An Open Letter to Luke Bryan
Dear Luke Bryan,
Thanks for taking the time to read my letter, if in fact you do so. I can only imagine the time constraints a man of your success has, and you’ve already been taking of your time over the last few days to help clear up a mess that I guess I had some part in creating. Calling the families of Waylon Jennings and Merle Haggard to apologize about your recent comments about Outlaws—-characterized them as cocaine addicts “laying in the gutter, strung out on drugs“—was a noble gesture. I know you probably feel those words were a little twisted from what you meant, but whatever, water under the bridge at this point. We all make mistakes. It’s what we do afterwards that is the measure of the man. Putting the music aside, I’ve never had reason to believe on a personal level that you were anything less than a forthright dude, and if anything, this episode has reinforced that.
But I’m not writing to apologize, because frankly I don’t feel an apology is necessary. I felt what you said needed to be challenged, and I did so. Taking quotes that mischaracterize certain country music fans or artists, or cast dispersions at institutions or sentiments I believe strongly in and refuting them is something that’s pretty standard fare on Saving Country Music on a weekly, sometimes daily basis. But it’s funny how sometimes these quotes can get glossed over and barely raise a blip, and other times they breed controversy that reaches to the very crest of the genre where it’s all people are talking about. I can count half a dozen quotes uttered just in the last calendar year that were significantly more callous or incorrect compared to what you happened to say, yet not much was made of them beyond a dedicated segment of die-hard country readers. And then you have situations like with your ACM Awards co-host Blake Shelton and his “Old Farts and Jackasses” quotes that because of timing or other factors, blow up to grand proportions.
And don’t think it’s just the top artists of country who have to watch what they say or some opportunistic opinionator will abscond with it and turn it into World War 3. Just ask radio consultant Keith Hill about his “tomato” comments, or former Sony CEO Gary Overton about the “If you’re not on radio, you don’t exist” row. You never know what is going to touch a nerve at a given time and erupt into an imbroglio of viral proportions, or what will amount to a popcorn fart. Causing grand conflict is not necessarily the intent when a quote is called to the mat and extrapolated on by me or other writers, but the author doesn’t really have the ability to compartmentalize the reaction or control the outcome. It is the public who deems a quote or situation as one that is worthy of wider discussion or viral backlash.
Nonetheless, in my personal assessment, in the case of your particular quotes and measuring them against the reaction received compared to the concern they should have elicited, the punishment didn’t seem to fit the particular crime. Again, that’s not an apology; it’s more of an acknowledgement that maybe a misspeak and muddling of thoughts was made a little too much of. And upon that, I think we can mutually agree.
At the same time, the backlash is completely understandable. Just for a second, imagine standing in the boots of someone who would rather listen to someone such as Waylon Jennings or Merle Haggard as opposed to an artist like yourself. Representation of authentic country at award shows, on mainstream radio, and at special events like CMA Fan Fest has gone from marginal, to token, to virtually non-existent over the past five to ten years. And to make matters worse, these more traditional-leaning fans are characterized as fuddy-duddies—folks lost in time who don’t want country music to evolve and only want to listen to music that sounds exactly like Johnny Cash and Hank Williams over and over till kingdom come.
In truth, this depiction probably only represents about five to ten percent of non-mainstream country music fans. Talk about a mischaracterization, Saving Country Music gets painted with this brush often, when in reality I agree country music must evolve, and regularly make music recommendations upon that theory. Meanwhile it might be a silent majority of country music fans who are not happy with the current direction of the genre. That’s why you see artists like Willie Nelson and Merle Haggard scoring #1 records these days, along with other independent artists like Aaron Watson and Blackberry Smoke.
These people are angry Luke, because not only have they lost the fight for the heart of country music, then they have to sit back and be lampooned by popular culture, like many felt you did with your comments on Outlaw country. That is why the backlash was so heated, because these people already feel put under and marginalized, and now they’re being pursued with ridicule.
