and sing,” and not only compells other artists to rise and resist as well, but takes the message even further by calling out artists who refuse to use their platform to espouse political ideologies parallel with Isbell’s with lines like, “If your words add up to nothing then you’re making a choice, to sing a cover when we need a battle cry.”
But as vogue as it is at the moment in Americana music to wax political (including recent albums and songs from the Drive-By Truckers, Will Hoge, and many others), “Be Afraid” takes the same severely shortsighted notion of how to effect change in culture, while completely misunderstanding why some people and performers—including the politically active, and including the politically active with views aligned with Jason Isbell—turn to music to divest from the politically-charged moments we live among, and shouldn’t be judged for doing so.
There is a big difference between telling an artist to “shut up and sing,” and wishing they would not polarize their music or public persona with terse, political messages that cast wide aspersions on people, and in this case, simply for not wanting to get political in music. “Be Afraid” is latest example of letting anger and ideology cloud judgement, while passing severe judgement upon others for inaction, telling them their “words add up to nothing,” and from a powerful voice in American music, rendering this song not just misguided, but potentially dangerous in it’s terse, closed-minded, and severe ideology.
Furthermore, the notions that “Be Afraid” assert that if you speak out against the current administration or social repression, then you risk retribution is just incorrect. Isbell tells Rolling Stone Country, “I’d like to be able to say, ‘I did what I could, I did part of what I could,’ or you know, something that’s not just, ‘Well, I had records to sell, so I kept my mouth shut.’ I’ll never lose sleep over not selling more records, but I’ll definitely lose sleep over keeping my mouth shut and letting things happen to people who are minorities for whatever reason, be it gender or their race or their sexual preference or the fact that they ‘like science.’”
Editor’s Note: The comments of Jason Isbell in Rolling Stone Country were taken from a previous interview in 2018, and applied to his new song. They were not about “Be Afraid” specifically.
But this is not 2003 when the Dixie Chicks faced a backlash. In fact numerous mainstream country stars have spoken out politically recently on things such as gun control, immigration, or even just having the right to speak out, including Maren Morris, Dierks Bentley, Little Big Town, Tyler Hubbard of Florida Georgia Line, and Kacey Musgraves, and have weathered it just fine, if not profiteered in favorable press coverage and awards.
The fear of speaking out these days is not being shouldered by the left. It’s being sowed by them, branding anyone who dares to step out of a very narrow, black and white dogmatic ideology as racist, sexist, homophobic, or any number of other scarlet letters in the rise of cancel culture which is very directly stifling speech, and disrupting the free flow of ideas not seen since the repressive family values era of the Reagan Administration. This is the reason comedians and free speech advocates are finding more traction than ever, and left-leaving performers and ideologues such as Dave Chappelle and Bill Maher, and even Barack Obama are speaking out about the trappings and misguidedness of “woke” culture, and how it’s fueling a backlash that is counter-productive to the ideals being pushed.
Jason Isbell also approaches this song with the same tunnel vision that so many who speak out for everyone to rise up and engage in political action have. Many people may feel empowered or emboldened by “Be Afraid” to speak up. But just as many who believe counter to the ideologies of Jason Isbell might be compelled to take action, and speak out for their own ideologies as well. In fact if history teaches us anything, the likelihood is the boomerang effect of a message will be greater. It was the Million Mom March in Washington after the massacre at Columbine High School that was the biggest one-day recruitment and fundraising effort for the NRA in history, and codified the organization as America’s most powerful lobbyist. It’s been the impeachment of President Trump that has filled his campaign coffers with record donations, buffered his approval numbers, and emboldened his base. It was Taylor Swift’s endorsement of a Democrat Senatorial candidate in Tennessee that swayed the electorate towards the Republican. It is the kind of “all or nothing” ideology found in Jason Isbell’s “Be Afraid” that got Donald J. Trump elected President in the first place, and why he is very likely to be elected again.
There is nothing wrong with expressing political beliefs in music. And if people don’t like it, they can just not listen. But calling other artists to action like a Mullah in a Madrasa while characterizing that another artist’s “words add up to nothing” if they don’t speak up is a step too far. Right now the Americana music scene is running a severe risk of being overrun by political ideologues, which ironically, repels the very people who possibly could benefit from more reasonable, cool-minded messages about equality and acceptance served in more subtle, nuanced, objective and wise manners. In the world of Jason Isbell’s “Be Afraid” you are not acceptable if you choose to not speak out. And as the current King of Americana, those words have a great impact. There is a lot of peer pressure to get political in Americana at the moment, or risk being ostracized. “Be Afraid” puts words and actions behind that fear.
Also, “Be Afraid” is just another symptom of the way culture is being indoctrinated and polarized by the media into believing we’re living through the worst of times, when the work of Harvard’s Steven Pinker, to one statistic after another proving that crime is down, wealth is up, inequality is shrinking, and minorities and women are receiving more opportunities than ever are undeniable. That’s not to say there still isn’t incredible work to be done towards true equality, or that some people still live in communities that present severe challenges. But this idea that life in the United States is so severe, everyone must speak up and take action is simply a symptom of the proliferation of social media into our daily lives, and the polarization the electorate due to the political and media industrial complex gaming the American mind, and everyone wanting to blame everyone but themselves for the problems of the world. The notion Jason Isbell forwards in the song that the “facts” are always in favor of one side underscores this. People are pissed off at Trump. But polarizing every aspect of society until there is change is what is assuring there won’t be any, as everyone just retreats to their corners, holds firmer to their ideology, and nuance is bled from discussion.
These opinions about “Be Afraid” will be cast off as redneck sophistry by many. But the truth is that to preserve the power of music to truly enact change in culture as one of the few things that can bring people together, the notions found in “Be Afraid” must be challenged. But the song is not a total loss either. As always, Isbell’s turn of phrase is smart, even if the message isn’t. And in the second verse when Isbell talks about growling at the guy who just tuned his guitar, and not recognizing your own kid in the wings, he speaks to the dichotomy and loss of perspective that comes with stardom. By centering more on that, and how we’re all flawed—even those that have public forums to speak out—and rolling off the notion that if you don’t speak out you’re basically part of the problem could have rendered “Be Afraid” as productive. But instead, the militant political messages far outweigh the positives which will assuredly receive great praise by the press, but do nothing to tilt the scales of power in the United States, or if anything, will tip them away from the ideology of Jason Isbell espouses.
February 10, 2020 @ 12:25 pm
Well said. I don’t begrudge Isbell his opinions or his right to share them. Knock yourself out. But I hope he won’t begrudge me taking a pass on this album.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:50 pm
I’m gonna make this comment here so that more people will see it. The Rolling Stone article is using quotes from a 2018 interview to make it seem as if Isbell using this song to call out artists who won’t speak politically. The lyrics to this song are not inherently political – they are a simple call for people to do the right thing.
February 10, 2020 @ 6:39 pm
Interesting, and thanks for the clarification, Jared S. Though this doesn’t really change my opinion on this song, this is yet another glaring example of Rolling Stone Country hyper-politicizing a situation, and causing friction where it doesn’t need to be. They definitely took a political agenda to covering this song, adding a polarizing element that was unnecessary, unhelpful, and frankly, unethical by putting words into Jason Isbell’s mouth.
February 10, 2020 @ 7:35 pm
“They definitely took a political agenda to covering this song, adding a polarizing element that was unnecessary, unhelpful, and frankly, unethical by putting words into Jason Isbell’s mouth.“
I didn’t read the Rolling Stone article, but this is a pretty succinct take on the review here. You took a song that was only political in the most vague and impressionistic sense, and wrote a fully tilt political review, all while somehow unironically decrying Isbell inserting politics into his music.
February 11, 2020 @ 7:28 am
Them sweet, sweet clicks, though.
I agree this really looks like a bad faith take, or at least an overly emotional response to an idea I don’t think Isbell was really pushing, and I’d guess it’s to some extent purposeful in order to be controversial and drive traffic. But at the same time, the song isn’t strong enough to warrant any kind of passionate defense out of me.
It’s fine. It’s hard to hear what he’s singing half the time. I’m about over Dave Cobb. Whether he means to or not, Isbell seems to come off as preachy to a lot of folks when he starts taking sides.
I wish we’d get more stuff in the vein of Razor Town, Live Oak, Speed Trap Town, etc. Or at least get some edge to the rock songs. But he’s making the music he wants to make and he’s put out enough top-shelf stuff already that I’m grateful for, so a few misses won’t really change that for me.
And the same way, Trig promotes so much good music and hits the right notes in enough of his articles that I can forgive the occasional miss without being too uptight about it. Appreciate all the time put in to this site, guy.
February 11, 2020 @ 8:20 am
This article did not receive a lot of traffic. It has received a lot of comments, but not a lot of traffic. Articles that are titled “Song Review” do not get traffic. Every word I said in this review is my honest opinion. You may disagree with it and I respect that, but I’m not sure how this article would receive large amounts of traffic for the supposed controversial content it contains unless they read it. Clickbait starts and ends with the title. There is absolutely nothing clickbait about this article.
February 11, 2020 @ 7:37 am
I feel the same way about the song, although I think I had the same response to songs released ahead of the last two albums and came around to love them, so I give it time and the benefit of the doubt for how it will fit I into the album.
That said, I was excited to actually read a review of the song, given my own ambivalence, and instead got this. I guess it is all about the clicks, and we should stop reinforcing it by commenting on posts like this, but it’s hard not to.
February 11, 2020 @ 8:16 am
Titling an article with “Song Review” or “Album Review” is about the the least clickbait thing I can absolutely possibly do. In fact it’s so anti-clickbait, when I title articles with those words, Facebook buries them in the algorithm. I titled this as a song review purposely to keep people from criticizing it as clickbait, as opposed to “Jason Isbell Gets Political” or “Jason Isbell Crosses Red Line” or something to that effect. Saying this article is “clickbait” is just one of the many, many excuses I have seen to circumvent actually addressing the assertions of the article itself.
February 11, 2020 @ 9:24 am
What assertions to address? The article was just a rant about how you don’t like Isbell’s politics, projected onto a song that didn’t reference any specific politics. It read like you’d had it saved on your hard drive since White Man’s World and just quickly plugged in the name of the song. I’ve heard you bemoan that every disagreement these days becomes a proxy about Trump – but you’re the person who inserted that in here. I felt better when I thought you were doing it for clicks…
February 11, 2020 @ 10:19 am
Isbell stories get lots of traction here no matter what. I disagree to some extent with the interpretation of the song, but I also don’t mind contributing to the traffic/discussion because the positives of this site far outweigh any negatives, and you gotta pay the bills somehow.
February 11, 2020 @ 10:27 am
Honest question here, Trig:
If this article has 200+ comments when most others get a handful, doesn’t it also follow that more people are reading it? Or is it truly about the same amount of people landing here but so many more are compelled to comment than usual? It could be, I guess. Seems like a lot of people have strong opinions one way or another on Isbell.
And I’m not calling this article clickbait, per se, but you had to know that the way you wrote it was going to drive a ton of discussion/attention and I would assume the clicks follow. I’m not even upset about that side of it. You gotta draw people in somehow, just like the rants on the mainstream guys.
It’s just hard for me to see how you got such a reaction to this particular song, but if that’s your honest takeaway then so be it.
February 11, 2020 @ 12:28 pm
The insinuation that this article is “clickbait” implies that I just made up a bunch of incendiary opinions just to stir the pot. That is 100% inaccurate. Conversely, I posted this article knowing it would be controversial, and may result in me losing some readers. Nonetheless, I decided that this idea that musicians music speak up politically in song or have their work rendered useless, or be labeled as part of the problem was so important to challenge, I posted the article anyway. I’d have to be pretty daft to post an article that might get me an elevated amout of clicks in the short term, only to burn bridges with readers in the long-term. The only thing that keep people coming back to this site is credibility.
As for comments vs. traffic, I understand that this is an easy way for readers to denote interest in a topic, but I see the actual numbers. I’m not going to act like this article didn’t receive some traffic, but my article on Sam Hunt’s new song, or the Albums of the Decade post received 3 to 4 times the traffic this one did. Also, the way websites are judged as far as traffic is not on “clicks,” but on “unique viewers,” or the amount of unique individuals who come to a given website in a 24 hour period. Robust comment sections can draw an elevated amount of clicks, but since it’s a lot of the same people coming back and forth, it doesn’t really affect the unique view numbers, which is what advertising rates and revenue is pegged to.
I did not post this article to create interest in this site. In fact I knew it would probably sour my name with some. I posted this article because it’s what I believe, and it what I felt needed to be said.
February 11, 2020 @ 1:37 pm
So you’re saying you knew to be afraid, very afraid, but you did it anyway?
February 11, 2020 @ 9:02 am
Sure would be nice if you’d amend the article to clarify that Isbell’s comments were taken out of context by RS. At least RS had the integrity to specify that the quotes were from a 2018 interview.
February 11, 2020 @ 12:44 pm
Oh trust me, this will be addressed at some point, along with the other political malfeasance being perpetrated by Rolling Stone Country, as I have done before. I did update the article with a note.
Also, when it comes this this, “but the lyrics aren’t really political,” everything must be considered in context. We’re living in a very politically polarized time, and Jason Isbell knew exactly how this song would be interpreted. Every major media outlet interpreted as a politically-oriented song. We’re splitting hairs here.
February 11, 2020 @ 8:01 am
“The fear of speaking out these days is not being shouldered by the left. It’s being sowed by them.”
This is still the truth.
And Isbell should shut up and sing.
How many people of differing opinions will change their minds because they hear a song?
February 11, 2020 @ 9:46 am
If this is what you think, wouldn’t this song offer encouragement to speak up, regardless of one’s place on the political spectrum?
February 11, 2020 @ 11:05 am
“Shut up and sing”
I’m glad you’re listening & hopefully it will help pull your head out of the dark place it’s currently residing.
February 11, 2020 @ 11:25 am
Ah. My head is in a “dark place” because I don’t agree with bed wetting, Leftist woke hipsters.
I’m a conservative Never-Trumper. But “tolerant” Leftists like you make me want to vote for him in 2020.
February 14, 2020 @ 10:24 am
You realize your asking Isbell to censor himself so that you could enjoy his music without having your beliefs challenged. Do you need a safe space from Jason’s words? Are they triggering? Fuckin snowflake
February 14, 2020 @ 12:33 pm
1. “You’re.”
2. Name-calling really bolsters your position, Mr. semi-literate Leftist pussy.
February 11, 2020 @ 6:29 am
I don’t really understand how anyone became a fan of Isbell if they passed on any albums that contained a political song as that includes all of them all the way back to his drive by truckers albums.
February 11, 2020 @ 1:08 pm
???.
February 11, 2020 @ 1:32 pm
Whats the confusion here?
February 10, 2020 @ 12:26 pm
Politics aside, would love to hear your thoughts on it as a piece of music. Thought the vocals were pretty muted. It actually sounds like a poor man’s version of hope the high road.
February 10, 2020 @ 12:47 pm
I would say it’s a much better version of Hope the High Road, which I also loved. The depth of lyrics is much stronger
February 10, 2020 @ 1:21 pm
“Cumberland Gap” is what came to mind for me.
Generally as music, I would say it’s par. It fits the Isbell formula for his rock songs, “Hope The High Road” included, and like most all indie Nashville projects these days, the audio quality leaves much to be desired. It’s not bad, but not good either.
