Taylor Swift Announced As New Face of $10 Bill After Solving Mother of All 1st World Problems
After solving the mother of all First World problems, the United States Treasury has announced that pop superstar Taylor Swift will be the new face of the $10 bill. And word out of Oslo, Norway is that Swift has all of a sudden been shifted right into the running for the next Nobel Peace Prize. What cataclysmic upheaval did Taylor Swift stave off to be bestowed such distinctions? . . . The contentious and complex issue of whether music artists would be paid during a preliminary, 3-month trial period as part of Apple Music’s new streaming service.
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew made the announcement late last week that gender equality was coming to America’s paper money stocks in the form of a facelift for the 10-spot, and ever since then names like Susan B. Anthony, Harriet Tubman, Rosa Parks, Sacagawea, Sally Ride, and Elanor Roosevelt have been offered up as viable candidates for the currency upgrade. But Taylor Swift’s Father’s Day heroics to stave off an impasse between Apple and many independent artists by posting an open letter about the issue has the United States mint thinking “Swifties” are a good replacement for the old “Hamilton’s.”
“If there’s anything we’ve learned over over the 240 years of the American democracy is that there isn’t a problem we can’t make for ourselves out of an issue that ultimately is of nominal consequence, and then solve that problem after great histrionics and hand wringing,” said Treasury spokesperson Dylan Frankenfurter, as part of the Treasury announcement. “It’s the perfect way to pat ourselves on the back and make heroes out of average individuals for doing virtually inconsequential deeds in lieu of solving legitimate problems, or enacting actual progress.”
John Markman of the technology-based Quagmire Magazine—a self-professed streaming music expert—says, “While a 1/3 of the world just struggles to find basic necessities like clean water, food, and shelter, we take an elective entertainment commodity made in an elective profession, and make it seem like a matter of life and death. Taylor Swift’s greatest accomplishment might have been getting Apple’s top tier elitist executives to break their Bay Area Father’s Day golfing tee times when she blew up their 12th-generation prototype Smartphones with her Tumblr post. Meanwhile civil war and smoldering conflicts ravage the rest of the world more than ever in recent memory, and divisiveness across racial, economic, and ideological divides has reached the peak of polarization on the home front. We should all be thankful that the free flow of Taylor Swift’s derivative and mediocre pop music, mostly composed on a Mac by Swedish producer Shellback, will not be infringed, helping us all dull the pain of raging complacency.”
But even if the Taylor Swift / Apple Music impasse had not been solved, some say life and music in the United States would have inexplicably gone on. “Music is one of the most basic forms of express by man, and no matter what corporations or superstars try to do with it, it belongs to the people—to the people who express it and enjoy it,” says Johnny Harrison from Oswego, who describes himself as an average music fan. “The most important thing is passing along the idea that music has value. But even if all the music in the world became free, they could never take away the joy that exists on back porches, in living rooms, in thousands of bars and clubs all across the fruited plane filled with musicians purely expressing themselves and the fans that love them. Good on Taylor Swift for taking a stand, but ultimately it is the people that have to vote with their dollars to keep real music alive.”
Meanwhile a grassroots campaign to draft Taylor Swift for the upcoming Presidential election is underway, as is an effort to amend the Constitution so a 25-year-old can run for the office. But Swift is said to not be interested in the pursuit, unless she can retrofit her current “1989 World Tour” into a politically-oriented whistle stop campaign on the fly.
Rosa Parks could not be reached for comment.
June 22, 2015 @ 10:28 am
Absolutely nailed it, Trigger!
June 22, 2015 @ 10:29 am
Ha ha. Okay, I get it. But what she did helped independent artists A LOT. And it’s very easy for the wealthy to not give a shit and lend a voice. I believe her when she says she doesn’t need to speak out on her own behalf, because she makes serious bank. If an artist were to put out a release independently and be able to sell 5K units on iTunes over the next few months when Apple was not planning on not paying royalties on streaming, and half of the iTunes customers made the logical choice not to pay for the download, but to stream for free, that leaves an artist poorer by a gross amount of $17,500. That’s a lot of mortgage payments, burritos, gas for the van, etc. You may call that a first world problem, but for the working class artist who was planning a release anytime soon, it was in fact going to be a problem. And it’s a problem Taylor Swift had a HUGE part in solving.