Country music is right smack dab in the middle of the culture war at the moment, but look, it doesn’t necessarily have to be this way. Right now, you’re the biggest artist in country music. You’re the top dog. And with that comes an opportunity for leadership that country music needs. I know, you’re just a performer and have enough on your plate, but just hear me out for a second:
The reason there’s so much conflict in country music, and why you felt the need to explain why you don’t sing about the same themes of Willie, Waylon, and Merle is because country music right now is two worlds living on top of each other. Think of it like Israel and Palestine, with two polarized factions fighting over the same piece of land. What country music is to you and your millions of country fans, is not what it is to millions of other country music fans. But we’re in luck, because unlike Israel and Palestine, there’s room for us all.
You may think I get some greedy satisfaction from causing a viral storm to swirl around your offhand Outlaw comments, but the reality is I hate this shit. Sure, it brings a little bit of renewed attention to this web portal, but I positively hate it, and I hated it when it happened with Blake Shelton’s “Old Farts & Jackasses” comments. I certainly don’t crave this style of vitriolic conflict, and I can’t imagine you do either. So how about we really start thinking about formulating pragmatic solutions where country music can stop being so top heavy and allow more older and traditional artists, more women, and more music of substance a chance to be heard, so performers like you can do your thing unfettered?
One idea that’s be floated out there is to split the country music format and have one version of country where you and other Top 40 artists can what you wish without worrying about whining traditionalists wanting their seat at the table, and another version that could be the country equivalent of classic rock, but maybe with some newer stuff mixed in theere too if it fits the style—a home for older artists like Willie and Merle, but one that also facilitates a radio forum for artists like Sturgill Simpson and Kacey Musgraves.
Of course, you don’t have the power to make this idyllic scenario turn into a reality any more than I do. But maybe if we all start rowing in the same direction, it could turn into a reality. And hey, that’s just one of many ideas of how to open up the music and reduce some of the animosity that exists between these two very distinct country music worlds.
Remember back to the 2014 ACM Awards last April when George Strait bested you for Entertainer of the Year? It was a big deal. Members of your posse even lost their cool and said George Strait’s win was nothing but a sympathy vote. And hey, maybe they were right. But think about how unjust it felt that you lost out even though you were arguably the bigger “Entertainer” at the time? That is how more traditional country artists and fans feel every time an award is handed out these days, or they listen to the radio, waiting for something they can relate to, and hear nothing. George Strait’s 2014 win might be the last big moment for authentic country music, but why does it have to be? Why not hand out traditional country awards right beside the contemporary awards so there’s never another situation like you faced at the ACM’s in 2014? Again, it’s just a thought.
But look, when folks felt like you called out Outlaw country music, they took it so personal because this isn’t just the music to them. Country it is the lives they lead. It is their cultural identity, and it is being robbed from them a little more every day. They feel like something very important to them is slipping away, and so that’s why they fight for it.
I did an exercise a while back looking at today’s big country artists, including yourself, and what they started off singing and playing in their careers. I know that deep inside you Luke there is a fan of music that is not as contemporary as the music you play today. And for the record, I agree with your assessment that aside from a few of your big hit singles, you are not a 100% “Bro-Country” artist like Florida Georgia Line for example, or a complete genre-shifter like Sam Hunt. I’d be laying if I didn’t tell you all of those Dallas Davidson singles you release are positively terrible in my opinion. But hey, it’s just an opinion.
My point is that when you started out in country music, you were much more similar to what Willie Nelson and Merle Haggard fans might want to listen to than what you are today. One of your first songwriting credits was for Travis Tritt. You debut album was called I’ll Stay Me. Deep inside of you, I know there’s a true country fan. Yes, we all change and evolve, and who am I to question your career path when it had led to such success. But that success can also bestow you a position of leadership to help country music navigate through this period of conflict.
Work with us. Help us. Just like you did when you reached out to the families of Waylon and Merle, extend a hand, open a dialogue, and work to bridge an understanding between the two factions of country fans so the next generation of country stars and fans don’t have to deal with these constant incendiary conflicts over and over again.
And maybe every once in a while, release on of those better album cuts as a single and help lead the music in a more substantive direction as well.
Sincerely,
Kyle “Trigger”
savingcountrymusic.com
July 15, 2015 @ 9:39 am
I miss early Luke Bryan. All My Friends Say was a good song.