February 11, 2020 @ 1:19 am
Why are you calling it indie music. I never understood that name. Its either Americana, outlaw country,or mainstream country
February 11, 2020 @ 11:42 am
Its none of those, this albums not on the country spectrum. Its literally marketed as a rock album
February 10, 2020 @ 12:31 pm
Needed to be said.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:03 pm
Needs to be said that “wrong again” is an incredible album. Thank you for it!
February 10, 2020 @ 12:32 pm
“These opinions about “Be Afraid” will be cast off as redneck sophistry by many.”
I would be one of the many.
February 11, 2020 @ 1:14 pm
I thought the same, except I considered it hipster/woke sophistry. Because I have loved isbell for almost 20 years and this song is by far the worst.
February 10, 2020 @ 12:35 pm
While I more or less agree with Isbell’s politics, and I try not to be too critical in comments, but I can’t argue with this review. First off, I think the song sounds a little disjointed and messy, although I enjoy the chorus, and many of Isbell’s more rocking songs. There just seems to be a little too much virtue signaling and finger pointing going on in this one. I’m happy he’s comfortable sharing his beliefs, but there’s still a place for “secular” music in any political climate. Even in the 60s, when some of the best protest and politically charged music was written, there were still plenty of great music that didn’t have a larger message.
Looking at the tracklist, it looks like there will be plenty of political songs on the album, but also some that aren’t. I’m still very much looking forward to the album and the tour, and will hopefully get a chance to see the band in Atlanta this summer.
February 10, 2020 @ 12:37 pm
From The Boot:
Jason Isbell and the 400 Unit, Reunions Track List:
1. “What’ve I Done to Help”
2. “Dreamsicle”
3. “Only Children”
4. “Overseas”
5. “Running With Our Eyes Closed”
6. “River”
7. “Be Afraid”
8. “St. Peter’s Autograph”
9. “It Gets Easier”
10. “Letting You Go”
February 10, 2020 @ 1:24 pm
“Be Afraid” is just one song, and we should all reserve judgement on the record until we hear it in its entirety.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:34 pm
Totally agree. Isbell always deserves the benefit of the doubt in my book. Personally, I’m intrigued by “Dreamsicle”!
February 10, 2020 @ 1:51 pm
Dreamsickle is Isbell’s go to drink.
February 10, 2020 @ 3:02 pm
I think I mostly agree with Crum (and like Crum I also more or less agree with his politics). In my first listen to the song, I also perceive some messiness & some disjointedness. However, I don’t perceive the virtue signaling… maybe the instrumentals are a bit too messy for me to make out enough of/overwhelm the lyrics?
I want to listen to the whole album though as I’m wondering how this song fits within the whole.
I’ve love Jason Isbell’s music and have long considered him to be a folk singer who plays rock and roll so I’m not surprised at all whenever there’s anything vaguely political.
February 10, 2020 @ 12:37 pm
I get more than enough politics on a daily basis. The last thing I want is to listen to more…
February 10, 2020 @ 12:40 pm
Ha Ha, I’ve been told by Isbell’s fans that If I don’t like his political songs to go listen to Ted Nugent, Kid Rock so I did. Charlie Daniels too. I love me some country music.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:07 pm
Bold of you to just come out and admit to listening to Kid Rock, like it’s some sort of normal thing to do.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:40 pm
Not to mention calling that trash “Country Music.”
February 10, 2020 @ 1:55 pm
How would that be bold? Have you seen the craft beer/ bearded hipsters that listen to Isbell? There’s nothing to fear. And Charlie Daniels is way more country than Isbell any day
February 10, 2020 @ 7:18 pm
The people who listen to Isbell may drink good beer and have beards…but anyone listening to Kid Rock mixes Peach Schnapps with 7Up and has a neckbeard.
Or they’re 13.
February 10, 2020 @ 2:17 pm
What would be bold about liking Kid Rock? I’ve seen the Isbell fans….lotta craft beer, lotta beards, lotta hipster…very little to fear. Charlie Daniels is way more country than Isbell btw
February 10, 2020 @ 12:41 pm
This is a good song to go to the bathroom/bar at the concert
February 10, 2020 @ 1:39 pm
I always hit the restroom during “white mans world”
February 10, 2020 @ 6:18 pm
You’re actually THAT fragile? Wow that’s somethin…
February 10, 2020 @ 6:29 pm
I also hit the restroom during White Man’s World, and I’m very far left on this site (aka, Centre-Right in the Northeast and Europe).
He’s written much better songs about similar themes.
February 11, 2020 @ 7:16 pm
LOL. You being Centre-Right.
Goes to show how subservient the Northeast and Europe have become to the forces of tyranny and big government. Human rights are almost extinct there. Sacrificed to the state.
February 12, 2020 @ 5:41 pm
Son…I voted Romney in 2012, and I voted Republican for both Governor and Senate in 2018 (a couple of acquaintances are related to my House Rep, so I voted for him that year, and will probably vote for him in the Senate race this fall).
My favorite president of the last 45 years is HW, my favorite politician of the 20th century is David Lloyd George, and, if I‘d had a vote in Sunday’s elections, I’d have gone for either Fine Gael or Fianna Fáil, based on who had a better shot in my district.
Thinking that we should do unto others as we would have them do unto us and that much shall be required of those to whom much has been given, didn’t start being called “Left Wing” until very, very, very recently.
February 12, 2020 @ 6:07 pm
“Read my Lips” HW being your favorite president says it all. He was a fake conservative.
February 12, 2020 @ 6:50 pm
So…your argument for HW being a “Bad Conservative” is that he prioritized the interests of the American people over his own re-election, resulting in the massive late-90s economic bump that Bill Clinton received undue credit for.
I get the feeling that you don’t actually know enough about American history to have intelligent conversations about these subjects.
I assume you also think Nixon was a “Fake Conservative” for creating the EPA, and proposing UBI and UHC schemes?
After all, I’m a pretty big Nixon fan.
February 13, 2020 @ 4:21 pm
You really know SFA about British politics – Lloyd George’s reputation in UK is justifiably tarnished / blackened by two irrefutable facts:
1. His proven corruption as the outgoing PM in the early 1920s in accepting bribes from the rich to ennoble them i.e. making them hereditary peers in the (still) unelected House of Lords
2 His initial appeasement in the 1930s towards Germany and actually praising Hitler and the Nazis during this time and ultimately his willingness to surrender to Germany before the US entered WW2 in the early 1940s.
Why do you think he is the rightly forgotten man in British political history despite his earlier progressive work in Liberal governments preceding WW1?
Clement Attlee is by far the superior politician – a true patriot (Churchill’s words) and a fantastic reformer with the establishment of the NHS for starters – free health care for all, something a lot of US citizens have a problem with for some unfathomable reason.
February 13, 2020 @ 4:49 pm
I actually took a course in Oxford on UK Prime Ministers, haha. Lloyd George was definitely a nightmare personally, but the work he and Churchill did under Asquith played a far greater role in the creation of the Welfare than Atlee did, by shifting the Overton Window in terms of British entitlements.
Anyway, I’m pro-UHC…but the NHS’s greatest legacy is offering an object lesson for the rest of Europe in how not to construct a Universal Healthcare System, haha. The French, Dutch, Australians, and Germans all offer better patient outcomes at a significantly lower cost by using a hybrid approach, allowing them to spend that money on other social programs.
February 10, 2020 @ 2:04 pm
Or just skip his shows altogether. I like a song here and there but just don’t get the draw of this guy at all. This song is just plain weak. The message is dumb(and I lean left but so what), the music and singing are nothing special at all and the overall production/sound is lame. It just sounds like more of the same from this way over-hyped artist.
February 10, 2020 @ 12:41 pm
I don’t mind his politics but I mind his snark. And I don’t like the sound of this album. That doesn’t mean it stinks, it just means I won’t buy it.
February 10, 2020 @ 12:42 pm
Saw him at Mile Zero. The thrill is most assuredly gone. Like Sturgill, follow your muse wherever you want, but if you’re going to preach, hector and insult, I won’t.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:26 pm
That’s the thing. I don’t begrudge Jason Isbell getting political. I judge Isbell for saying that if you DON’T get political, “your words add up to nothing.” What an insult to music as an artform.
February 10, 2020 @ 3:36 pm
Eh. I see what you mean but I also slightly disagree, Trigger. I think he’s saying that people who stay completely away from politics or who say that they’re apolitical are worse than people who are political– no matter the point of view.
TL; DR. I think it’s just a simple “Be Involved.”
February 10, 2020 @ 6:42 pm
I don’t think we disagree here. Perhaps as an apolitical guy who thinks most everyone’s opinion should be respected regardless of where they stand, I found this song so insulting, and the crossing of a red line.
February 11, 2020 @ 12:23 pm
This is just such a weird way to take the song. I don’t think the line has to mean anything beyond make your words/art/whatever meaningful. It’s strange to me that you interpret it in such a personally insulting way.
February 11, 2020 @ 12:36 pm
…except Rolling Stone, NPR, other media outlets, and commenters in this very comments section interpreted the line the same way I did. It seems like everyone wants to dance around the elephant in the room here, which is what Jason Isbell said was irresponsible. Make it all about me all you want. You can’t refute how people are taking this line, not just myself.
February 11, 2020 @ 1:06 pm
I didn’t make it all about you. You made it all about you. Think about how stupid what you’re saying is. He didn’t write any “irresponsible” lyrics. That’s the most over censorious, cancel culture, snowflakey bullshit I’ve ever read.
From the NPR review:
“Later, Isbell pointedly criticizes artists for not speaking their minds more forcefully”
To begin, it’s just their interpretation, but there’s nothing controversial or irresponsible about that. He’s not telling them what to speak their minds about. I thought criticizing vapid country by the numbers was what this site was all about. Words that “add up” to something can be about anything: depression, oppression, heartbreak, etc…
February 11, 2020 @ 1:20 pm
didn’t make it all about you. You made it all about you. Think about how stupid what you’re saying is. He didn’t write any “irresponsible” lyrics. That’s the most over censorious, cancel culture, snowflakey bullshit I’ve ever read.
From the NPR review:
“Later, Isbell pointedly criticizes artists for not speaking their minds more forcefully”
To begin, it’s just their interpretation, but there’s nothing controversial or irresponsible about that. He’s not telling them what to speak their minds about. I thought criticizing vapid country by the numbers was what this site was all about. Words that “add up” to something can be about anything: depression, oppression
Bullshit, anyone who had followed isbell s Twitter you know exactly what he is saying. Isbell is scared his older material will bring that cancel culture on him so he is overcompensating.
February 11, 2020 @ 3:17 pm
I’m not on Twitter. Isbell specifically castigates other artists for their political stances? Or he just shares his own?
February 11, 2020 @ 3:50 pm
Generally speaking, I think that Jason Isbell’s Twitter presence is fine compared to some other artists such as Margo Price and a few others who spend most of their time attacking something. Isbell is mostly dad jokes, with an occasional political comment. However, on multiple occasions, he’s gone after his own fans. There was a big deal last summer involving feral hogs that went viral.
https://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/rock/8526434/jason-isbell-started-feral-hogs-twitter-meme
February 11, 2020 @ 4:05 pm
So then he isn’t going after other artists for their political views, as suggested by Jacob?
February 11, 2020 @ 4:54 pm
He’s going after them in “Be Afraid.” He also has gone after other artists on Twitter, specifically John Rich and Travis Tritt. But of course, those are two guys that also attack people due to politics. And by the way, I have called out John Rich about his hypocrisy before as well, just in case anyone thinks I only hold my ire for the left. Here’s yet another example of how I’ve remained extremely consistent on this topic:
https://www.savingcountrymusic.com/john-rich-heed-your-own-advice-in-shut-up-about-politics/
February 11, 2020 @ 4:59 pm
Also, here’s the Twitter exhange between Jason Isbell and John Rich. Rich was the one to actually take the high road first.
https://www.soundslikenashville.com/news/john-rich-jason-isbell-politics/
February 11, 2020 @ 5:03 pm
You’re reading him “going after them” into a very subtle lyric, which is fine you can hear what you want, but obviously that speaks more to the listener than the artist. Are you really drawing an equivalence between Be Afraid and Shut Up About Politics? This whole thing is so tiresome, there is zero reason for anyone to be offended by this song.
February 11, 2020 @ 8:43 pm
It’s amazing how much your tone has changed from your review of The Nashville Sound. You’ve gone from “music not meant as political insult shouldn’t be taken as such, or characterized so” and “I’m tired of seeing people get ticked off at folks they label “snowflakes” when they’re the ones freaking out over one or two stupid little things in someone’s music” to writing an entire article about a single line in a song. Also, deriding the left as intolerant oppressors of free speech isn’t apolitical in the slightest.
February 11, 2020 @ 8:57 pm
Saying artists words “add up to nothing” if they don’t speak out politically is an insult by definition. A single line in a song, but a very huge impact coming from the King of Americana. And once again, this isn’t just my assessment, but the consensus of the media.
“deriding the left as intolerant oppressors of free speech isn’t apolitical in the slightest.”
I didn’t paint with such a broad brush. What I said was, that is where the cancel culture ideology is emanating from these days, which is true. That doesn’t mean that’s everyone. It doesn’t even mean it’s a majority. And saying it’s to a degree that has “not seen since the repressive family values era of the Reagan Administration,” I think would prove this isn’t a slanted political statement, but an attempt to take a wider view of how political anger at the moment has wrought the same missteps by the right in the past.
February 12, 2020 @ 7:04 am
The line isn’t “If you don’t speak politically, then your words add up to nothing,” it’s “if your words add up to nothing, then you’re making a choice to sing a cover when you need a battle cry.”
You’ve invented a premise that isn’t actually expressed in the song, and then written a thesis attacking the conclusion. But you’re attacking a premise you invented, not one that Isbell actually expressed. He wrote the song. He could have written anything he wanted. He could have referenced the Green New Deal.
There is absolutely nothing irresponsible or controversial about “if you’re words add up to nothing.” If it wasn’t for your choice to interject politics here, you’d actually see it as a line that’s completely consistent with the mission of this site, and on the same wavelength of Childer’s saying “let’s not solo cup and pickup truck it to death.” The fact that you’re going on about unemployment figures, etc… should show you how far you’ve strayed from actually substantially engaging with the music, and not just using it as a springboard for another tired rehashing of our political faultlines. I wish you’d be big enough to admit you blew this one.
February 10, 2020 @ 12:45 pm
Looks like I bought my last record from him. It’s one thing for your political leanings to shine through on your song. But to be preached at this much by a singer when all I want is to be entertained by his music crosses the line for me.
February 10, 2020 @ 2:01 pm
K. Bye.
February 10, 2020 @ 4:24 pm
No…stop…don’t go…
February 11, 2020 @ 6:31 am
I don’t understand how you ever were an Isbell fan then? This stuff has always been there.
February 14, 2020 @ 11:08 am
Seriously.
The first time I saw him was his 3rd show as a member of DBT, in 2001. Have always been a huge fan.
But now, he’s just another preachy, sanctimonious, Leftist, elitist f*ck who thinks the only valid opinions are his and those of his fellow travelers .
Didn’t realize till reading all these comments that he’s from the Beto O’Rourke school of 2nd Amendment interpretation, too. Eff that guy.
I liked him better when he was a drunk/junkie. Maybe he’ll start using again. Till then, I’m done.
February 14, 2020 @ 12:08 pm
I liked him better when he was a drunk/junkie. Maybe he’ll start using again. Till then, I’m done.
You seem nice. And hey, if you do decide to cast your lot with Trump, don’t sweat it. Just remember, the libs made you do it.
February 14, 2020 @ 12:27 pm
Yeah, wishing for the failed sobriety of an artist for the sake of their art is the wrong way to be a music fan. Jason Isbell is pretty universally recognized example of why the “they were better before they got clean” theory doesn’t hold water.
