New Billboard Chart Changes Give Another Reason to Pay for Streaming Services

The best way to support your favorite artists and bands is to buy music from them and the independent labels that support them, either via CD or vinyl, or downloads. But since music streaming has become a common part of everyday life and a super convenient way to take music with you on the go, it makes sense to also have a subscription to a streaming service you prefer.
As was presented earlier this week when the NBA’s $400 million-dollar man LeBron James was quoted in an interview saying he was unwilling to pay for his music streaming, paying for a subscription is the more prudent way for music consumers to help support their favorite performing artists, the songwriters who contribute their words to music, and the other principals in the music making process. Though ad-supported free-side accounts do result in some revenue being accrued for your favorite creators, paying the simple $9.99 a month accrues much more, while still offering a very affordable price point for the access the streaming services provide.
Now there is an entirely new reason to consider transitioning from ad-based streaming to a paid account, and it’s based off the greater commitment paid subscribers show to the music they listen to as opposed to the free-siders. Announced on Thursday (10-19), Billboard has made it known they are tweaking the way their charts work in 2018, and one of the biggest changes is that songs streamed through paid accounts will be weighted greater on the charts than songs streamed through ad-supported formats.
“It is our goal at Billboard to accurately portray in an unbiased manner how music performs relative to other music,” Billboard says. “That job has become much more complicated throughout the years. For decades, there were just physical retail sales and radio airplay, whereas today there are many ways to consume and not all are created equal – from an access perspective, from a user-control perspective, from a revenue perspective, from a fraud-protection perspective and so on.”
Currently, Billboard uses different “tiers” to weight the importance of a play through a streaming service on their charts. For example, if a consumer plays a song on-demand, it counts greater than if that song is played for them in a more curated experience like Pandora. The listener is showing a greater interest and preference in an on-demand song. Now, whether a consumer paid for their service, or if it was ad-supported will also factor in.
“Beginning in 2018, plays occurring on paid subscription-based services (such as Amazon Music and Apple Music) or on the paid subscription tiers of hybrid paid/ad-supported platforms (such as SoundCloud and Spotify) will be given more weight in chart calculations than those plays on pure ad-supported services (such as YouTube) or on the non-paid tiers of hybrid paid/ad-supported services,” Billboard says.
Why would this matter to music consumers who want to support their favorite artists, and want to let their voices be heard about what the best music is in the marketplace at any given time? It’s because other consumers, the industry, booking agents, and potential representatives of artists regularly use Billboard’s charts to measure the appeal of the public for a given song, album, or artist. If most of an artist’s fans only listen via ad-supported streaming services, their voice will now measure less than the listeners who’ve shown that extra level of commitment to their music by ponying up the $9.99 per month.
“It is Billboard’s belief that assigning values to the levels of consumer engagement and access – along with the compensation derived from those options – better reflects the varied user activity occurring on these services,” the company says.
This could also mean a boost in the charts for independent artists, since most independent fans are more likely to pay for their music—streaming or otherwise—than passive mainstream music fans that maybe downloaded a streaming app, but are unwilling to pay for the service.
To simplify it, there are three major tiers: Paid, Programmed, and Ad Supported, with Paid creating the most points for your plays, and Ad Supported the least. This chart from Billboard helps break it down according to service:
Service | Audio/Video | Data Type |
---|---|---|
Amazon Music Unlimited | Audio | Paid |
Amazon Prime | Audio | Paid |
Apple Music | Audio | Paid |
Apple Music | Video | Paid |
Google Play | Audio | Paid |
Groove Music Pass (Xbox) | Audio | Paid |
Medianet | Audio | Paid |
Napster | Audio | Paid |
SoundCloud | Audio | Paid / Ad Supported |
Slacker | Audio | Paid |
Spotify | Audio | Paid / Ad Supported |
Tidal | Audio | Paid |
Tidal | Video | Paid |
Vevo on YouTube | Video | Ad Supported |
YouTube | Video | Ad Supported |
AOL Radio (Powered by Slacker) | Audio | Programmed |
Google Radio | Audio | Programmed |
Napster | Audio | Programmed |
Pandora | Audio | Programmed |
Slacker | Audio | Programmed |
– – – – – – –
Once again the importance of paying for your streaming service is coming into focus as the most responsible way music consumers can deal with the new streaming paradigm, but make sure their favorite artists are still supported.