There’s a video on Youtube of Luke doing soundcheck to Steve Wariner’s The Weekend. He sounds good singing it. If I were Pete Fisher, I’d have Steve and Luke sing it together the next time they’re both at the Opry. Not for damage control or anything, but because I think it would sound good.
July 15, 2015 @ 9:59 am
“I miss early Luke Bryan”
Me too. I liked his first couple albums, especially the now unfortunately-titled “I’ll Stay Me.”
July 16, 2015 @ 7:36 am
Luke is capable of writing and recording good music if he would just choose to do so. However, it is the system that tempts these guys. Prime example is his buddy Dallas Davidson. I have heard Dallas play live and the guy is an incredible talent. Just like Luke he is also a great guy. Dallas is fully capable of writing ‘real’ music, and country music at that. However, why would he? Right now in Nashville there is little motivation for guys like him to do so. Making the money these guys are can you blame him for writing pop ‘bro’ crap when the Nashville machine has been gobbling it up? To Trigs point, until someone is willing to ‘share the stage’ little is going to change. But I can promise you Dallas and Luke don’t like the crap they are putting out and they don’t truly believe the “we live on tailgates” excuse that is repeatedly thrown out. They are simply cashing in on a lifetime fortune while the opportunity presents itself and coming up with an excuse to consider it country music.
The trend will change but not until the masses stop buying it. Until then I will continue to purchase the music of real artist. Luke can be that if he choose to. Great letter.
July 16, 2015 @ 6:03 pm
if Dallas Davidson had any semblance of talent he wouldn’t waste it writing bad songs. if he had talent he would write good songs, if he writes good songs then brocountry is good. also, he has no class, he is a homophobe, prejudiced, misogynistic, scheming, drunk, arrogant and completely ignorant clown, and deserves to be treated as such. If he’s a good guy, as you claimed, then Jerry Reed and Mickey Rooney directed ‘Ocean’s Eleven’ and Hitler was the biggest star in Las Vegas, drawing bigger crowds than Elvis and Benjamin Franklin.
July 16, 2015 @ 8:24 pm
…what? Chris Stapleton has written plenty of shitty songs, too. Does he not have any semblance of talent?
What about the writer of Honkytonk Badonkadonk? Is he also talentless?
I don’t know the guy, and I don’t know the music that he writes for himself. Neither do you. We just know what he releases when he’s hired as a professional songwriter and told to write a hit.
July 17, 2015 @ 3:50 am
So what you just said was no one with talent writes shitty songs. I hope you were drunk when you wrote that.
2nd I love the irony here of the entire Outlaw debate but you call Dallas a drunk homophobe.
Look I said Dallas is putting out crap. But I promise you he knows it. My point is there is no motivation in Nashville for these guys to change and agreed with Trig idea. But I have been around Dallas plenty and yes he is a good guy. So is Luke Bryan.
July 17, 2015 @ 5:29 am
I think most artists, whom the majority of songwriting enthusiasts would say are great songwriters, do not write awful songs. That said, there are a lot of them that do, but those songs are usually one-offs, like Badonkadonk. Now Dallas Davidson has written some songs I like, I won’t lie. “If heaven wasn’t so far away” is a pretty good song, BUT the sheer amount of bad stuff outweighs the good, you claim that he’s well aware that he’s releasing bad stuff, but this interview would imply otherwise. http://tasteofcountry.com/dallas-davidson-bro-country/ this is the interview in which he says “what’s the backlash? more ticket sales?… we’re writing what people want to hear.” That is definitely a very shallow, materialistic quote.
You said he was a great guy, but here’s an SCM article about it. https://www.savingcountrymusic.com/bro-country-songwriter-dallas-davidson-arrested-uses-homophobic-racial-slurs. I don’t know him, and both Big Cat and Cool Lester are right that I can’t speak on his personality from experience, all I have is the evidence that he presents, which isn’t very good.