February 14, 2020 @ 12:54 pm
“I liked him better when he was a drunk/junkie. Maybe he’ll start using again. Till then, I’m done.”
Spoken like a true Trumpster. Sorry Isbell hurt your little feelers, snowflake.
February 19, 2020 @ 8:35 am
I’ve enjoyed the positions expressed by many, but your request for him to go back to being an addict is an indication not only of your deference to incivility but even worse a gross lack of humanity. To hate the other to such a degree must be exhausting.
February 10, 2020 @ 12:46 pm
I used to enjoy him. It’s just the last few years he just comes off like broken record…America sucks & Southern people are dumb, blah, blah, blah.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:19 pm
He can be forgiven for thinking that, with the president America has. History books will not be kind to 2017-2021 America.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:28 pm
History books will reflect that the last four years were a time of relative peace and economic prosperity, just like during the Clinton Administration, despite sharp political rancor from the opposition based on seething hatred.
February 10, 2020 @ 2:21 pm
The only people who define this as a time of economic prosperity are ones whi don’t understand how economics work— Or they are so wealthy that it is working well for them. I don’t know how we’re ever going to fix it but it is not in a good place and we’re not looking at the right metrics to understand that.
February 10, 2020 @ 3:41 pm
I don’t know, man. I’m a trim carpenter who works out of a $500 minivan. I never advertise and I’m booked out several months in advance. I’m not wealthy but I’m not in debt, and I don’t have to work a 50 hour week to make ends meet. Making money is really easy right now. Maybe that’s not a good definition for economic prosperity?
February 10, 2020 @ 5:05 pm
My 401K says otherwise.
February 10, 2020 @ 5:18 pm
Wow. You dumb
February 10, 2020 @ 6:46 pm
The economy is better than it’s been in recent memory. For African Americans, it’s been better than at any other time in history. These are statistical facts. That doesn’t mean that there aren’t many who are being left behind in this economy, which always is going to happen in a Capitalist society. But this ridiculous, continued notion that life is worse in America than it’s ever been is conceited, self-centered, and flat out verifiably false.
The power out of party always downplays the economy, similar to how the power in party always plays it up.
February 10, 2020 @ 7:00 pm
All the increases in the economy are going to those at the top. Corporations get a big tax cut, they do stock buybacks. They pay the lowest possible wages they can, fight raising the minimum wage tooth and nail, and continue to give millions in comp and stock to the executive level. Hell, my wife is a teacher and she’d need an instant raise of over $10K just for her paycheck to be worth what it was 15 years ago. Inflation continues to rise and the people who do the work don’t see the benefits from a booming stock market. We’re destroying the middle class and nothing Trump has done has made that better. He’s made it worse. Well, not him. He’s a tool. The GOP has made it worse because at the end of the day their only concern are the people who write big checks to campaigns — SO THEY’LL MAINTAIN THE STATUS QUO. More people are being left behind than ever. More people are working multiple jobs to make ends meet and are one medical emergency away from bankruptcy. So sorry, Trigger, shit ain’t all roses and lollipops. Conrad, I’m glad you’re bucking the odds and I hope it continues for you. And Howard, bite me.
February 11, 2020 @ 4:38 am
It’s the best economy we’ve had since at least the 90s if not longer. The amount of companies that are trying to find help for $25-$30 /hour jobs is unbelievable. To the point where some are offering $15000-$25000 sign on bonuses
February 10, 2020 @ 2:33 pm
Exactly, I’ve been a huge Fan, but I agree 100% with your review. I’ve stayed on board although I’m a Conservative but it’s getting more difficult.
February 10, 2020 @ 2:57 pm
I hope that’s a joke. “Economic prosperity”?
Maybe for those who can afford to invest, but the wealth disparity has never been greater.
February 10, 2020 @ 10:33 pm
You probably like Bernie Sanders too, LOL.
February 11, 2020 @ 9:49 am
You probably think Donald Trump “did nothing wrong” and thing that “acquitted” means innocent.
February 10, 2020 @ 12:47 pm
This song sounds like a woke version of the Gin Blossoms that features an extra effeminate Paul Simon on lead vocals.
February 10, 2020 @ 12:49 pm
Americana has became a seeping cesspool for liberal agendas….plain and simple. Isbell, the Truckers, Margo, Sturgill, etc. Love their artistry and musicianship but dang! We get it, you hate Trump, move on! His term is until November and after that, guess what? You still dont have a say in anything, but the American people do. People should never get blasted for not having much a say politically in their music, thank God for them i say.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:42 pm
This isn’t a groundbreaking song from Isbell. He’s welcome to his own opinions in his songs, but I’ll just be sure to skip over these ones when the album comes out.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:57 pm
Do you really expect artists to just keep their mouths shut with this obnoxious, rude, racist, misogynistic, corrupt clown in office? Seriously?
February 10, 2020 @ 2:08 pm
Absolutely not, but those who choose to be silent shouldnt be ridiculed for it.
February 10, 2020 @ 2:16 pm
Exactly.
February 11, 2020 @ 6:47 am
I’m very proud of Jason and how he has used his incredible talent to address the horrible mess that faces us as a nation. Those here that fail to appreciate his efforts choose to ignor the damage being done to America by the far right wing ego maniacal swine currently heading the government. His music is a wake up call to all and has obviously struck a nerve. Hopefully it will
February 11, 2020 @ 10:00 am
“The hottest place in Hell is reserved for those who remain neutral in times of great moral conflict.”
-MLK
February 11, 2020 @ 10:20 am
My Bible tells me otherwise and im pretty sure we all use the same water fountains now chief.
February 11, 2020 @ 3:42 pm
SwinginDoorsLetMeDown, Yes I suppose it’s possible Dr. King (and John Kennedy and Dante) were all incorrect about this particular concept and instead you are correct. However, I think that’s unlikely. Since you choose to denigrate King, here’s Jefferson: “All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent”. Maybe you don’t like Jefferson’s water fountain of wisdom either. How about the Bible? “Do not participate in the unfruitful deeds of darkness, but instead expose them” Is that well too deep? There’s the band Rush: “If you choose not to decide / You still have made a choice”
February 11, 2020 @ 1:28 pm
Does this really qualify as ridicule? I’d think most artists think their “words add up to” something, and those that don’t, don’t care.
February 10, 2020 @ 10:36 pm
You are dumb. Tell me who the better alternative would be? Hillary Clinton? Pocahontas? Creepy Biden? Socialist Sanders? Good luck with that.
February 11, 2020 @ 8:52 am
John McAfee
February 11, 2020 @ 11:09 am
“You still dont have a say in anything, but the American people do.”
umm. lol. jason isbell is an american citizen and i am willing to bet he votes.
February 11, 2020 @ 12:15 pm
Wow, Isbell stans are relentless! The only good thing that may happen if we get a democratic led government again, is that Isbell and others may start making decent music again instead of bellyaching….goodnight everyone.
February 12, 2020 @ 2:00 pm
We also might stop seeing children put in cages and stop having a sexual predator for a President.
.
In the words of Patterson Hood: “the powers that be are in for a comeuppance when generation lockdown has their day.”
.
Oops, better not say that…Trigger might get mad at me for making a political statement….
February 10, 2020 @ 12:52 pm
Would have liked reading a review of the song rather than a rambling statement about the lyrics.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:30 pm
The style of music was broached in the review, but in this case, the message was the elephant in the room that needed to be addressed.
February 10, 2020 @ 4:39 pm
This.
Sorry to see Trigger get triggered and completely forget to review the damn song.
February 10, 2020 @ 12:57 pm
It strikes me that you read in a whole lot of stuff that’s not actually said there based on your own stereotypes. This to me exemplifies the biggest problem. People can’t handle others having nuanced thoughts and speaking their own truth anymore. Once you open your mouth everyone is all over you with their assumptions and polarized views about what they think you mean. That is an across the spectrum problem. You make this point yourself for blaming lefties who have opinions about politics for getting right wingers elected. That’s not really the way elections work but it is the political agitprop works.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:32 pm
I listened to this song, formed my opinions, then read what Jason Isbell said about it himself to Rolling Stone Country, and had those opinions verified. There’s nothing based on “stereotypes” here. It’s based on what Jason Isbell says in the song, and what he reinforced in a subsequent interview.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:40 pm
The Rolling Stone article is referencing an interview from 2018. That interview was not about this song.
February 10, 2020 @ 12:58 pm
A lot of butthurt in here. If you skipped the last album because you didn’t like “Hope the High Road” and the video with Amanda in a political t-shirt…well you would have skipped Tupelo, Cumberland Gap, Vampires, Last of My Kind…
Don’t get triggered because he got chocolate in your peanut butter. Wait and see if our premier lyricist cranks out a winner
February 10, 2020 @ 1:12 pm
He hasn’t cranked out a lyrical winner since he got clean.
Fact.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:32 pm
Well, no, that’s an opinion. And since getting sober he’s authored Elephant, Cover Me Up, If We Were Vampires, 24 Frames, Speed Trap Town, Traveling Alone, etc.
So, not only is it an opinion and not a fact, but it’s a shitty opinion at that.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:36 pm
Fiction.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:46 pm
Yeah, Southeastern and Something More than Free were real duds.
“Fact.”
February 10, 2020 @ 5:13 pm
Ok let me rephrase: after Southeastern and Something More Than Free (which were just songs written within the Southeastern timeframe), his lyrics went to shit.
I blame getting clean and getting married.
February 10, 2020 @ 6:31 pm
…those albums were both written AFTER he got clean and married.
Hell…Cover Me Up is EXPLICITLY about getting clean and married.
Also…Tupelo and If We Were Vampires both exist, and are better than anything on SMTF.
February 10, 2020 @ 2:58 pm
LOL what lololol
February 10, 2020 @ 10:38 pm
Out of all the hot take comments here this is BY FAR the dumbest.
Congrats!
February 10, 2020 @ 1:36 pm
I agree. We should wait to hear the entire record before deciding how we feel about it. I just named Isbell’s “Southeastern” the 2nd best record of the last decade for a reason. They released this song first because they knew it would get a stir and positive press, and it did so.
February 10, 2020 @ 2:21 pm
‘Tupelo’ is one of his best. More Tupelo, less woke Springsteen.
February 10, 2020 @ 12:58 pm
Huh. I think you’re reading more politics into the lyrics than are actually there. He’s encouraging people (and himself) to do the right thing in a variety of situations, and to speak up for what’s right. Is that really a divisive message?
I’d say this one is way more tactful than White Man’s World, and probably less political than Hope the High Road.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:31 pm
I’ll go ahead an elaborate on my comment above. This morning, I made the choice to confront someone that I love and respect about something going on that I don’t think is right. This has nothing to do with politics whatsoever. I was terrified to make that phone call. I hate to tell people what they should do with their lives.
Hearing this song today has actually been a big encouragement that it was the right thing for me to speak up. My words need to add up to something.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:38 pm
I agree that’s the message that could have been taken away from the song. It got overshadowed when Jason Isbell decided to call out artists that don’t get political.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:42 pm
Rolling Stone put political meaning into the song by using an interview from 2018 to draw quotes. The quotes aren’t about this song.
February 10, 2020 @ 6:52 pm
Jared,
I appreciate you point this out, again. However, let’s still look at the content of the song. “If your words add up to nothing then you’re making a choice, to sing a cover when we need a battle cry,” is the lyric in question. I immediately took this as a terse political statement decrying artists that don’t use their music to speak up politically, and so did Rolling Stone Country. So even though the quotes supplied were out-of-context and this is an important point, I don’t think it significantly changes the assertion of the song. It does potentially add some more nuance to it.
February 10, 2020 @ 7:38 pm
” I immediately took this as a terse political statement decrying artists that don’t use their music to speak up politically”
That’s exactly the point, you took it that way.Others might take that same lyric and think that it refers to people that don’t speak out about bullying, sexual assault, hate crimes, etc.
February 10, 2020 @ 7:59 pm
…the lyrics you quoted say that songs should have meaning, and that anyone who writes songs with no real meaning is part of the problem.
Ignoring your personal perception of Isbell’s politics…what part of those lines do you disagree with?
February 11, 2020 @ 12:12 pm
Cool L Smooth:
“…the lyrics you quoted say that songs should have meaning, and that anyone who writes songs with no real meaning is part of the problem.
Ignoring your personal perception of Isbell’s politics…what part of those lines do you disagree with?”
Personally, all of that I disagree with. Should every artist HAVE to write songs that have deeper meanings for them to be good songs? Most of the great country artists we all purportedly love have a lot of songs that are fun, or breezy, or simple, or even inane but still great. It’s ok to not write about heavy things, and artists who don’t shouldn’t be “a part of the problem” simply because they like prefer to write non-pointed songs. JMO.
February 11, 2020 @ 5:13 pm
Hey Kris – I think this largely comes down to the divide between art and kitsch.
Isbell is a songwriter’s songwriter, and views what he does as poetry set to music…and even his “fun” songs (Outfit, Codeine, Super 8, Palmetto Rose, Chaos and Clothes) live up to that ideal.
It’s definitely fair to accuse him of being a snob, based on this song, but it’s really not about politics.
February 10, 2020 @ 6:20 pm
The lyrics are about artists who are afraid to write lyrics filled with truth – not political statements
February 10, 2020 @ 1:00 pm
I’m not surprised that Isbell is a hard left kind of guy. As a matter I’d be disappointed if he wasn’t. He’s got a right to his opinion, and I’m certainly not the guy to tell him what to write about. With that being said, I think he’s wrong. I’ll be passing on this album. I’m sure he won’t notice or even care about one less fan, but I’ve got better things to spend my money on than a lecture from a egotistical rockstar that I never asked to hear.
February 10, 2020 @ 3:03 pm
I assume you skipped Nashville Sound, then?
Damn shame you’ve decided to deprive yourself of great music, because the artist’s politics hurt your feelings.
February 10, 2020 @ 4:20 pm
where in my statement did I give the impression that my feelings were hurt? I simply don’t agree with what he has to say, so I’m choosing not to buy is record this go around. There are no shortage of artists who write good songs about universal themes that everyone can relate to no matter what side of the political spectrum they happen to land on. I’m just choosing to support those artists over Isbell. Do I not still have that prerogative?
February 10, 2020 @ 6:21 pm
If Hank Jr. released “When We Were Vampires” and “Tupelo” on a single album, I’d make fun of anyone who refused to buy that album just because Hank II is a racist moron.
February 10, 2020 @ 7:41 pm
I never said Isabel doesn’t have any good songs. Fun fact, I was an early advocate of His early solo work. I saw him play at a small auditorium In Duluth Georgia all the way back in 2011. I quite enjoyed it, and told anyone who would listen that he was worth checking out. But let’s face it, he has let his politics cloud his vision, and now he lives in an echo chamber. He likes to pretend that he writes songs for middle and rural America, but seems to know very little about the culture of those people. He’s a brilliant song writer, but seems to have lost touch with his roots. Not sure why you feel the need to drag Hank thru the mud, but he’s a national treasure who’s no more racist than any other person of his generation. And for the record, I’ve also been critical of Hanks politically charged songs as well. They never sound as good as his songs about whiskey, women and rowdy friends.
February 10, 2020 @ 7:53 pm
My “dragging Hank through the mud” is solely based on Hank’s (deeply dumb and racist) public statements, regarding Obama being “a Muslim,” and that the Speaker of the House meeting with Obama would be akin to Netanyahu meeting with Hitler.