In honor of her contribution, I think we should declare a three month free trial period where we don’t talk shit about Taylor Swift. She just saved the artist community millions and millions of dollars.
June 22, 2015 @ 11:34 am
Normally I allow the new car smell wear off these things before commenting so in depth, but I also don’t want to be misunderstood what this commentary is about, which is common with sarcasm.
I did my part raining plaudits on Taylor Swift yesterday for standing up to Apple (READ HERE: https://www.savingcountrymusic.com/taylor-swift-stands-up-to-apples-streaming-service-in-open-letter) and this was not just a formality. I truly do applaud her leadership, have praised her leadership on this issue and others for years, and frankly, am a little jealous that she left country, regardless of her music, because leadership is just what country music needs at the moment. I think there’s still details to hash out about how all of this went down (was Apple going to pay through the 3-month period anyway? etc. etc.), and though I stop short of the rampant conspiracy theories being hatched about how this was all a marketing scheme, I think there’s still some information that needs to come out before we know just what a feat Taylor accomplished, and how important it was.
I very well could be the biggest Taylor Swift apologist in history, if for no other reason than because I started as one of her staunchest critics. And though I have my own critics, I think it is pretty obvious that I’ve poured much ink in the support of music over the years, and specifically in dissertations about maintaining the value of music.
See Examples: Free Music Now Seen as an Inalienable Right by Consumers
https://www.savingcountrymusic.com/free-music-is-now-seen-as-an-inalienable-right-by-consumers-industry
Why NPR Should Offer a Streaming Music Service
https://www.savingcountrymusic.com/why-npr-should-offer-a-streaming-music-service-charge-too-much-for-it
But last night and this morning when I watched the plaudits roll in for Taylor Swift’s leadership, a little bit of sickness crept in my stomach when I read the headlines it was supplanting. This isn’t Taylor Swift’s fault. She tried and succeeded in doing a good thing. But to us music nerds, this is about artists getting paid, while to the wide masses this is making sure Taylor Swift’s “1989” can be streamed on their phones without much effort. I don’t want to play the bleeding heart humanist, but there was something that really bothered me about this, and I thought some perspective needed to be given to the issue. Yes, I’m happy as a music fan (though I have no intention of using Apple’s service), but we are all humans first. Taylor Swift and Apple solved a problem in 12 hours. Why can’t we use this type of pragmatism and effort to tackle the real issues of today? Music will always survive as long as there’s people who are willing to fight for it, and unfortunately some folks are probably not going to make it to the paragraph where I attempted to illustrate that. But in the end, music is still secondary to survival, and to freedom, and for so many, whether Taylor Swift’s 1989 is on their Smartphone or not is such a trivial matter, it’s sort of insulting to even broach it.
June 22, 2015 @ 12:21 pm
Show me the person who can end a civil war, starvation, vast economic inequality, slavery, etc with an “open letter”, and I’ll show you someone who should be leading the world.
The reason those major problems aren’t solved in 12 hours is because they are MAJOR problems. This thing DOES seem trivial to me… but that may because I’m not looking at the long-tail of it, as I’m sure Swift and Co are. The fact is, if music is where you make your living, you don’t want people giving it away for free. Yes, the world has shifted into some weird model where we don’t value music monetarily as we once did. The quote, “But even if all the music in the world became free, they could never take away the joy that exists on back porches, in living rooms, in thousands of bars and clubs all across the fruited plane filled with musicians purely expressing themselves” sickens me. That’s like saying, if the NFL suddenly had to give its fans free tickets, even though the players would no longer be able to support their families, that’s ok. People could still go toss the football in their own yard. It’s ridiculous.
I’m all for altruism, and yes, there are much larger problems in the world than locking in pay for streaming over a 3-month period … but when analyses are made of economic trends, there is generally a single moment, a tipping point, at which the trend takes off. Without this intervention, this could very well have been the tipping point that de-capitalized recorded music. It’s hard to know, but I’m glad that either way, it has been avoided (for now).
I guess at the end of the day, you could say “why should we report THIS” about just about any news article that ISN’T a war story, hunger story, etc… because those problems continue to exist, and nothing else is worth talking about until they don’t.
But if that was true, your blog would be called “Saving Humanity” and we wouldn’t read nearly as much about Luke Bryan falling off stages.