Also, I think you misunderstood my shitty songs comment. I didn’t mean that nobody with talent writes shitty songs, per se. Obviously a lot of them do, but most “songwriters” usually are better remembered for their more quality work, because that’s the stuff they put energy into. Jamey Johnson did write Badonkadonk but he also wrote “Cover You’re Eyes” and “Poor Man’s Blues” and “In Color.” Plus Jamey Johnson has never defended that song, to my knowledge, in an interview as either “what I know about” or “what people want to hear.” these are the two most common quotes used in defense of bad music, and they aren’t very strong arguments. Furthermore, Johnson, Harlan Howard, and Stapleton, all of whom have written some terrible songs, will best be remembered for the good stuff, whereas Dallas Davidson’s career will be synonymous with “Bro-Country” and will be laughed at and lampooned just like any other flash-in-the-pan subgenre that has fallen into disfavor.
July 16, 2015 @ 8:25 pm
Yeah, I totally get why they would take this time to build up a nest egg so that they can do whatever they want when they become commercially irrelevant in 5-10 years without having to worry about maintaining their lifestyle.
July 19, 2015 @ 8:29 pm
Good letter, but who will take the time to read it to him?
July 15, 2015 @ 9:52 am
Great letter, Trig.
I’ve shown my dislike of Luke Bryan a couple times on this site (and I think I’ll have many a opportunity to do it again in the future) but truth is, it took a lotta balls to apologize to Waylon and Merle’s family members, and i think this letter does a great job of addressing things.
Now we just hope Lukey Boy takes it to heart.
July 15, 2015 @ 10:04 am
Good letter. I hope it makes its way to Luke. I completely agree that a star like him could help build a bridge instead of polarizing people further. There is room for everyone. My main complaint with bro/pop-country has never been that it exists, but that it so quickly supplanted the music I love.
July 15, 2015 @ 10:09 am
*lying (delete)
July 15, 2015 @ 10:14 am
This was a very mature, honest, and well written letter. I think Luke Bryan has the power to propel country into a more traditional direction. If he released an album like he did in the beginning of his career, I think he would still gain a lot of success and other artists would follow suit. Wishful thinking perhaps, but I can dream, can’t I?
July 15, 2015 @ 10:26 am
This letter could end up being looked back on as monumental if it gets into his hands. Because I know if it does he will genuinely read it. And you deserve it Trig. Thats why I come here to read even though it often conflicts with artists I love. The integrity and compromise of this site keeps me coming back. Do the right thing Luke.
July 15, 2015 @ 10:33 am
Nice letter, Trigg.
As a CFO, I do fall in that group that doesn’t need “evolution”, to be happy. All I need is for the music to be Country, by sounding Country. Between 1945 and 1995, there was plenty of evolution to satisfy me. I really don’t understand the notion that evolution equates to improvement. There are lots of ways that “evolution” actually equates to degeneration.
Having said all that, I’m to the point now, that just having a radio station to listen to would satisfy me. I could’ve even tolerated Luke’s first album without changing the station, and maybe even find something to enjoy.
Luke may be a nice guy, and I like his voice, but anybody who sells their soul for money, has got to be an inch deep, and a mile wide.
July 15, 2015 @ 10:47 am
Great, GREAT read. I sincerely hope he sees it, even if nothing comes of that scenario. At least he’d understand a little bit. Back in the day, he also appeared in the writing credits of John Michael Montgomery’s 2008 album Time Flies on the song “With My Shirt On.”
July 15, 2015 @ 10:51 am
I don’t think Mr Bryan knows what imbroglio means.
July 15, 2015 @ 12:04 pm
He doesn’t know what country music is either
October 3, 2017 @ 2:17 pm
You are rite Barbara
July 16, 2015 @ 4:40 pm
Not going to lie, I had to use context clues
July 15, 2015 @ 10:53 am
Great letter, Trigger!
I have definitely, and constantly, been among the most vociferous critics of Luke Bryan’s musical output and direction since he released his second album “Doin’ My Thing”. I am being absolutely sincere when I’ve said that I have not genuinely enjoyed ONE single of his since “We Rode In Trucks”. And when I say that, I do not mean every single song he has released has been terrible. I thought “Play It Again” is effective as an earworm, as is “I Don’t Want This Night To End”. Conversely, I thought he got the sound right on “Rain Is A Good Thing” and “Kiss Tomorrow Goodbye”. But I haven’t enjoyed any of those songs, among his other worse offenders, all the same either because of the way their songwriting is framed, or having a toothless production (“Roller Coaster” could have been somewhat enjoyable if it wasn’t for the completely toothless production) or, worse, coming across as hollow and disingenuous in what’s intended to be a poignant theme (“Drink A Beer”).
