Billboard’s Chart Dates Still Imperfect After New Change, & Don’t Address Need for Daily Metrics
On Tuesday (12-19), Billboard, the worldwide leader in chart publishing, announced they would be changing the posted dates on their weekly charts from one arbitrary day that doesn’t reflect the true nature of the chart, to another arbitrary day that doesn’t reflect the true nature of the chart, but that is slightly closer to the day that the charts are actually published, though still not the actual date the charts are published.
This move is tantamount to rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic in an industry that is going to quickly become irrelevant if it can’t re-organize to meet the realities of today’s music consuming habits, as well as the way that the industry consumes data.
The reason that Billboard has always employed a date for their charts that is way ahead of the date the actual charts are posted is to attempt to present them as relevant, regardless of what day someone may look at them. Nobody wants to look a 4-day-old data, right? But that’s exactly what Billboard’s charts are, at least by Thursday. So Billboard would forward date their charts to the point where you almost thought you were cheating the system by seeing data way ahead of the curve, regardless of when you viewed it.
Currently, the charts online (which come out a day after the printed/subscriber charts) are dated 11 days after the charts are first published on Tuesday, meaning no matter what day you view the charts, the date is way ahead of the day you’re looking at them. Now Billboard will date charts on the Saturday after the Tuesday when they’re actually published, so still four days after the actual published date.
Billboard has been doing a lot to modernize its charts amid the onslaught of streaming data that has now become the dominant metric in music. Fans of physical media can shake their fists all they want at the changing paradigm, but streaming is here, and should be weighted to reflect what is resonating with listeners.
However the weekly standard for charts is quickly being left behind in the fast-paced and data-driven world of music. If Billboard wants to stay relevant in the chart publishing forum, it shouldn’t just lie a little bit less about their publishing dates (an old ruse in weekly publishing used by many periodicals in the past), it should adopt a daily metric, accessible by all, that gives consumers and industry a 24-hour glimpse into the trends affecting the industry in real time.
In fact, this is already being done in many sectors of music. Apple’s iTunes charts are often cited by fans and industry alike when artists perform well on them, and are updated hourly, as are Amazon’s charts. HITS Daily Double is leading the way in publishing building charts that reflect sales and streams on a more daily basis compared to Billboard. And stream counts on Spotify and other places, as well as the data delivered to artists and their representatives through Spotify’s dashboards, are giving music professionals the tools they need to succeed in a competitive music market. CDX and other technology companies are also doing bold things in real time with radio charting, and access to that data. Billboard even has daily charts when it comes to monitoring social media in music.
All the information is already there in the pipeline, being aggregated in real time. Very little infrastructure would need to be built to make this a reality. And Billboard, as the leader in this space—and the one responsible for compiling all the various data streams into one universally-accepted chart—should be leading the charge. In fact as soon as daily charts are adopted, it will probably soon be time to make hourly charts, and real time charts available, at least when it comes to consumer activity online.
It’s understandable in some respects why Billboard would not want to boldly enter the space of daily, or real time charts. Ultimately, they are a weekly periodical, and rely on selling advertising to accompany their charts as a source of revenue. Billboard puts incredible effort out to make sure their charts are balanced, and equitable, and they have to aggregate data from many different outlets, not just one like iTunes, and then balance it all out. It is not an enviable position, especially with so many different sources supplying data these days.
But even if daily and real time charts are adopted throughout the industry and by Billboard, the weekly chart will still be the gold standard, much more immune to hyper trends that may roil daily charts after a certain artist releases a new song, or a current event spikes listens for a certain artist.
There are already so many places updating daily, and hourly to reflect consumer sentiment in music. The question is if Billboard is going to participate in this shift in the paradigm, or be left behind, still feeling that forward dating their charts is the way to fool today’s savvy consumers into thinking they’re looking at something that is still relevant.
December 19, 2017 @ 3:43 pm
Thanks for trying to make this at least understandable. I know most people on here don’t read Billboard or look at charts at all per se but I’ve always been a chart chode since working at WEA (Warner Elektra Atlantic) in 1978. I get Billboard for free from my library app Zineo and it and the charts are always a few days to a week behind the website chart which used to come out on Thursday dated the following week, right? Like the current Country Album Chart is dated 12/30/17 and today’s the 19th. Latest Billboard is dated 12/23. No wonder people get confused. Throw in that we now have 4 Country singles charts etc and it’s like wtf? Thanks for turning us on to Country Aircheck too. It’s a free PDF download which I now read every week even though I (or anyone else on here) rarely listen to the radio. It’s a business and it’s still fun to see the “going for ads” , number of spins etc……The music business has been a game measured by all of this long before all of us were alive. Hopefully the internet and this site will help change at least some of it. It’s cool you have your own charts as well.
December 20, 2017 @ 2:58 am
I’m still kinda pissed at Billboard for being so behind the curve in the late 90s with the Hot 100 and not allowing album cuts getting tons of radio play to chart until December 1998. That meant huge radio hits like No Doubt’s “Don’t Speak” and Green Day’s “When I Come Around” never charted on the Hot 100 back then.
I know it was a screwed up landscape between 1995-2004 with huge radio songs not being released as retail singles, and then illegal MP3s being downloaded with no legal way to buy them until iTunes came along, but even after iTunes came along Billboard didn’t incorporate download sales into the Hot 100 until 2005.
December 20, 2017 @ 4:19 pm
Richard Laviolette. Best country album 2017.