June 22, 2015 @ 6:06 pm
Luke Bryan falling off the stage, that’s funny as hell. Engaging in an unprovoked war with Taylor Swift, Is both childish and mean. True readers of this site doesn’t give a rat’s butt about TS. The girl did a good thing. Can it be proven that this was sImply a publicity stunt? The answer is No. The truth of the matter is, this is not the Civil War. This is just music.Yes I do believe Taylor Swift have the power to Influence Apple overnight. End of story. Now, let’s pretend we are a third grade teacher and give Taylor Swift her welldeserved little star.
June 23, 2015 @ 9:26 am
Dukes,
Somehow there is a very strange disconnect going on with some people and this article. I can understand folks you have never been to Saving Country Music before maybe misunderstanding what is going on here, but the idea that some are questioning whether I put any monetary value to music is quite shocking to me frankly. The guy you quoted above does not exist. It’s a fake quote, and it certainly doesn’t represent the perspective of Saving Country Music. At the same time, it does represent a common perspective, and in the end, is true. People will still cherish music no matter what happens.
All that said, I do think the heroism assigned to Taylor Swift for her open letter did not fit the deed. Was it important, did she do a good thing? Yes. But where yesterday everyone was showering Swift with praise, today it is all about dialing that praise back in the light of new facts (as I said it would be). I still am not buying into all the conspiracy theories, I do think the open letter was a success and should be praised. But this will NOT solve the streaming paradigm for artists. This is a minor victory in a much larger war.
June 22, 2015 @ 11:55 pm
Great. One more anti-musician asshole blogging his expert opinion on what is and ain’t important in the world, trivializing what we do like its just kicking a fucking can around for fun. This place has really gone to shit the last few weeks. I’ve tried to hang on, but I’m out.
June 23, 2015 @ 7:40 am
SJ, are YOU a musician? Taylor Swift made an official announcement that she does not want to be considered a country singer, but strictly a pop singer. She should now be off limits. I could care less what was going on with her before and I care even less right now. The only reason why I read this story was because of the headline. I normally do not read anything pertaining to Taylor Swift. She does not interest me!!! What is of interest to me is the abusive nature of both of these articles. I am going to guess that the reason why this girl left country music is because she was tired of being a punching bag. The grade for this story is a big fat F.
June 23, 2015 @ 7:53 am
Sam,
Look, I apologize if something I did here offended you, and I value your readership, just as I value everyone’s readership, especially the folks you like to regularly chime in through the comments section. But Saving Country Music is not necessarily set up for the daily reader. I have a lot of daily readers and I deeply appreciate their loyalty. But if you’re going to be a daily reader, you’re going to have to understand that at some point I am going to say something that offends you. That’s not because I look to offend people, it’s because I built this site around being brutally honest about my opinions as opposed to pandering to a constituency.
But look, this is a FAKE news story. It’s total bullshit, meant to get a cheap laugh off of and move on. It’s complete and utter stupidity. Taylor Swift is not going to be on the $10 bill. There is no Dylan Frankenfurter who works for the Treasury. Of are the articles you or anyone else would cite as why you don’t read anyone, this would probably be the one you would NOT want to assign that distinction to since sarcasm can be so easily misunderstood and interpreted so differently by different individuals.
As for this ridiculous notion that I don’t think music or the people that make it have any value, I thought maybe the last eight years of pouring my entire fucking life into this website and writing thousands upon thousands of articles in support of music, including many specific articles not just supporting the value of music, but fighting for it, and trying to find pragmatic solutions to the new streaming dilemma would at least be taken into consideration before someone asserted that I think music has no value. If music has no value, Saving Country Music doesn’t even exist to be able to write a stupid article such as this.
Again, I apologize if something I said you happened to find offensive. But of all the articles I’ve written, this would be the one to write off.
June 23, 2015 @ 9:25 am
There is no need to apologize.
Perhaps other people should apologize for failing English comprehension in grammar school.
June 23, 2015 @ 8:11 am
Please tell you were drunk when you wrote that comment.
June 23, 2015 @ 9:39 am
He makes a half way gesture at an apology and then get you to say “please tell me you were drunk when you wrote this.” Whatever! Trigger, how could you not imagine that you have people who read your website every day? I have never read anything you wrote on Taylor Swift in its entirety because, I have never been interested in her enough to dislike her. Taylor Swift is off limits. You must respect that
June 23, 2015 @ 10:06 am
” Trigger, how could you not imagine that you have people who read your website every day?”