I mean…if Isbell had ever compared Pelosi and Trump playing golf to Netanyahu and Hitler doing the same, you might even have a point!
As is…it just makes you seem like a snowflake who cares more about an artists politics than their art.
February 10, 2020 @ 8:22 pm
I give a reasonable well thought out diplomatic response to your comment, and your response is to call me a snowflake. This does nothing to help your point. I’ve already stated that I’m not surprised that isbell is a hard left kind of guy, and that I’d be disappointed if he wasn’t. Most of the best artistic minds always seem lean left in their political sensibilities. But, isbell is heavy handed and ham fisted in his approach. I couldn’t care less about his politics. What I care about is is overwhelming need to only preach to the choir. He’s better than this. He could be a unifying voice of a generation, but he chooses to be divisive and polarizing. It’s a waste, more than anything.
February 10, 2020 @ 8:34 pm
Let’s be clear, here:
My response to your defending Hank Jr. being a dumb racist moron, while claiming that you’ll refuse to buy the new Isbell album based on one song (which would only be called “hard left” by a precious little snowflake terrified of encountering an opposing an opinion) was to make fun of your double standard.
But sure, son.
Double down on your grievances, and then blame everyone who mocks you for doing so, rather than being a man.
February 11, 2020 @ 9:03 am
this isn’t about Hank jr now is it? You are for some reason offended that I’m choosing to pass on Isbells new record because he chooses to inject his divisive political point of view. You should man up and try to explain why you are so concerned about how I spend my hard earned money. Let me leave you with a quote from Charley Starr from Blackberry Smoke in case you don’t understand where it is I’m coming from:
“I DON’T THINK OUR FANS WANT TO HEAR ABOUT OUR POLITICS, WE”RE NOT WHAT YOU WOULD CALL A POLITICALLY CHARGED BAND. i FEEL LIKE OUR SHOW IS AN ESCAPE FOR PEOPLE TO GET AWAY FROM HOW SHITTY THE WORLD MIGHT BE AT THE MOMENT. THEY CAN COME FOR TWO HOURS AND TRY NOT WORRY” – Charley starr
this my friend is how it’s supposed to be done.
February 11, 2020 @ 9:36 am
You also just need to read the actual lyrics to the song…which, y’know, aren’t political at all, and are instead about an artist’s (and a human’s) obligation to constantly push and challenge themselves to express their truth, rather than coast by without any self-interrogation:
https://lyricsfa.com/2020/02/10/jason-isbell-and-the-400-unit-be-afraid-lyrics/
February 11, 2020 @ 11:38 am
there is no “their truth” there is only THE truth.
February 11, 2020 @ 4:34 pm
What a Democrat thing to say.
February 10, 2020 @ 5:26 pm
Sorry our president hurts your feelings every day and you feel the need to hate him, call him names, make fun of your fellow Americans who voted for him, and miss out of some of the best times out country has seen.
February 10, 2020 @ 6:33 pm
…huh?
I just said it’s dumb to deprive yourself of great music because you disagree with someone’s politics.
Even so…I’m deeply sorry if that triggered you, snowflake.
February 11, 2020 @ 6:15 am
Lol I called someone a snowflake on this site once and got blasted for being a homophobe hahaha. Nice to see the double standard.
February 11, 2020 @ 9:21 am
Well, son, the double standard is that you’re throwing a hissyfit about something that doesn’t actually affect you in any way.
February 11, 2020 @ 12:48 pm
No hissyfit thrown here, I just wanted to get in on the conversation. And in a way it doesn’t concern any of us, does it son?
February 10, 2020 @ 1:05 pm
The review seems to tell us more about the reviewer than it does about the song.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:40 pm
That’s because if you can’t go after the message, you go after the messenger.
February 19, 2020 @ 5:51 am
Musically it’s very average, I wouldn’t turn it off of it came on but I would not seek it out.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:07 pm
I just want a good story in a country song!
February 12, 2020 @ 5:48 am
I’ve stayed out of the comments related to this story because I don’t consider Isbell a country artist (neither Margo Price or Drive-By Truckers). My goal in the next decade is to drill down and focus on country and bluegrass music. With that said, Woody Guthrie, Willie Nelson, Johnny Cash, Steve Earle (for the most part) all were very political in their music, but conveyed that message through a story and let the listeners decipher the political meaning (if they go it at all). I like that about country music. This fictitious Americana genre is about emotion and preying upon righteous sentiment; it’s in your face preachy and not relatable.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:09 pm
I love the song! Jason has shown his merit as an artist, not just a cookie cutter Nashville “artist”. He’s earned the right to write his songs, *which have always been personal in nature* about whatever subject he chooses. Buy it or not, he doesn’t care. The man has been on a mission since “Southeastern”. Trigger… I’m a longtime reader of your blog, but I have to say that you are injecting a political opinion inside a review of a political song. Pot meet kettle.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:42 pm
What is the political opinion?
I have no political opinions aside from how politics is a scourge that is causing more problems than solving while siphoning billions of dollars from the American people that could actually be used to solve some of the problems politics create.
February 10, 2020 @ 3:31 pm
The fear of speaking out these days is not being shouldered by the left.
It is the kind of “all or nothing” ideology found in Jason Isbell’s “Be Afraid” that got Donald J. Trump elected President in the first place, and why he is very likely to be elected again.
I consider those statements to be political opinions.
February 10, 2020 @ 6:28 pm
There’s a big difference between social commentary and political commentary.
Likewise a big difference between political songs and social awareness songs.
The problem is that social songs and comments require insight years of observation and political comments are knee jerk criticisms of things that annoy you but probably don’t really matter.
February 10, 2020 @ 6:36 pm
This would be a much stronger argument if “Adults should be allowed to do what they like, as long as they don’t hurt anyone” and “Poor children shouldn’t starve to death or die from preventable illnesses” weren’t, in fact, political statements in 2020.
February 10, 2020 @ 6:42 pm
So the political commentry would say that someone is obviously wrong or right about something so we should support or hate as required, and the social commentry says “how the hell did we get here??, lets all relax. Maybe we don’t need ‘sides'”
February 10, 2020 @ 7:15 pm
Which of my statements do you think requires “years of observation” to determine the worthiness of?
February 10, 2020 @ 7:27 pm
Jeff Givens was implying that I was taking a political slant to my opinion, which is what I was refuting. I agree those statements are political in nature, but I believe them to be agnostic on political affiliation.
February 10, 2020 @ 6:27 pm
To be clear:
Thinking that the government should both have funds *and* use those funds to help Americans is a political opinion.
So is thinking that the government should let adults do whatever the hell they want, as long as it doesn’t hurt anybody.
What’s more…both of those opinions align damn closely with Isbell’s.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:14 pm
I don’t at all disagree with Jason Isbell’s politics.
I very much disagree with the fact that this song sounds like a mid-late period U2 song.
Like, if you don’t wanna be country anymore, that’s absolutely fine with me. I am very much not a genre-exclusive listener, to say the least. But of all the sounds to gravitate towards… that one? Not many people have very fond memories of post-millennium U2, Jason. And your voice isn’t Bono’s voice, either.
Also there’s a certain irony in recording a political message song and then mixing the vocals so low that you can barely hear the lyrics unless you’re really paying attention.
February 10, 2020 @ 3:19 pm
Yep – my only issue with the song is that it doesn’t sound very good, not the (entirely tame) lyrics.
Same thing goes for WMW, honestly.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:15 pm
No, shut up and sing. I dont want to hear your politics at all. And I despise being lectured by some twit on a stage. Being in show business does not make one smart, it just makes one arrogant it seems.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:22 pm
Aren’t you lectured to by some twit on stage every Sunday?
February 11, 2020 @ 3:25 am
Cheap shot about good men who hsppen to be ministers, but you have the right to say it. I’m not stopping you, but I’ll call you out on it. Many of them do NOT get political in the pulpit & don’t lecture people about those things….. just like music as well.
February 11, 2020 @ 6:21 am
Everything is politics.
February 11, 2020 @ 8:46 am
And I’d guess your politics fill the religion hole in your life.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:19 pm
I guess he isn’t much of a Ricky Gervais fan.
The only people he wants to speak out are those that agree with him. Anybody else isn’t allowed to. So boring at this point. Lazy songwriting.
Seeing how none of these political white knight musicians learned anything 4 years ago that people are done being lectured or talked down to, they’ll have yet another 4 years of Trump to look forward to. More liberal tears come November!
February 10, 2020 @ 1:19 pm
I don’t understand the lyrics. I don’t really get songs with these poetic messages which I can’t get my head around! I like country songs with a good story and with lyrics that I can comprehend straight away! My favourite’s are Conway Twitty, Marty Robbins, Mel Tillis, Johnny Paycheck and Tammy Wynette! Their songs are all really deep but not too complicated!
February 10, 2020 @ 1:53 pm
This is NOT country music.
February 10, 2020 @ 2:02 pm
Exactly!
February 10, 2020 @ 1:20 pm
Gee an artist with political leanings…somebody better tell Dylan, Mellencamp, CSNY, Bono, Kristofferson, Cash, and dozens of others that’s no way to have successful career. And yes that includes Isbell’s former band Drive By Truckers. Speaking of…if you can’t handle this song best stay away from the new DBT album The Unraveling and especially the song Thoughts and Prayers. Guaranteed to melt right wing snowflakes.
February 10, 2020 @ 6:16 pm
This and only this 24/7!
February 10, 2020 @ 1:24 pm
How about trying to review the song instead of a 1000 word essay on how butt hurt you are that artists don’t like Trump?
February 10, 2020 @ 7:36 pm
Didn’t mention anything about artists not liking Trump.
February 10, 2020 @ 8:04 pm
…you didn’t have to, though.
You’re a good dude, but this entire essay was a lengthy complaint about artists having the temerity to write songs about not liking that some politicians think that children should die because of who their parents are.
February 11, 2020 @ 3:31 am
That’s a totally low blow against Trigger & some good men. I would NOT consider Trigger to be a right-wing conservative based on his writings, comments, etc. Nor was he explicitly supporting Trump here. (For the record, I did NOT support or vote for Trump in EITHER the GOP primary or the general election. I didn’t consider him to be a true conservative or Republican, & I still don’t to an extent. Not sure what I’ll do this fall, to be honest…)
February 10, 2020 @ 1:26 pm
Conway Twitty never shared his political views! “99% song, 1% singer.” I love this interview from Conway: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8osbz1VnvBQ
February 10, 2020 @ 1:35 pm
You’re right; I totally never see any complaint or backlash when artists and musicians express left or left leaning opinions. LOL!.
February 10, 2020 @ 2:11 pm
Of course there’s backlash on both sides, but cancel culture is being perpetrated at the moment by the left, and often, on the left. That’s what were seeing happen to the Grammy Awards. A very left-leaning organization is getting destroyed for not being left enough. The issue with the right is the prevalence of corruption. The issue with the left is they eat their own.
February 10, 2020 @ 4:38 pm
I don’t know anything about the Grammys. Or cancel culture, to be honest. I just think that, if you read the original piece here, it sure doesn’t even suggest “backlash on both sides.” And I think that part was pretty disingenuous.
(To be clear, I do not disagree about backlash from the left getting to be ridiculous and a problem.)
February 12, 2020 @ 5:22 pm
Guy writes a pretty standard song, you find one ambiguous line and choose to get offended by it, share this exaggerated sense of offense and grievance to your many followers, some of whom promptly come to comment that they are boycotting the artist in question.
This is cancel culture.
February 12, 2020 @ 5:27 pm
Moses,
We have been over this point ad nauseum. Clearly we are hearing that line, and this song a different way. I feel like with the consensus from other members of the media of the song and the line being politically-charged, my point is not an unreasonable stance to take. Nonetheless, I respect your believe otherwise. Thanks for sharing your perspective here.
February 12, 2020 @ 5:54 pm
Isn’t the “consensus” you’re quoting from the kind of media takes that you frequently bash for using their reviews to insert their divisive politics into an arena you think should be free of it? You’re right we’ve been over it ad nauseam but your inability to see the irony or own your own role in the kind of shit stirring you profess to despise is nauseating.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:38 pm
Still trying to figure out what “the Americana music scene is”.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:54 pm
Americana music scene is pretty strong. Yes its absolutely grown to encompass a lot. Yes its kinda confusing for the general public. Yes it can be pretty woke at times. But its the home of American ROOTS music. Whether that is blues, soul, country, alternative rock, etc.
February 11, 2020 @ 1:13 pm
You proved my point. It is just a term that seems to change over time meaning to me it has no real meaning.
February 10, 2020 @ 1:43 pm
Dare I say that Jason is “Woke!”
February 10, 2020 @ 1:55 pm
couldn’t pay me to listen to this
February 10, 2020 @ 7:32 pm
But yet you’ll come leave a comment on a review of the song. Sounds like you’re really smart when it comes to using your time wisely.
February 12, 2020 @ 3:20 pm
hey Triggerman, your haters are having a good cry about this review over at r/altcountry too in case you missed it
February 12, 2020 @ 4:14 pm
Is that Reddit?
February 12, 2020 @ 4:29 pm
yup
https://www.reddit.com/r/altcountry/comments/f2lh4k/have_yall_seen_saving_country_musics_review_of/
February 10, 2020 @ 1:57 pm
It seems like lately, any song or album or artist that takes a political stance seems to be take a political stance seems to get taken to task by you, Trigger. It was the same with Will Hoge’s album “My American Dream.” “My American Dream” was not an album designed to change minds. It was an album designed to express anger and to let others who were angry know they aren’t alone.
Isbell is more than aware that it may have an effect on the number of records he sells:
“If I don’t do what I consider to be the right thing — which is speak my mind — I’m not gonna be able to sleep when I’m an old man, and I’m not gonna be able to speak to my kids about it,” Isbell told Rolling Stone Country in a wide-ranging interview in 2018. “I’d like to be able to say, ‘I did what I could, I did part of what I could,’ or you know, something that’s not just, ‘Well, I had records to sell, so I kept my mouth shut.’ I’ll never lose sleep over not selling more records, but I’ll definitely lose sleep over keeping my mouth shut and letting things happen to people who are minorities for whatever reason, be it gender or their race or their sexual preference or the fact that they ‘like science.’”
-Source (https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-country/jason-isbell-new-song-be-afraid-950171/)
But the truth is, 99% of Isbell’s fan base is aware of where he stands, agree with him, and aren’t going anywhere. The idea that Isbell or Swift or the Drive-By Truckers espousing their political beliefs and their anger in their music is going to drive the election in one direction or another is outlandish.
February 10, 2020 @ 2:09 pm
I literally posted that same exact quote from the Rolling Stone Country interview into this review, and on purpose.
Again, I don’t have a problem with political stances. This is what I have a problem with, also from Rolling Stone Country.
QUOTE:
“To Isbell, writing empty songs or making vacuous art is the worst one can do at this point in American history. “If your words add up to nothing then you’re making a choice, to sing a cover when we need a battle cry,” he sings.”
So literally writing a song that allows people to decompress from all the political rancor is “the worst one can do at this point in American history ?!?” And who gets to jusge what is “vacuous” and “empty,” Isbell? That’s fucking bullshit, and one of the biggest affronts to the institution of music I’ve ever seen. Sorry.
February 10, 2020 @ 2:49 pm
Trigger, you’re quoting your own interpretation of a quote Isbell made 2 years ago, and implying that he said it. He didn’t say “the worst one can do at this point in American history,” you did. He didn’t say “empty” or “vacuous,” you did.
Come on, this is the same kind of piss poor journalism you regularly decry from other outlets.