October 19, 2017 @ 8:18 pm
thats great news!
October 19, 2017 @ 9:44 pm
Can’t wait for TT album review and Willie Nelson album review
October 20, 2017 @ 6:27 am
Trigger, thank you for sharing this important information! I only recently signed up for Spotify’s paid service. I don’t know why it took me so long. I buy CDs from my favorite artists that I feel compelled to support, and I suspect I always will. However, streaming has given me the opportunity to take a chance on artists I may not have otherwise checked out, really dive into their music….and then I can make sure to go to a show and buy merch if I dig them.
I am incredibly interested to see how this change affects the charts. As you stated, it seems like this will give those of us who are true music fans, and who “get” the value of music more say on what makes it to the top.
October 21, 2017 @ 6:00 am
I could have written this comment! In same boat. Recently signed up for paid Spotify. Really enjoying digging into new artists and old favourites. But that doesn’t mean I’ll stop buying CDs mp3s t-shirts or going to shows!
October 20, 2017 @ 8:05 am
I’m 56 years old. I don’t stream and probably never would even if it was completely free. I rarely listen to the radio or peoples “playlists”. 99% of the time I listen to full albums. If I don’t think an album is good enough as a whole to make my rotation. Then I could probably care less about 1 or 2 good songs on it. I want to own the files (preferably lossless) and do what I want with them which is usually throw them on iPod or flash drive for my car. Occasionally changing the order and cutting a song or 2. I know I’m a dinosaur. I’m fuckin old. Billboard as of today has 4, count them 4 Country singles charts all with the same songs in a slightly different order…..lol I watch them all a little but look at the album chart first.
October 20, 2017 @ 10:20 pm
You’re trying to listen to lossless files in the car? You will disregard a good song or two if you don’t like the whole album, yet you’re listening in digital format? You sound like you’re 56 because none of that makes a lick of sense.
October 20, 2017 @ 8:09 am
I pay $16.99 a month for Apple Music and LOVE IT! my whole family uses it because we all have different tastes in music. I can basically test out an album before I purchase it. Because I don’t get the chance to go to many live shows, I don’t mind paying an additional $8.99 to download a quality album and get the Vinyl copy from the artists website. Music is such and important part of life, I’ll never understand those who says it’s not worthy to be paid for… yet have no issues dropping $160 on a shitty UFC fight… on a side note LeBron is an over rated tool who couldn’t even carry Karl Malone’s jock strap let alone Michaels!
October 20, 2017 @ 10:22 pm
Your musical opinions are fine enough. Your basketball takes are terrible.
October 20, 2017 @ 8:51 am
You’re really not gonna let this go, are you?
Ok, so I suddenly realized (9 months later) that I have Amazon Prime, which includes Prime Music. I’ve been streaming nonstop like a crazy country fool and there’s no end in sight!
I definitely want to upgrade my service, but not sure whether to stick with Amazon or switch to Spotify or Apple. I thought Spotify was the “biggest” service (not sure if that’s still true), but I already have an iPhone, and Amazon is just so darn convenient…
Long story short, Trigger was right again, and I still win!
October 21, 2017 @ 5:56 am
Just pay the extra 7 bucks for Amazon unlimited if you already use prime. Excellent service in my opinion.
October 20, 2017 @ 11:25 am
I mostly use Spotify now and I would pay for Premium if I could but I don’t have the means to do so since I’m still living at home and no consistently paying job really so I’m stuck with free at the moment.
October 24, 2017 @ 2:16 pm
Well, well for once Billboard makes a smart move. This will REALLY help the charts because most paid subscribers are older and so the charts will not be dominated be teenage whims and song about throwing shade or giving the middle finger. IN fact I think this could restore some of my faith in mainstream modern music.
But first we have to see how it goes.