I never said that. I know there’s lots of daily readers, and I value every one of them, including you. But you have to come to this site understanding at some point I’m probably going to say something that pisses you off. In this case, the only way that could happen is through misunderstanding. It’s a fake article. And by the way, this is the reason I don’t sell T-shirts or try to beg people for subscription money. Because eventually everyone is going to probably feel slighted by me at some point. I’m not trying to anger people, I’m just being as brutally honest as I can be. But in this case, if you’re going to assert that I don’t care about artists getting paid, or even that I’m attacking Taylor Swift in some way, you are so completely off the scent, it’s something you need to delve deeper to understand as opposed to assigning philosophies to me that don’t exist.
June 23, 2015 @ 9:46 am
He “got me” to write this? Kiss my ass. I have been a regular reader of this site for five years. I found Sam’s description of Trigger as a “anti-musician asshole” to be one the strangest comments I ever read here. As far as I’m concerned, Trigger owed nobody an apology.
June 23, 2015 @ 11:28 am
Trigger I know you care about music. I am with you, I have never and probably will never download music from Apple. I get it that you are insinuating that Taylor Swift did not .resolve this problem in just a few hours. When it comes to music, the biggest spenders are between the ages of 15 to 25. Most of which are Taylor Swift’s fans. Apple would be a fool not to listen to her. There is nothing deep going on here. As I said, I don’t care about Apple or Taylor. . Taylor has moved out of your jurisdiction. If you’re still going to beat up on her, then it’s obviously personal.
June 23, 2015 @ 2:11 pm
@Sonas: My original “drunk” comment was a reply to Sam, not Trigger. Perhaps you misread that.
June 22, 2015 @ 3:27 pm
I agree with you. Sure, it’s not solving world peace, but far too often artists and other creative professionals are expected to donate their product “to gain exposure” while someone else profits from them. Why shouldn’t they get paid…I’m sure the Apple employees operating the service aren’t waiting three months for their pay checks.
June 23, 2015 @ 8:52 am
Nobody is arguing that Apple offering their service for free for three months and not paying artists was unjust.
June 22, 2015 @ 10:33 am
i’m glad someone is making fun of this
June 22, 2015 @ 10:37 am
my butt is “elated and relieved”
June 22, 2015 @ 10:38 am
beter her then harriat tugman or billary clinton.
June 22, 2015 @ 10:45 am
I don’t know. Sounds more like a personal opinion than satire.
June 22, 2015 @ 11:27 am
‘a self-professed streaming music expert’
God knows we have enough those out there.
June 22, 2015 @ 12:03 pm
“Rosa parks could not be reached for comment” lmao!
June 22, 2015 @ 12:09 pm
I think she should only get it if she successfully duels a hologram of Steve Jobs.
June 22, 2015 @ 12:50 pm
The $10? No way. Alexander Hamilton was the man.
Give her the $20.
June 22, 2015 @ 12:51 pm
Now we need to address the biggest problem facing music today, which is people stealing it. A couple folks on this forum recently mentioned downloading the “leaked” version of the forthcoming Jason Isbell album like it was no big deal. Troubling.
June 22, 2015 @ 1:20 pm
As long as they buy the album next month, I honestly don’t see a problem with it.
If they don’t buy the album, then there’s a problem.
June 22, 2015 @ 1:20 pm
Edit: misplaced reply
June 22, 2015 @ 1:39 pm
” I’m ecstatic about this new development in the Apple compensation issue ” said rhythm guitar player John Smith of the band ” The Unknowns ” upon hearing of Apple’s latest conciliatory move . “The 14 dollars in revenue this will generate means both of the band’s guitar players can restring at least once in the next three months , thanks , of course , to Superhero T.Swift who single-handedly came to the rescue of all bandkind when we needed her most . I love her music now ” added Smith tearfully .
June 23, 2015 @ 4:11 am
Good one!
I think CBS news said Pharrell Williams’ song Happy was streamed 43 million times in one quarter, and he received $2,700 as a result.
June 22, 2015 @ 1:39 pm
This is total fucking bullshit! No way should Taylor Swift be on the $10. There are plenty of accomplished deserving women who have been overlooked and this is a slap in the face to all of them. Just few who are far more deserving: Sarah Palin, Rosie O’Donnell, any of the Kardashians or their step-mom Caitlyn, Joni Ernst, Hannah Montana, etc…
June 22, 2015 @ 2:19 pm
Lmfao dude. Priceless!