February 10, 2020 @ 2:54 pm
Sorry, you weren’t quoting yourself, you were quoting the RS article again. But still, those aren’t Jason’s words, they belong to RS.
February 10, 2020 @ 5:25 pm
Then Isbell should come out and denounce those assertions by RS, right?
If he remains silent, welllll……….
February 10, 2020 @ 7:38 pm
I understand. However, it illustrates that I wasn’t the only one to draw these political narratives from this song. So did Rolling Stone. So did many others who are arguing here in their defense.
February 10, 2020 @ 7:41 pm
Also, NPR also selected out that specific quote.
“Later, Isbell pointedly criticizes artists for not speaking their minds more forcefully: “If your words add up to nothing / Then you’re making a choice to sing a cover when you need a battle cry.”
https://www.npr.org/2020/02/10/804470772/jason-isbell-and-the-400-unit-announce-new-album-release-be-afraid?utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=nprmusic&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_term=music
I don’t believe I misinterpreted the line, though I do believe Rolling Stone embellished it.
February 11, 2020 @ 9:52 am
You weren’t the only one to draw out the political narrative. But you’re complaining about it like this is something new and he hasn’t had political messages in his music before. He very much has.
February 11, 2020 @ 12:33 pm
Again, as I have said many, many times before. It’s NOT the “political narrative.” It’s Jason Isbell commanding people to get political in their music, and insinuating that otherwise, they’re music is worthless and they part of the problem that makes this song exceptional. Also, I am not complaining about this like it’s something new. I have said this over, and over, and over again, and specifically about Jason Isbell’s music. I have been extremely consistent on this topic.
In 2018 when the editor of Rolling Stone Country wrote an article called, “Why It’s Time For Country Artists To Speak Up About Trump,” I very directly criticized it, with a lot of the same exact arguments made here.
You can read here:
https://www.savingcountrymusic.com/rolling-stone-country-breaks-promise-to-not-get-political/
February 10, 2020 @ 2:01 pm
The irony is that people who think and preach like him are hailed as creative, yet if everyone thought and believed the exact same way like they want, creativity wouldn’t exist.
February 10, 2020 @ 2:02 pm
‘If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem’! Are people just supposed to sit back and take the flack. Fair play Jason, Rock on!
February 10, 2020 @ 2:10 pm
100% agreed. It’s not a good song. For all his past insight into the lives of regular people, especially people going through difficult times, this is completely tone deaf. Isbell needs to spend less time on Twitter and his Nashville mansion and maybe a little more time with his people in Northwestern Alabama.
February 10, 2020 @ 2:11 pm
I get it. I just the miss the story telling. That meant something to me at least. Hopefully this won’t be representative of the entire album.
February 10, 2020 @ 2:21 pm
I read the lyrics as he is having a conversation with himself and motivating himself to voice his convictions. You are trying to take in his politics as an attack on you. The argument that he is being condescending in telling other musicians what they should and shouldn’t do isn’t there. He is talking about himself and the length of time it has taken to get there. Besides, this blog rails against musicians on a regular basis. We are in the middle of an uncivil war and JI has announced what side he has chosen. You have done the same
February 10, 2020 @ 4:42 pm
I actually got more of this vibe from it too. That he’s talking to himself rather than calling out other artists. Especially since the “you” in the part about barking at the guy tuning your guitar does seem to be him speaking to/of himself. But of course I don’t know which way it was intended.
February 10, 2020 @ 7:44 pm
Bill,
The same take I have on the line, “If your words add up to nothing / Then you’re making a choice to sing a cover when you need a battle cry.”
…is the same take Rolling Stone, NPR, and other outlets have taken. I understand that lines can be interpreted different ways. But I believe I interpreted it the way it will be taken by most listeners. That is also why many people are defending the line as a political statement.
February 11, 2020 @ 10:37 am
Bill, I have a similar opinion. I scrolled through the comments to see if anyone else had posted this thought before posting it myself and I found what you wrote. I’ll add that I thought of Isbell’s song “Anxiety” on the previous album where he’s talking to himself about his own fears and uncertainties.
February 10, 2020 @ 2:45 pm
Man. This sounds like the remaining members of the Gin Blossoms and Goo Goo Dolls got together to form a “supergroup” to help pay the bills.
February 10, 2020 @ 2:56 pm
When you’re late to the party there’s an urge to overcompensate in order to prove you were there all along. The end result is often not pretty. Some can resist the urge. Some can’t, and this is what you get. I’ll still listen, comfortable in the knowledge that it’s is just one more chip in the wall of woke/cancel culture.
February 11, 2020 @ 2:48 pm
OK Boomer
February 11, 2020 @ 3:42 pm
Never got that one before–for reasons that would be obvious if you actually knew me. I don’t use the phrase myself because it is a big, bright sign of ignorance.
February 10, 2020 @ 3:00 pm
Sound wise, it’s like a strange mesh of Springsteen and Gin Blossoms. I don’t hate it.
Lyrically, it’s like listening to a political Facebook rant in song. It you want to sing about American politics, you fail badly as soon as you paint a black and white picture and ignore the shades of gray.
February 10, 2020 @ 3:06 pm
So apparently a Brent Cobb album was released this past Friday…
February 10, 2020 @ 3:09 pm
It’s a reissue. You can read about it on Saving Country Music.
February 10, 2020 @ 4:59 pm
Well damn I was enjoying thinking he had gotten back to a more country sound. I like his new stuff, but this reissue is more to my liking.
February 10, 2020 @ 3:07 pm
Kids in cages, consistent abject lies, taking cues from foreign maniacs, roll back of women’s fuckin rights, calling neo Nazi’s good people, the most disgraceful anti- american bs to ever leave a reality star ‘s lips. I dunno man. I’m a conservative and this is BS- if you’re not critical of politics you’re profiting from it or something’s wrong with you.
I’d call this review ‘critic of a genre that probably doesn’t exist anymore outside of nostalgia feels judged enough to write an essay’. I love your stuff- this one’s not my favorite.
February 10, 2020 @ 3:12 pm
What does any of that have to do with artists choosing to get political in their music? Why do musicians have to pay for the ills of the Trump Administration? Go after Trump, not some songwriter who just wants to write stuff to help folks forget about all the bullshit in the world.
This comment just underlined how everything has just become a proxy war against Trump.
February 10, 2020 @ 9:26 pm
Well, this ended up in the wrong section- probably my bad. Supposed to follow your ‘history will judge this period kindly’ remark. I hope that context is clear now, but reading the previous comments it seems it may not be for you. Lot of people feel like this will be a ‘where were you’ moment in our american history. I believe art should be threatening and interesting and compelling and complicated and beautiful, as opposed to the contemporary regurgitation of a few clichés that is the bulk of pop , country, and pop country- same goes for the voices, the look, the type of playing that’s allowed to make it to radio. Some people choose to do ‘the right thing ‘ for their career- safe commercial moves, sexy outfits- and we all gotta eat- some ethically cannot, and isbell seems to be in that camp at this point. He has a mic and he’s encouraging others like him to use their’s- it’s telling who feels threatened by this. Or he’s just telling a fucking story- he does that often.
February 10, 2020 @ 8:57 pm
“Kids in cages, abject lies, taking cues from foreign maniacs, roll back of women’s fuckin rights, calling neo Nazi’s good people…”
Please cite your sources.
February 11, 2020 @ 9:17 am
This is extremely disheartening to read, as an American. I’m not here to educate you- that’s your job, and your responsibility in this partisan media environment. I like this site, I like this writer, I like the comments section, and I like music that’s not zippidy do da my truck beer o’clock. This freakshow for the wealthy that my Republican party has become was worth referencing in the context of Trigg’s comment, as referenced above.
February 11, 2020 @ 2:57 pm
Cite sources? Have you been paying attention to the world at all the past three years? You don’t need sources. You need to open your eyes and ears.
February 11, 2020 @ 3:54 pm
Cobra, I agree, “Madwolf” just needs to take a look around. I was going to advise Madwolf to open up a newspaper but then I thought you’d “ok boomer” me for saying ‘newspaper’ (lol)
February 10, 2020 @ 3:14 pm
This is the type of song that loses Isbell for me, and it has nothing to do with politics.
Vapid throwaway soft rock. Not sure I agree with the assessment of the message in the lyrics, but can’t really hear the lyrics anyway, so…
February 10, 2020 @ 3:30 pm
I didn’t care for the song, the melody, or the message. The last three records have been pretty spotty imho, and this is coming from a guy that has been on the Isbell bandwagon since the Trucker days. I will probably buy the album in some format, but I think he’s fading a bit
February 10, 2020 @ 3:39 pm
The thing is though: This song doesn’t take a specific ideological stance or suggest what or how any artist or individual should use their platform. It doesn’t even really “express a political belief” or “call other artists to (any specific) action”. Atleast not explicitly or ideologically, anyway. If taken at face value, you could say this song is about the nature of producing meaningful work in the medium of song writing/craft. That if you’re going to use a communicated medium then it should be done to communicate something, to the best of one’s ability, with the impact or lack thereof in mind, lest it become insincere, watered down or meaningless.
It even seems as if Isbell is kind of reconciling this himself in the song. Listen to the lyrics of the second verse with this in mind and it seems very obvious to me atleast, that he seems to be reminding himself (and others?) to be accountable for the work they produce. But at no point is that spelled out in an ideological nature or overly politicized.
I feel like this review runs away a little bit with its own interpretation and places the blame for that interpretation on Isbell. This song seems to me to be brilliantly crafted in such a way that the narrative is one explicit thing and the political undertones are never made explicit. Perhaps, knowing people will make up there own minds on what the deeper meaning is. Maybe it’s not him that’s guilty of the type of politicization of music that seems to be suggested in the multiple discussions ive seen surrounding this song. But the rest of us, who are so quick to find some political or ideological meaning in everything that we interpret it’s figurative meaning before allowing the actual narrative to just be what it is. I’m sure Isbell had some intentions regarding the political and social undertones but I also think he was very careful to leave it open to interpretation, as not to make it alienating. I think he managed to do this with a delicate skill that few could manage.
February 10, 2020 @ 7:46 pm
Again, the same take I have on the line, “If your words add up to nothing / Then you’re making a choice to sing a cover when you need a battle cry” is the same take numerous other outlets and many of Isbell’s fans are taking from it. It might not be how you interpret it, and we all can interpret lyrics differently. But I don’t think my interpretation is incorrect.
February 10, 2020 @ 7:57 pm
Trigger,
Am i still in Time Out? …
February 10, 2020 @ 11:19 pm
I didn’t know you were in timeout to begin with.
February 10, 2020 @ 8:36 pm
I’m not sayin your interpretation is wrong, or even that i disagree. Just that it’s one interpretation of a line which is very apolitical and ideologically nonspecific. I actually wholeheartedly agree with much of what you said in the review, just think that it’s a bit much to put it on Isbell for what seems like a fairly benign political statement compared to the song’s actual narrative. This isnt exactly the Dead Kennedy’s. Besides this review, I’ve been seein people writing him off and kinda losing their shit over a song which, to me, doesn’t draw a real hard line, IMO. People are politicizing it more than he seems to be. When I first listened I heard it from the pov of a fan who is disillusioned with the content and/or attitude of and artist they otherwise enjoyed and respected. Someone whose pissed off and afraid they are losing someone/something they connected to, to more mundane, cookie cutter market driven elements. The second or third time I heard the political undertones but didn’t have the lyrics in front of me so it took a second, and I thought of it as a double meaning or implied metaphor, which just made the content stronger. And even if i got it totally wrong and this was a blatant call out anthem, i think he went about it in about as tasteful a manner one could. I just feel like we’re all making too much of it.
February 10, 2020 @ 3:54 pm
Kinda curious about what psychology says about people that try so hard to make themselves a hero. I wonder if his so serious sense of righteousness and responsibility comes partly from his past lack there of.
February 10, 2020 @ 4:04 pm
Maybe he is back on the sauce?
February 11, 2020 @ 7:49 am
You talking about Donnie?
February 11, 2020 @ 9:06 am
No.
He reminds me of a multiple people I’ve known who are recovering addicts. They often seem to lecture the hardest. And seem to be more trying to convince themselves (based on insecurity) than the other person. They become obsessed with it. That’s just based on personal observation (And no offense meant – getting your life back on track no matter how you do it is challenging). The people I’ve known often find a slightly different channel of lifestyle to lecture about. JI doesn’t attack drinkers directly, but seems to be waging a war on those who he has perceived to be acting irresponsibly. I could be totally wrong. Just an impression, and psychology is something I’m curious about.
February 11, 2020 @ 10:35 am
Oh! I think I misunderstood what you were getting at in the first post. I thought you were just taking shots at him, and it struck me as fitting to someone else, too.
That’s an interesting thought. I don’t know enough about the subject to comment, but seems like it could have some merit.
February 11, 2020 @ 10:48 am
It’s sympathetic, but it might still be a shot. I generally take issue with the overly sanctimonious and divisive.
February 10, 2020 @ 4:03 pm
Wonder what I’d find on the Facebook and twitter feeds of the commenters on here bemoaning Isbell’s politics infringing on the reality vacation they’ve found in country music?
February 10, 2020 @ 4:04 pm
Isbell acts like those American citizens he claims to speak for are all being locked up.
They are not. More hysteria.
I am sure he (like the rest of the Left) ignores how their god FDR locked up American citizens during WW2 because of their Japanese heritage.
The song lacks any sort of value.
February 12, 2020 @ 10:51 am
The left does not ignore that nor do we defend that. In fact, I’m a big fan of the quote that “those who do not learn their history are doomed to repeat it.”
.
Your comment is just another example of the right’s obsession with “whataboutisms.” Instead of acknowledging that Trump is a lousy president and an even worse human being, you resort to trying to justify it because someone else did something similar. You can’t defend the man, so instead, you deflect. I’m not falling for it, though. I won’t defend FDR interning Japanese-American citizens, but I also won’t let you use it as a way to justify to me the Orange Buffoon, either. Try again.
February 12, 2020 @ 6:09 pm
Bullshit.
I have seen it either defended or routinely ignored in history books.
President Trump is a great president. The economy is going strong and he finally puts America First unlike Obummer.
February 13, 2020 @ 5:20 pm
You’re are ridiculous. The economy is going strong? Just because the stock market is doing well doesn’t mean the economy is doing well. It means it’s doing well for those who can afford to invest. There are still millions of people who still have to work two full time jobs just to barely make ends meet. The wealth disparity has never been greater.
.
And Trump does not put America first. He puts Trump first. He cares only about himself. And all his bullshit about “I’m bringing jobs back to America” doesn’t add up to shit because he still makes his own products overseas. When is he going to bring THOSE jobs back to America? Shit, even his MAGA Klan hoods are made in China.
.
The fact that you think Trump is a great president just proves how dumb you really are.
February 10, 2020 @ 4:24 pm
Most people who are passionate about politics that I have known, are some of the most miserable people that I have been around.
February 10, 2020 @ 4:28 pm
I don’t agree with most of what’s written here. But I also don’t like this particular bent in Isbells music. I can’t quite put my finger on why. I lean more his way politically, and I don’t have a problem with his social media and whatnot. But these songs don’t work. I think he’s just not very good at this. He just comes off preachy and superior. And this is from someone who mostly agrees with him. White mans world is just not a good song, even if I’m not bothered by the sentiment (which I’m not.) This song is a little better (and does have a couple of great turns of phrase), but by Isbell standards, it’s meh. I don’t mind Hope the High Road. Maybe because it feels a little more positive instead of like a scolding.
I just kind of wish he’d stick with the sort of thing he is unquestionably GREAT at. That makes me fall in love with music. But If he truly feels compelled to use his available opportunity to do this, something he sees as important, I’m not gonna tell him he shouldn’t. (I think the “shut up and sing” crowd is causing him to double down like this much the way the opposite examples are described here. So knock it off and maybe we can all get back to just enjoying Isbell lol.)
February 10, 2020 @ 5:21 pm
“He just comes off preachy and superior.”
Nail on the head. I have mostly similar values to him, I think. But he’s blowing both the issues and his heroic virtue way out of proportion.
February 11, 2020 @ 7:02 am
so… I read this article before listening to the song because it’s hard for me to listen to music at work. But I want to amend my thoughts a little. Upon subsequent listens, And listening this morning with fresh ears, I think this article led to me hearing this as more political than it actually is. I’m going to have to agree with others’ comments that its just not really all that political or polarizing. Its also grown on me as a song a bit. Not my fave, but I suppose they can’t all be Elephant. Guess I learned my lesson to go to the music before the commentary.
February 11, 2020 @ 8:28 am
Comment posted here just this morning.
“I’m very proud of Jason and how he has used his incredible talent to address the horrible mess that faces us as a nation. Those here that fail to appreciate his efforts choose to ignor the damage being done to America by the far right wing ego maniacal swine currently heading the government. His music is a wake up call to all and has obviously struck a nerve. Hopefully it will.”
I agree the song may not be as overtly political as it may seem with all the discussion swirling around it. But the vast majority of people are taking it, to use Isbell’s own words, as a “battle cry.” And funny how the tolerant and peaceful among us are the ones using militaristic rhetoric.
And again, I can’t emphasize this enough. The issue here is not that “Be Afraid” is a political song. The issue is it’s a political song that passes severe judgement upon artists who chose to not use their music to get political. This is what separates it from other political songs, this is what was highlighted and underscored in this article, and what the vast majority of people seem to want to sidestep when addressing it.
February 11, 2020 @ 8:58 am
Except that it’s barely a political song, and “passes severe judgment upon artists” is your (and others’) interpretation of a single line in the song.
The more I read the lyrics, the more I see it as talking to himself, telling himself to speak up and do the right thing even though he’s afraid. I see no “severe judgment” whatsoever.
February 11, 2020 @ 9:31 am
Yeah, the lyrics could just as easily be about the process of writing Cover Me Up as a political song.
It’s essentially that if you don’t use music and songwriting to tell the truth, even one that scares you, you’re failing yourself as an artist and a person.
February 11, 2020 @ 7:11 pm
This comment really nails it for me. There is no severe judgement in this song, except for those that are trying too hard to look for it. It’s practically milquetoast. This site bemoans the interjection or divisive politics into music, but that’s exactly what’s been done here by the reviewer, not the artist. Witness all the people commenting that they won’t buy another Isbell album. I wonder how many read this before they even listened to the song. It’s sad that political hot takes matter more than music here, but I guess that’s how it goes these days.
February 10, 2020 @ 4:56 pm
*effect change
February 10, 2020 @ 4:58 pm
What’s with all these highly regarded traditional artists tapping into the rock/indie folk genre…. Tyler Childers, Whiskey Myers, Sturgill , and now Jason Isbell ???
It’s a no from me dawg.. I’ll stick with Pardi, Watson, and CoJo
February 10, 2020 @ 5:46 pm
Whiskey Myers has never been traditional country.
February 10, 2020 @ 6:22 pm
I thought their latest album was rock?
I never listened to them before.. But Trig has highlighted them often on this site, so I’m assuming their earlier work was “country” ?
February 10, 2020 @ 6:44 pm
They’ve always been unabashed Southern Rock, far more so than BlackBerry Smoke
February 12, 2020 @ 4:20 pm
Whiskey Myers have never been traditional country. That much is true. They have, however, always been better at country than they are at southern rock. I hope they eventually make a complete switch, or at least reverse the percentages and do more country than southern rock.
February 10, 2020 @ 8:44 pm
I mean, Isbell spend the first huge chuck of his career playing in the Drive by Truckers. Not exactly traditional country. This sounds far more like what he was doing 10-15 yrs ago.
February 11, 2020 @ 1:20 pm
Its called alternative country and Isbell was among the many famous acts especially for the genre’s rise in the early 2000’s
February 10, 2020 @ 5:54 pm
With respect….
Artists give their listeners the great gift of speaking their truth, so that the listener can use music to process their feelings about what is going in the world today, love, the desire to get fucked up on a Saturday night, etc.
There are a lot of us out here that are seeing things that we can’t abide. I don’t need to catalog it all here. It is the nature of artists to speak up when their consciences are offended. To make the argument that music hasn’t changed hearts and minds is to forget Bob Dylan, Woody Guthrie, Pete Seeger and Nina Simone. By doing so, these artists helped people who were going through some shit feel less alone in it. Maybe they even convinced a person or two. And though there may not be a social cost to the artist for speaking their truth, there is often a cost to the listener. If you’re a liberal in a small southern town, or gay in a small southern town, there can be a social cost, and having a song that can help keep you company in the loneliness of your ideological or sexual isolation is a comfort. Sometimes art is for listener and not the artist.
And it’s not as though Jason Isbell hasn’t shown insight into for protagonists that probably would voted in a way a liberal wouldn’t appreciate. Go back and listen to “Last Of My Kind” from the last album. I feel pretty sure who that character would have voted for. The song drips with empathy for a person who doesn’t recognize how he fits into a world that is moving too fast for him.
I understand some of points you are making, but this reads to me kind of like you’re suggesting that he shut up and sing. He needn’t moderate his voice in an effort to weigh the tactical effects of his expression, and he should not if his conscience demands speaking out. What a great loss if Nina Simone had sung “Mississippi You Are Slightly Bumming Me Out” instead of “Mississippi Goddam.” It’s an angry song that didn’t bring the white and black people of that state together, but gave succor to those who were being denied access to schooling, the right to vote, etc. Or was Nina Simone just being too damn uppity and therefore setting the cause back?
If Jason Isbell thinks wants to shake his fist in the air, then we should probably not discourage him. We don’t have to all agree with him, nor we all have to agree about the efficacy in him doing so. But I feel pretty clear that we should not be suggesting that our artists (and some of greatest ones at that) moderate themselves in speaking about what’s in their hearts and minds.
February 10, 2020 @ 9:22 pm
Hey David,
Generally speaking, I agree with most everything you’ve said here. My only qualms would be two things.
1) “To make the argument that music hasn’t changed hearts and minds is to forget Bob Dylan, Woody Guthrie, Pete Seeger and Nina Simone.
I’m not making that argument whatsoever. I definitely think music has, can, and will change hearts and minds, and that’s why I think we must respect the institution of music as a place where everyone can feel welcome, except for those who needs their cages rattled.
2) I do think that over the years, Jason Isbell has taken a smart approach to his songwriting and broaching difficult subjects. The specific line in this specific song that severely bothering me is, “If your words add up to nothing / Then you’re making a choice to sing a cover when you need a battle cry.” Not only myself, but Rolling Stone, NPR, and other outlets have selected this line out of the song specifically, and all of us agree this is a call to action of other artists, as well as a passing of judgement on artists who don’t answer that call. This is where I have the problem. I know many songwriters and performers who don’t want to get political with their music, including many who I’ve heard from today, and they shouldn’t feel either ostracized or pressured into getting political with their music just because the King of Americana compels them to, while implying their music “adds up to nothing” if they don’t.
I still think Jason Isbell is one of the greatest songwriters of our time, have said as such twice in the last week in print before I’d heard this song, and that opinion has not changed whatsoever. I look forward to his new album. But I don’t want artists to feel pressured to do anything they don’t want to do just to conform to a politically-charged Americana ideal set by Jason Isbell and others. For me, this is a red line.
February 12, 2020 @ 12:00 pm
Trig,
You keep saying over and over again that this is the line that bugs you, yet you complain constantly about songs and music that hold no substance. This line doesn’t necessarily need to be taken in the context of politics: it can be taken as a critique of any form of music (or art or speech) that is just singing or talking for the sake of singing or talking.
It could just as easily be a complaint about the latest Luke Bryan song singing about the same meaningless empty rehashed pop that he has sung about a hundred times before.
And yes, i get that you are taking it politically, and in the context of the song, there likely is a political undertone to it. But you’re choosing to take that as the only meaning. You’re choosing to take offense when all Isbell has done is to make a song of substance.
February 12, 2020 @ 4:25 pm
I understand your point when referencing “their truth” but the idea of truth being a moving target between individuals causes more disarray and disaster in our world than we realize. It’s why many people don’t heal from their past experiences. It’s why many people drop into addictions that end up defining their lives.
We keep using phrases like “my truth” in terms of how we feel because of bad experiences. That should be looked at as a problem because then we use that “truth” to cast a far-too-wide umbrella, and then we make objectively untrue blanket statements about certain topics with the protection of “this happened to that person, so don’t correct them or encourage them to seek healing.”
Convoluted, I know, but the point is this: we shouldn’t encourage individual “truths” so broadly and openly. We should encourage the understanding that we all have our own individual experiences, but we’re still responsible for our own healing.
February 10, 2020 @ 6:09 pm
Wait’ll you guys hear about Dylan, Woody Guthrie, CSNY, Bob Marley, Joni Mitchell, Pete Seeger, Lennon & Willie. You’re gonna be SUPER angry. Lock em up huh?
February 10, 2020 @ 6:33 pm
Down-looking, stereotypical take on people whose opinion is different than yours from someone who either didn’t read this review, or doesn’t want to bother understanding its points.
February 10, 2020 @ 6:45 pm
Or someone who has both read the article and absolutely hears your point (after all, you make the same point every few weeks) but feels you have a one dimensional take anytime the subject is politics, race or sex. Love it when you stick to music tho… xo
February 10, 2020 @ 6:16 pm
Usually agree with you but you have badly mischaracterized the song. It’s a song about being true to yourself, not a sonh advocating a specific point of view. If you didn’t know Jason’s politics already, you still wouldn’t after listening to the thing.
I don’t even think it’s that great. But this take is just lousy if you listen to the actual lyrics. Lazy analysis.
February 10, 2020 @ 7:08 pm
So let me get this straight. It’s being called an “urgent anthem” and “rallying cry” by press, condemns not speaking up (a la Trent Reznor to Taylor Swift), and clearly refers to speaking about politics via the “shut up and sing” line. But… you’re saying to listen to the lyrics because it’s actually about being “true to yourself”… perhaps like a hallmark card? Ok
You do have a point about if you didn’t know his politics though….but at this point it’s pretty hard not to.
February 11, 2020 @ 9:10 am
“Shut up and sing” is the only political reference in the song, and even that line can easily be re-interpreted to other contexts as a generic “stay in your lane”-type of expression.
February 11, 2020 @ 9:27 am
If you only read read it at surface level…then, sure.
February 10, 2020 @ 9:11 pm
If I have badly mischaracterized the song, so did Rolling Stone, so did NPR, so did other outlets, so did a dozen or so Jason Isbell fans in this very comments section. I have seen this argument from a few, but I think my interpretation of the controversial line in this song is the same that the vast majority of people’s interpretations on both sides of the political spectrum. You may have a different take and I respect that, but I don’t think mine is out of bounds whatsoever.
February 10, 2020 @ 11:06 pm
Trigger,
I don’t think you intended to badly mischaracterize the song. As you mention, NPR, Rolling Stone, and others pointedly lofted the quote in question for effect. In my humble opinion, I think they did so vis-à-vis cherry picking the phrase that most aligns with the message they want from Isbell’s songs.
I think that your acerbic commentary is more of a reaction to their (NPR, Rolling Stone, et al) hype, than it is to the actual intent of the song. Furthermore, if we are to be honest, this is an issue you’ve taken unbridge with many times over, and maybe you’ve reached your breaking point.
In effort to keep us on the honesty bandwagon, the song is not that great musically, and does ring familiar when compared to his earlier catalog.
You aren’t too far off in your sentiment, but I wonder if the astute fans of the English language are keen enough notice your own partisan politics creep in, despite your argument of the contrary?
Isbell was slightly, or maybe more, political here, but not enough to warrant such a heavy-handed reaction. He’s always exhibited a liberal bias, even in songs favored by the “right,” i.e., Dress Blues/Tour of Duty, so where was this ire over his politics in years past?
I’m sure you will reach for the same quote again, but please know that some of us see through that vieled attempt to hide your own politics, but no judgement here, Trigger. As much as I disagree with your review of this song, I will still continue to read this blog ’cause you have an uncanny ability to raise an array of topics to the top of the heap… Including this one. I can only hope longtime fans of Isbell can continue to do the same with his music.
February 10, 2020 @ 11:47 pm
After I posted this review, there has been a myriad of attempts to poke holes in it, without addressing the elephant in the room, which is what I decided to do with the review. I’m politically bias, I have a beef with Isbell, I’m a redneck who voted for Trump and loves Toby Keith, so forth and so on, all of which are easily refutable if you know my writing over 12 years and nearly 6,000 articles. It’s tough enough to defend the opinions I share and the stances I take. It’s really frustrating when people expect you to defend things you didn’t say, or come at you with assumptions, and attempt to kill the messenger because they can’t refute the message.
“I think that your acerbic commentary is more of a reaction to their (NPR, Rolling Stone, et al) hype, than it is to the actual intent of the song.”
This is incorrect. I take the business of reviewing music very, very seriously. I choose my words wisely. This morning when I first hear the song, I listened to it multiple times. I jotted down the words because they’re hard to hear, and I wanted to know specifically what they were. Then I stepped away for a bit. Then I listen to it again and started compositing a review. Then I stepped away again, got the John Moreland album review finished and posted, and then came back to the Jason Isbell song. It wasn’t until I was virtually finished with the review that I decided it would be smart to see if Isbell had been interviewed or was saying anything specific about the song, and that is when I pulled up the Rolling Stone review. I didn’t see the NPR article until this evening. I never read other people’s opinions and then allow them to color my own. I will at times talk about other reviews, but only after I have solidified my own opinions autonomously.
” I wonder if the astute fans of the English language are keen enough notice your own partisan politics creep in, despite your argument of the contrary?”
There is no partisanship. I hate all politics equally.
“He’s always exhibited a liberal bias, even in songs favored by the “right,” i.e., Dress Blues/Tour of Duty, so where was this ire over his politics in years past?”
This is another attempt at claiming hypocrisy that’s just not true. Here are the first three paragraphs of my review of “The Nashville Sound”:
“Look, if Jason Isbell had asked my advice—which if he ever had the notion, I’m sure he’d glance over to the mantle where the Grammy Awards sit and consider himself good—then I would have told him what I would tell any music artist: you’re better off not broaching overtly political subjects with your music because ultimately all it will do is alienate 50% of potential listeners, and do little to no good for whatever ideology you’re attempting to espouse. And it doesn’t matter what your political stripes are, that assessment would be the same.
That’s not to be mistaken with the idea that musical artists don’t have a right to espouse their political ideologies through their music. Of course they do. In certain musical disciplines such as folk and reggae and punk, it’s almost required, and has been a long-standing element of those musical mediums. It’s the job of artists to act like mirrors and sound boards of their time, and our current time and place is a highly-charged political environment.