June 22, 2015 @ 3:02 pm
And to think if The Marcy Brother’s had the hit with their version of Acky-Break Heart we wouldn’t have heard of Miley Cyrus at all.
June 22, 2015 @ 2:49 pm
Didn’t some magazine recently put on the cover a picture with Taylor Swift and the word “national treasure”. LOL!
Loretta is a national treasure… Taylor is more of a bargain find at Walmart.
June 23, 2015 @ 7:18 pm
Yes! Yes! Yes! Country music today is a far cry from telling the heartfelt stories of traditional country music I grew up with. Taylor Swift is no country singer. Hot girls, trucks, gettin some, partying and tattoos are all country music has come to.
June 22, 2015 @ 4:17 pm
Swift isn’t my cup of tea, but she’s surely talented. At least she wasn’t trying to move the music backwards.
June 22, 2015 @ 4:18 pm
So where do we nominate Aldean & Bryan to co-star on the three dollar bill?
June 22, 2015 @ 4:51 pm
Darn. I wish I was wealthy enough to use $10 dollar bills as toilet paper.
June 22, 2015 @ 7:34 pm
Nice piece!
June 22, 2015 @ 8:59 pm
Good one, Trigger 😉
I wonder how many people would think that these fake news articles are real if the “Frankenfurter” name wasn’t used…
June 23, 2015 @ 4:39 am
I’m not a fan of Taylor Swift, but if our masters are going to put a female on the $10 bill, she’s a better option than all of the absurd names I’ve seen mentioned before. Why not Caitlin Jenner? She is an Olympic hero! First woman to win the Men’s Decathlon. Now, THAT is quite an accomplishment….
June 23, 2015 @ 8:22 am
The website Women on 20s asked users to vote for the woman they would like to see on US currency, and the winners were Eleanor Roosevelt, Harriet Tubman, and Rosa Parks, all of whom would be solid choices (in my mind). I know your remark about Caitlin Jenner is a joke, but I don’t think it is a funny or necessary one. Follow your arrow, live and let live, etc. Her life has to be hard.
June 23, 2015 @ 9:00 am
What better way to honor her “bravery” than to put her on the $10 bill? When your life is hard, and you’re really struggling with a big decision, like whether or not to maim yourself, the best way to deal with it is to whore yourself out to television shows and magazines for a big payday. Do you really believe the bullshit you just wrote?
As for the new bill and whatever group of morons voted on their iPhones to put one of those women on the face of the $10, the only good news is that Alexander Hamilton will be coming off the bill. Hamilton is the patron saint of Wall Street, and frankly I’m shocked that the proposal doesn’t call for removal of Jackson or Jefferson, the evil people that they were. The first woman to appear on American currency was Lucy Pickens on several issues of Confederate money.
You seem like a lot of fun, Duster, we should hang out some time. I hope you don’t mind if I call you Duster.
June 23, 2015 @ 9:23 am
Call me what you like. The point you seemed to be making in your initial post is that Jenner’s claim to be a woman is as ridiculous as Trigger’s satirical suggestion that Taylor Swift become the new face of the $10 bill. I think replacing Jefferson on the $2 bill would be perceived as a slap in the face to women since it doesn’t circulate much.
June 23, 2015 @ 5:07 am
I fucking love you Trigger! Funny shit.
June 23, 2015 @ 8:08 am
I JUST finished listening to today’s episode of “On Point” on NPR (don’t judge), and it was also all about Taylor Swift taking the music industry by the horns. On Twitter, Rosanne Cash, who is a true country legend and my vote for the $10 bill (ha), has been making similar criticisms for months and months about the bad deal that streaming services offer singers and songwriters. I make an effort to buy, either on CD or at iTunes, the music that I listen to. But the tradeoff is that I’m always a little behind the times because I am less likely to take a chance on someone I know nothing about (Sturgill) until after I’ve seen a bunch of positive reviews.
June 24, 2015 @ 8:01 am
lol. really funny.
June 25, 2015 @ 4:17 am
Not surprisingly, Ms. Swift has her hand in photographers’ pockets, evidently . . .
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/1678652001/a-commerical-photographer-calls-out-taylor-swift-for-being-a-hypocrite