Still, why go there? Why ostensibly withhold your music from so many people just because you want to attempt to slide even some passing political message across? And specific to the premise Jason Isbell’s song “White Man’s World,” I guess I just don’t understand why we constantly have to identify ourselves and others through their race, gender, sexual orientation, et al. Perhaps it’s just the Gen X’er in me that was taught to see through race and gender. Now all of a sudden it’s hip to classify everyone, and systematically downgrade the Caucasian experience as incapable of understanding the true struggle of others.”
https://www.savingcountrymusic.com/song-review-jason-isbell-the-400-unit-be-afraid/
People will continue to pilfer holes in this review however they can, and specially coming after me as opposed to my opinions. But there is a deeper discussion to be had here. And yes, I picked out one line, because when I wrote it down early this morning, I found it shocking and alarming. It’s also the same line others pulled out of the song as the biggest takeaway from it. I stand behind my opinions on this song 100%, and that they are objective, and offered constructively.
I also appreciate everyone else’s opinion, and am glad they’re sharing in the discussion.
February 11, 2020 @ 8:40 am
Trigger, what you are describing is emblematic of the culture war going on right now. It’s not about left or right (though both “sides” handle it slightly different). There are plenty of people on the left and right that agree that current state of discourse on these topics is not based in the topics at all. Debate has been replaced by mischaracterization, ad hominem attacks and identity politics. There is no way to actually discuss anything these days, with anyone who engages in that type of behavior.
What’s scary, to a growing number of people, both “left” and “right,” is the slide into authoritarian, circular firing squad cancel culture mentality. It may be only one line in a song, but this one line is emblematic of everything else above. Considering most journalists will embrace this line, let alone challenge it, makes your willingness to discuss this very refreshing. It’s the people that do question cancel culture that are the brave ones. Not some totally celebrated and encouraged virtue signaling entertainer.
February 12, 2020 @ 5:52 am
I think the advice you’d like to have given him about not broaching overtly political subjects is excellent – but they think they are legitimately speaking out against the worst man this or most any other country has seen. One problem is they talked that way about Romney (who they now love), McCain/Palin, W./Cheney. Bill Maher actually has admitted and apologized for the hyperbole against the others “cause this time it’s real”.
When Corrosion of Conformity released their first album in 13 years a couple years back they were asked if they addressed Trump in the lyrics and Pepper basically said, “Not at all overtly cause our music’s gonna be around a lot longer than that motherfucker”. Good advice
February 12, 2020 @ 4:49 pm
They were stenciling Hitler mustaches on both John McCain and Mitt Romney when they ran for President. Barack Obama was a Muslim terrorist who was going to enact Sharia Law. Donald Trump is a Russian asset being directed by Putin. These are the kind of completely irrational and unhinged ideas that get forwarded through politics because people can’t handle being on the losing side, and seethe. That is why I always advocate for caution when broaching politics in music. It’s too emotional and irrational, and rarely ages well. Jason Isbell compelling other artists to get political or have their own efforts or morals questioned crossed a big line with me. All these people acting like this is the worst time in Americana history when it doesen’t even come close to the Civil War, the Vietnam and Civil Rights era, or even the race riots of the 90’s will look like fools by the cool-minded judgement of time. The President says a lot of stupid shit. But the National Guard is not in the streets. Everyone just needs to take a deep breath, and listen to some music.
February 10, 2020 @ 6:22 pm
These people seem to all have collectively knocked their heads and WOKE up in a fantasy where they are Star Wars rebels fighting the Emperor. I got into outlaw country as a kid because I identified with their self-made and can-do attitude. I did not get into country to be lectured by some self-important douche. Pass.
February 10, 2020 @ 6:29 pm
The good news is this crap from Isbell is (almost) the furthest thing from country one can imagine. So at least he isn’t muddying the waters from that perspective.
February 10, 2020 @ 6:28 pm
Musically their isn’t much to work with here. It sounds like a bad alternative record. The lyrics sound angry and leave a lot to be desired. I’m going to reserve judgement until I hear the rest of the record.
I sure hope this doesn’t end up like the new Drive By Truckers record. So political it becomes unbearable to listen to.
February 10, 2020 @ 6:46 pm
I agree with all of this. I probably share a lot of his politics but I am so tired of being lectured as I think are most people. It’s starting to lose any meaning to throw your views into absolutely everything and everything. I’ve also really tried to like Isbell and still find him boring af. So there’s that.
February 10, 2020 @ 8:32 pm
Couldn’t agree more on all points, especially the last sentence.
February 10, 2020 @ 7:11 pm
Hope I can find this song on vinyl or cd, so I can burn it. Isbell is full of shit.
February 11, 2020 @ 11:24 am
lol. that’ll show ’em!
February 10, 2020 @ 7:24 pm
Trigger,
Isn’t it a bit hypocritical to write a review where you call out an artist for being political and at the same time you inject your own political beliefs/opinions into the review?
I’m talking specifically to the paragraph that starts with “The fear of speaking out these days is not being shouldered by the left. It’s being sowed by them.” That whole paragraph calls out one side of the aisle while ignoring the same thing on the other. There are artist that get political on both sides of the aisle.
I give you credit for calling out both sides in reviews, as I’ve read several of your reviews of artist getting political on both sides and you have called both of them out. However, it seems hypocritical to me to call someone out for something and then immediately do it yourself. Just my two cents…
Anyways, love the site and appreciate all that you do. You’ve introduced me to a lot of new artists over the years, so thank you.
February 10, 2020 @ 7:43 pm
Hey man, just to be clear…do you think artists should avoid saying “Every human should be treated with respect, unless they hurt other humans”?
Or do you object to the statement “Children shouldn’t die because they have bad parents”?
If you don’t object to either of those statements…do you believe their worth fighting for?
Based on this article, it seems like you feel that an artist who thinks “Children shouldn’t die in cages because of their parents’ actions,” shouldn’t be censured for refusing to use their talents to object to children dying in cages because of their parents’ actions.
Does that align with your “non-political” beliefs?
February 11, 2020 @ 12:28 pm
If illegal immigrants didn’t break the sovereignty of our border, they wouldn’t be locked up. Common sense.
And illegal immigrants every year hurt American citizens that would have escaped unscathed if the government protected its borders. Kate Steinle is the poster lady.
Darn that personal responsibility. It ruins all of the Left’s whining and “logic.”
February 11, 2020 @ 4:42 pm
So to be clear:
You DO think that toddlers should be locked in cages because of their parents’ actions?
That’s certainly a take, big guy.
What “personal responsibility” do you think a child holds before they’re capable of speaking, much less “understanding the sovereignty of a border”?
Call me crazy, but I think we have a moral obligation to protect the least of Christ’s brothers.
Do you disagree?
February 11, 2020 @ 4:47 pm
Okay guys, let’s not get too off topic here. Thanks!
February 11, 2020 @ 5:28 pm
Yeah, sorry that the statements “It’s important to treat other humans with respect” and “We have a moral obligation to protect sick and starving children” set off that amusingly unhinged response.
February 11, 2020 @ 7:13 pm
Never said that. Try again.
I was clearly talking about the adult ones, but if the children come across, they should be detained until they are sent back.
Christ’s brothers? The favorite liberal tactic of using Christ’s teachings as weapons in a debate. I doubt Jesus would be fine with the illegals breaking the law. So take that lame point elsewhere.
When the illegals respect our laws, they can receive due respect.
February 12, 2020 @ 5:12 pm
Yeah, that lay preacher from Nazareth was notorious for being a law-and-order type!
Hell, he’d probably be the first person to stone someone accused of adultery!
Not to mention the bloody vengeance he would wreak upon his enemies! If someone hit Jesus, he’d hit them back twice as hard!
Seriously, though…have you ever taken the time to sit down and read the gospels?
Like, it’s obviously unfair for me to expect you to have taken several theology classes at the college level, like I have, but “Our moral duty to treat people with respect and help the less fortunate transcends any mortal laws” is, quite literally, the foundational principle of Christianity.
If people are calling your political arguments out for violating fundamental tenets of Christianity, they might not be just using “A favorite liberal tactic.”
They might just have read Matthew (my favorite gospel – and not just because one of my essays about it in undergrad got published).
February 12, 2020 @ 5:23 pm
(Sorry for getting off topic, Trigger – I tend to geek out on the implication of Christ’s teachings on moral philosophy!
This might be even bolder than my “Children dying is bad” take, but I do think that fellow from Nazareth had quite a few good ideas about how humans should treat each other.)
February 12, 2020 @ 6:06 pm
Adultery fell under religious law and that case didn’t relate here.
You do know that your party has repeatedly said that religion doesn’t belong in the political sphere but now you are trying to shame conservative Christians for not following what you consider Christ’s teachings. You are committing blasphemy by your maneuvers. It is amazing how liberals pick and choose to mention Jesus. They treat Him like a political tool.
You took theology classes? Are you special? Guess what, I have taken theology classes and read the Bible as well. Your education isn’t that special.
You were published? Well, WaPo will publish anything. Prove it. Post the link to your essay. Otherwise, quit blowing hot air. Seriously, your attempts at posturing is embarrassing.
February 13, 2020 @ 11:27 am
So, to be clear…is “my party” Thomas Jefferson? Because that’s who wrote “I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should “make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,” thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.”
I mean, I’ll take it – TJeff is pretty firmly my favorite Founding Father, despite his personal flaws.
I’m not going to dox myself with a piece of writing from my undergrad…but is telling that you only ever go for personal attacks, rather than even attempting to rebut my points on their merits.
Which is, of course, why I mentioned Theology. It’s not particularly special in any way, shape, or form to have taken Theology classes…you just don’t seem equipped to actually discuss scripture in a rigorous, or intellectually honest, fashion, the way people who have taken those classes tend to be.
February 12, 2020 @ 1:27 am
Ok Lester…so to be clear, what do you think should be done with children of detained undocumented immigrants?
February 12, 2020 @ 10:17 am
First off, people who are exercising their legal right to claim asylum under both US and international law shouldn’t be imprisoned in the first place. Their claims should instead be taken on good faith, with detainment only used in the event of a subsequent offense, after entering the country.
Second, children whose parents *are* legitimately detained should be remanded to state custody, and ideally placed in foster care until their parents’ cases are resolved.
Can we all agree, at the very least, that the children should receive adequate food, shelter, and medical care?
(Even if it upsets yer man ranting about how toddlers should take “personal responsibility” for their parents’ choice to cross the border?)
February 10, 2020 @ 8:42 pm
Article was completely on point. Even if this song isn’t meant to be overtly political, which it kinda is, it is by far the worst song isbell has ever released. This song is shit. It sounds like he is trying to emulate sturgills style of saying fuck off to his fans, while making a sorry excuse for a woke pop song. I don’t care about politics and nobody is being attacked. People just always make something out of nothing. Nothing will ever be perfect, people are gonna get shit on; you, me, and anyone who doesn’t reach the level of wealth that isbell has now attained. That boy ain’t never been oppressed and he ain’t never worked a day in his life. Maybe he grew up a little on the poor side, but now he is just another turncoat. Jason, you ain’t Bruce Springsteen, so stop trying to be. You lost your own voice and if you keep repeating someone else’s thoughts then you’re just a cheap imitation, an echo. Genuine songwriting is dead, f## this I give up. There is nothing left anymore.
February 10, 2020 @ 8:52 pm
I’ve listened to the song twice and the truth is, the production is awful.Its like he has doubled down on that lousy sounding “Live from the Ryman” record.
February 10, 2020 @ 9:53 pm
I’ll pass. I personally choose to use music as an escape. I’m also an adult who can form my own opinions; with that I don’t use Facebook, Twitter (or other user driven hives of ignorance) and certainly not celebrities. Artists can perform what they want. Everyone has political opinions and that’s fine. However I do not wish to be held hostage (on my dime) by a CD or during a performance.
February 11, 2020 @ 1:53 am
your impassioned review is among your best ever , trigger .
I’m apolitical . I’m musical
i ‘m not a fan of Isbell’s voice…never really have been . serviceable at best IMO .
that said , I had no idea what he was even singing here…… it as so buried in the mix.
and I didn’t like the mix or the arrangement . generic , stiff , no dynamics , too raw , too loud . springsteen has always done this way better .
February 11, 2020 @ 4:32 am
If anyone wants to read a really good book about the actual polarizing climate in american society i strongly suggest “white” by Bret Easton Ellis. I found it brilliant and he also comes out as a Jamey Johnson’s fan!
February 11, 2020 @ 5:16 am
I love Jason’s Southeastern lp, played it in my car for 6 months non stop. I’ve seen him nine times in concert. Although I love and appreciate his talent, I won’t support him by going to his concerts and will cherrypick his songs for purchase. I don’t agree with his political views but wish him well.
February 11, 2020 @ 5:20 am
I just wish we could stop spending inordinate amounts of time on trivial matters like who the president is and spend it fixing things that matter–healthcare, the financial sector, deficit spending, criminal justice abuses, etc. Give us a level playing field with opportunities for all with the least amount of government possible, instead of the 24/7 media circus that keeps us distracted from the real issues–while the backroom deal-making continues, to the benefit of the few at the expense of the many.
February 11, 2020 @ 6:45 am
Sadly I missed this one so here I am at the bottom of the comment section but:
If Jason Isbell expressing political opinions makes you not want to be an Isbell fan I don’t get how you ever were one because he has been writing political songs his whole career. Every Isbell record including the drive by truckers ones he debuted on have left wing political songs.
Also I like to imagine trigger publishing this article in a Nashville newspaper or something after Johnny cash came out with Man In Black.
But my biggest issue is, politics are part of real life. If what you want from country music is authentic artistic statements about real life that is gonna come with a hell of a lot of politics. You know where there’s no politics? In songs about backroads and tan legged juliets.
If you want songs about working class Americans just trying to survive that’s gonna include stuff about the opioid crisis (politics!), loss of manufacturing jobs (politics!), racism (politics!), and everything else that is part of the real lives of real people. Fact is authentic music will always have connections to politics.
February 11, 2020 @ 8:23 am
“If Jason Isbell expressing political opinions makes you not want to be an Isbell fan I don’t get how you ever were one because he has been writing political songs his whole career. Every Isbell record including the drive by truckers ones he debuted on have left wing political songs.”
Again, the problem here is not that “Be Afraid” is a political song. It’s that it’s a song that includes the message that if you are not making political songs right now, your music is worthless, and basically, you’re complicit with the ills of the world as Jason Isbell sees them. This is the distinction.
February 11, 2020 @ 8:40 am
I guess. I see the logic of that personally. But hey I am not really changing the world either. Just a guy posting on a country music website at work instead of working.
February 11, 2020 @ 6:45 am
I’m not a Trump fan- I despise Isbell- Trigger has a cool website.
February 11, 2020 @ 7:28 am
As Trigger suggested, one can choose not to listen. I, for one, choose not to listen. Matter of fact, I do not listen to any of his dribble.
February 11, 2020 @ 7:29 am
This is really bad review or a middling rock tune, dude. Just poorly written and filled with a bunch of nonsense jargon about wokeness that makes a ton of assumptions about Jason’s intent here. It’s like you watched one episode of Bill Maher and are now some sort of expert on politics and PC culture. Sorry you clearly don’t like Isbell’s politics, but damn man, learn how to write with clarity and more succinctness. At the very least, Isbell’s song is clear thematically. Your writing is all over the place here and honestly has the faux intellectual quality of a mediocre writer at best.
February 11, 2020 @ 7:56 am
I think there are a lot of southerners, myself included, who love their geography and people and hate their history and are freaked out that the current politics is going backward to all that darkness instead of forward. They take it personally. To me that’s what you’re hearing in this and in the recent couple of Truckers records. So while I’m not generally a fan of rock and roll mixing with politics this stuff rings true to me.
February 11, 2020 @ 10:34 am
I understand your point, and though your intentions are good, I’d argue (as a lifelong Democrat), that it’s the left that is taking us back to darkness, in many ways.. In the past decade, the left has for a large part replaced liberal ideals such as equality and equal opportunity with quotas (forced equity) and identity politics…and in doing so made us more divided. At the same time, the right has become increasing more tolerant, defensive of our bill of rights, and for treating people as individuals. All of this despite what sensationalist, self-interest fulfilling organizations like the SPLC (literally get paid to)say. Of course the right is not fully there yet , and there are still plenty of things to criticize it for, but this idea of the left being the light and the right being darkness is getting interesting, if like me, you have classical liberal values. I think we should try to avoid such polarizing and binary characterizations.
February 11, 2020 @ 8:32 am
You wait years for new music from Jason Isbell, and you get…this.
I am certain the new record will be more good than bad, just like The Nashville Sound. This particular track was just disappointing.
I have never found Trigger to be a Trumper or far right, quite the contrary, so anyone alleging that just looks silly, IMO. But perhaps I see a bit of myself in Trigger and connect with the sentiment. I would venture to say that most of us are a bit more nuanced that left vs right or good vs evil and prefer music that speaks to the universal human condition.
February 11, 2020 @ 8:53 am
“Furthermore, the notions that “Be Afraid” assert that if you speak out against the current administration or social repression, then you risk retribution is just incorrect.”
I think Lt. Col Vindman, his brother and Ambassador Sondland would beg to differ
February 11, 2020 @ 8:57 am
This line was specifically about music artists, and I provided numerous examples to back up that assertion. Also, Vindman, Sondland, and others that have stood up to the Administration have been mostly touted as heroes in the media, and by the public.
February 11, 2020 @ 11:33 am
Although I read through a number of comments right here promising retribution and seeking such requital as burning Isbell records.
February 11, 2020 @ 12:18 pm
We can’t let the extremes of any side or subject define it. Not every Trump supporter is a Nazi, just like not every Bernie supporter is a Communist.
February 11, 2020 @ 4:04 pm
Trigger, that’s a good point that’s obviously true but I’m having to restrain myself from making a snarky “good people on both sides” comment …
February 12, 2020 @ 1:56 pm
And no, the line and the song is NOT specifically about artists and musicians. It’s a call on anyone who has a voice to use it for good and not sit idly by and do and say nothing.
February 11, 2020 @ 10:55 am
So I guess Cody Jinks’ and Tyler Childers’ latest albums add up to nothing.
February 12, 2020 @ 1:29 am
Yep… Mike and the Moonpies too.
February 12, 2020 @ 6:53 am
This is the kind of read that makes Trigger’s review so frustrating to me. Do you really think Childers, Jinks, or Mike Harmeier are feeling attacked or offended by Be Afraid? It seems obvious that they surely aren’t, and the idea that this song somehow decries their latest albums as adding up to nothing is something dreamed up by Trigger in a fit of aggrievement. Childer’s himself said enough of the “red solo cup and pickup truck” country song, and this sentiment isn’t that much different. Make your music about something, or you’re wasting your shot. The idea that the something that has to be perfectly aligned with Isbell’s politics, or political period, is a hot take driven by reviewers, not the song itself. You’re being manipulated here to get into a shit fight about politics, instead of actually listening to music.
February 11, 2020 @ 11:22 am
it feels like this was a blog post waiting for a song than an actual reaction to the song.
February 11, 2020 @ 11:51 am
The song sounds darker with more subtlety in the mix, streaming through my Amazon platform than Youtube, as linked in the review. Youtube changes the eq, compression and tops out at 128kbps– slower depending on the internet connection.
Most notably the drums aren’t as upfront and the atmospheric guitar with tremolo blends with the rest of the mix much better. With those changes, you can hear a lot more nuance in Isbell’s vocals, adding a level of vulnerability to the song that captures the theme and makes it feel more personal. Excited to hear the rest of the album.
February 11, 2020 @ 12:14 pm
Wow, good tune. The song doesn’t seem to match the writers hyper interpretation of its meaning but you’re free to hear w
February 11, 2020 @ 12:53 pm
Everybody wants to be their version of Jesus with a message. Sometimes they deserve to be crucified for it. His choice to portray himself as another liberal Jesus (in my view, more like a special needs Satan that thinks he is not evil) with a message.
I do not mind when someone wish’s to express a differing opinion, but so often it is done with the stench of piousness. Pure hypocritical virtue loving testicle cancer.
It’s like your friendly neighbour Catholic preacher labelling the sin and the sinners, whilst he bangs your wife on weekends…full of hypocritical BS.
February 11, 2020 @ 1:11 pm
Isbell sucks. Was disappointed to see Billy Stings touring with that dipshit
February 12, 2020 @ 5:40 am
Why does it matter who Billy Strings toured with? You’re doing the same shit Isbell is doing by shaming people for not taking a political stance (you’re shaming by affiliation). Billy Strings could be the house band for The View and if you like his music, it shouldn’t tarnish how you feel about him!
February 12, 2020 @ 8:21 am
I wasn’t shaming Billy. I just wouldn’t want to waste have the money for a ticket that isbell is on to go see Billy Strings. I would always go see Billy Strings but I’d leave after he was done.
February 12, 2020 @ 8:59 am
Ok. My apologies. I get that.
February 11, 2020 @ 2:20 pm
Jason should be a man of his word and issue an apology to all musicians the world over!! I’m sure he will continue to fling insults to those who dare have a different point of view.
February 11, 2020 @ 2:38 pm
Lame review. God bless Jason Isbell.
February 11, 2020 @ 3:57 pm
With output as terrible as this (song and production wise), he is in need of all our hopes and prayers.
February 11, 2020 @ 4:18 pm
If he wants to be political then let him be. He is a brilliant artist with more guts then any ass kissing fake patriot. I’m so disappointed to see Trigger say how great things are when the truth is they are only great for the people at the top. When the planet will no longer sustain life because of the science denying mob boss none of this will matter.Our joke of a president is nothing more than a puppet of the most evil powerful man in the world Vladimir Putin
February 11, 2020 @ 4:50 pm
I didn’t say “how great things are.” What I said was,
“That’s not to say there still isn’t incredible work to be done towards true equality, or that some people still live in communities that present severe challenges. But this idea that life in the United States is so severe, everyone must speak up and take action is simply a symptom of the proliferation of social media into our daily lives, and the polarization the electorate due to the political and media industrial complex gaming the American mind.”
Statistically, things have never been better in the United States. This is just the truth. The fact that so many people are harping on how terrible the United States is a symptom of widespread privilege.
February 11, 2020 @ 5:35 pm
I like that you reply to everyone respectively, but you are dealing with individuals who preach equality, yet ignore the votes/opinions of those they consider to be beneath them. So much for my vote counts as much as yours.
A relatively poorer (most western poverty is relative, not absolute) individual could state they feel better off today than 5 years ago and all of sudden that opinion means nothing to some, because they switched over to the dark side. It takes away the reason why too many privileged people (not that they ever give away their privilege) loath their country, a sense of current and historic injustice that can only be corrected by their generous good graces in ripping up the past and giving these less well off people….. other less well off but slightly more well off peoples money.
If you disagree, you are no longer disagreeing with their ideas, you are actually disagreeing with them as an entity, a human being, hence the vicious reactions denouncing naysayers to social utopia.
February 11, 2020 @ 5:40 pm
Statistically, purchasing power isn’t nearly as high as it was 40 years ago.
That is, of course, part of why Trump was elected…but things have actually gotten worse over his term.
Anyway, the panic has more to do with the rollback of protections for minority groups, children, and the poor during yer man’s tenure…along with the myriad Constitutional Crises his actions have inflicted on our democracy.
February 11, 2020 @ 6:14 pm
Where I am, I am a minority and both my parents are foreign. Thankfully both my parents never raised me in a closed community and I do not view myself as a victim.
My mother has suffered racism, but again, she is not a victim either. She is better off than the idiot that verbally abused her.
I just need the laws that apply to people who were here before me, to apply to me and that I respect the laws of the country I am in. That is all that needs to be enforced. I do want any special extras thank you.
Purchasing power and globalism is linked. Most people who think they are concerned end up attacking capitalism whilst defending corporatism. I find that funny.
Protection of Children? like what? Child separation at the border? unfortunately not everyone is like me and you (I assume). Selling/buying and kidnapping of children in Central and Southern America does unfortunately happen, so that someone can claim to be with a child when they cross the border.
Mass graves of people as victims of people traffickers? Open borders will recreate the medieval era of empires and slavery.
Just because there are people who support policies you believe to be horrible, does not make the policy worse than what was before for the.
I am sure you may have meant more/other things, but if Trump improves his vote % with minorities this year, will you call them stupid or reflect that maybe what you believe is not completely true to the people you claim need protecting?
February 11, 2020 @ 7:06 pm
Good thing, America is a republic and not a democracy like you mistakenly claimed.
Simple stuff, really,
February 12, 2020 @ 10:35 am
Representative Democracy is also an accurate description.
February 12, 2020 @ 6:10 pm
He said democracy not Representative Democracy. Try again, white knight.
February 13, 2020 @ 10:04 am
Sure, I’ll try to explain it to you again. A representative democracy is a type of democracy. And so if someone refers to our form of government as a democracy, they are not wrong. Sure, representative democracy or democratic republic would be a more accurate description. But you when you attempt to correct someone by definitively saying that our form of government is NOT a democracy, you are wrong.
February 11, 2020 @ 6:21 pm
Ah yes, the Putin puppet thing you heard on the news or somewhere.
Every find it odd that Putin’s puppet would:
-Arm the Ukraine with Anti-tank misses. Something Obama didn’t have the guts to do.
-Fire misses at and kill Russians on a base in Syria
-Be a champion of fracking (something that is crashing Russia’s number 1 export.
I didn’t vote for the guy, but TDS is doing nobody any good.
February 11, 2020 @ 6:32 pm
Do not worry SG, Obama’s brilliant move of allowing Russia to take Crimea has meant and increased amount of their budget being spent on “reunification “. They can no longer afford to pay for Putin’s spa days and bear wrestling events.
Strange how a bully’s posturing grows and shrinks depending how weak or strong the opposition is.
February 11, 2020 @ 6:49 pm
What’s funny is that people keep using these tired and disproven talking points that even many on the left know not to be true. That BS will appeal to lefties, but in the process of doubling down on what most free thinking people now see as bullshit…they are only pushing the middle to the right. It’s going to be interesting to see what happens in the swing states come November.
February 13, 2020 @ 9:02 pm
How exactly is it gutsy to take a stance that the rest of the artist community and media readily embraces?
February 11, 2020 @ 4:27 pm
You get the feeling that Trigger would have whistled past a concentration camp and said, “Well, not my place to get involved.” I’ve read his inane and tired and highly ignorant thoughts for so long when it comes to any type of political message in a song. It’d be one thing if the things he said were rooted in any semblance of fact or history or logical or morality. They aren’t rooted in anything… and that’s the hill this guy wants to die on? What an empty, vapid, soulless, immoral view.
February 11, 2020 @ 4:56 pm
Yes, I’m soulless and immoral. Seriously, just think about what you accused another human of being, and one you have never met.
February 11, 2020 @ 6:01 pm
Toddlers are literally dying in cages in your home state, man…and you’re wringing your hands that Isbell is getting too angry about it.
I don’t think you’re a bad person or anything, but this entire article is clearly written from a place of (ugh) privilege, as a member of the only demographic group that doesn’t feel threatened in the current political environment (a group to which I also belong).
And, to be clear, I say this all as someone who regularly gets crap from my friends about not being far enough Left.
February 11, 2020 @ 6:40 pm
You’ve gone from kids to toddlers now. There’s a reason your continual mention of this is not having any effect:
From the AP (not right wing news):
“A year ago, Associated Press photographs showing young people in such enclosures were misrepresented online as depicting child detentions by Trump and denounced by some Democrats and activists as illustrating Trump’s cruelty. In fact, the photos were taken in 2014 during the Obama administration.
Many Democrats continue to exploit the imagery of “babies in cages” — as Harris put it — without acknowledging Obama used the facilities, too. His administration built the McAllen, Texas, center with chain-link holding areas in 2014.
Under Trump, journalists have witnessed migrants crowded into fetid chain-link quarters. The maltreatment of migrants is the responsibility of the Trump administration — and arguably Congress, for not approving more money for better care.”
Not that it makes them any better. But fuck, your TDS is blinding you.
February 12, 2020 @ 10:30 am
…it wasn’t okay when Obama detained children, either.
That said, he wasn’t imprisoning asylum seekers and their families…and the kids weren’t fucking dying in custody, either.
Call it TDS if you like, but more than twice as many kids died at the border last year as any on record, and several of those deaths came in US custody.
I know saying this triggers CountryKnight something awful, but…I’m gonna have to take a firm stance that children dying is bad.
February 12, 2020 @ 10:55 am
🏅 for for taking “a firm stance” and sharing your virtue with us.
February 12, 2020 @ 5:15 pm
Hey man – as an Award Winning Listener of the world’s most Anti-Hitler podcast, I have an obligation to Big Cat and PFT to stake out bold moral positions!
February 12, 2020 @ 1:52 pm
He didn’t accuse you of being soulless and immoral. He said your view was soulless and immoral.
February 12, 2020 @ 5:12 pm
I’d say that’s a distinction without a difference.
February 11, 2020 @ 5:39 pm
I am sure that if the concentration camp was re-branded to a Gulag, you would have approved of anyone whistling past it. Especially if it was full of those bothersome types that usually disapprove of certain viewpoints that you approve off…..
February 11, 2020 @ 5:53 pm
Well, that’s an eloquent way to call someone a communist. Way to go.
February 11, 2020 @ 6:05 pm
lol.
The “Yeah, well, you’re a Commie!!!!” argument is the last refuge of the uninspired mind.
February 11, 2020 @ 6:22 pm
It was in response to someone using the “powerful” yet disrespectfully used concentration camp reference to try and tarnish another. My response was perfectly in line with the path set.
Please redirect your sassyness to yawn (Again).
February 11, 2020 @ 7:10 pm
You don’t even have to mention gulags. He is perfectly fine voting for a party that locked up American citizens during WW2.
Funny how the Left ignores that situation or makes excuses for it.
Nothing wrong with locking up illegals for breaking the law.
February 12, 2020 @ 6:35 am
Yes. And funny how the Left conveniently forgets that The Great Emancipator was a Republican.
#heavysarcasm
February 13, 2020 @ 11:41 am
These are the types of post when I honestly wonder if the kid is doing some sort of elaborate bit.
Like, this goes beyond the verge of self-parody.
February 11, 2020 @ 6:29 pm
Curious …
How would you have balled up to help any 1 of the millions killed in one of the worst genocides in history?
While you’re at it, why don’t you tell how you would get involved to help the children being kidnapped, under warlord Joseph Kony, escape. Or, how you would step up to try and put a stop to the hundreds of thousands being savaged and murdered, under this barbaric -ucker.
Go ahead, will wait until you research Kony.
Might want to give it more than a 5 minute, cursory research. Applicable to the hear & now
February 11, 2020 @ 6:29 pm
Do not worry SG, Obama’s brilliant move of allowing Russia to take Crimea has meant and increased amount of their budget being spent on “reunification “. They can no longer afford to pay for Putin’s spa days and bear wrestling events.
Strange how a bully’s posturing grows and shrinks depending how weak or strong the opposition is.
February 11, 2020 @ 8:01 pm
I think he is angling to become Americana artist of the year. Perfect group for him.