That said, I do want him to get better and, as a person, he has never struck me as the douche Farce of Music, in particular, tend to make him out to be. I think even they knew they had crossed a line at some point with their weekly “Douche Bryan” photo feature, and have long dispensed of it. Because a lot of his recent actions just simply aren’t consistent with the douche archetype. Taking his nephew under his wing after another loss in his family is a mark of true character, as are wasting no time making apologies and amends in ways that strike me as sincere, as is inviting an eight-year old boy on stage to sing with him after noting his “Can I sing with you?” sign.
There was a previous review you shared of “Tailgates & Tanlines”, and while I robustly agree with it and concur the material deserved the thrashing it got…………………it was actually the final paragraph that resonated with me the most:
*
https://www.savingcountrymusic.com/luke-bryans-tailgates-tanlines-review-roast
“And even if that means you lose all your shiny expensive things and you have to go back to working some shitty job, if someday your in some lonely coffee shop singing your own songs, ones you wrote from the heart, and you have one moment that touches one other person, one soul, and it makes one bit of difference in that person”™s life, that will be worth way more than all the riches this album has brought you. Trust me.”
*
I’m not yet convinced Bryan has come to this realization, and the reason why is because while he has signaled in interviews that he has some songs with more meaning and feeling on “Kill The Lights”, he cites that category as “stuff that is as deep as ‘Drink A Beer'”……………which is about the worst possible example of a “deep” song Bryan could cite in that the entire song rings emotively mechanical and lyrically shallow.
But Bryan is no douche in my mind. He may have a fairly wide streaking lack of self-awareness, but he is no douche. I do hope he can reach further within and either co-write or interpret more songs that are of the life-changing variety. I am convinced he has them in him somewhere, much as he already proved this with “Tackle Box”, “The Car In Front Of Me” and “We Rode In Trucks” from his debut album.
And I would love to see this happen.
July 15, 2015 @ 11:06 am
Play it Again was one of his better songs… It won’t have a shelf life though, because overuse of ‘oh my god’ and ‘she was like’ really date the song to a time period, as well as age poorly. Cool Lester and I have gone back and forth over his singing: He has poor range, not a lot of ‘soul’ or power, and limited diversity. Tonally, in terms of vocal smoothness, as well as delivery, i.e. how he phrases a passage, not only does he have a pleasing voice, but for what he does he does it well. He doesn’t sound like a lot of people attempting and failing to rap, for instance.
July 15, 2015 @ 11:42 am
“Play It Again” actually would have been a good song if the writing relied less on bro-country bingo buzz-terms (not to mention a gratuitous shout-out to XM Satellite Radio and Dixie Cups) and more on describing the youthful sentimental feelings the narrator was feeling.
Because here’s the thing: “Play It Again” SOUNDS pretty good. And I actually consider Bryan’s vocals on that track stronger than on most of his other material. I actually think he nails that feeling of urgency that comes with youthful love/lust. I’m convinced in feeling he gives a damn the way he utters “You should have seen that smile, when I pulled out my old guitar!” He sounds emotionally invested in his reading of the lyrics in a way he oddly does not on songs that call for more emotional range like “Drink A Beer”.
It’s just the lyrics that keep “Play It Again” merely at passable status, in my mind. But as far as earworms are concerned, “Play It Again” gets it all right and it doesn’t surprise me at all that it is his highest-peaking Billboard Hot 100 hit to date.
*
On that note, I do agree with you on his vocals, for the most part, in the broader sense.
He clearly has a rather limited range, and I think he shares many of the same setbacks Jason Aldean does as a vocalist. Much like Aldean, Bryan comes across sounding too serious on songs that are clearly meant to be fun songs on paper to the extent you’re left wondering “Why so serious, my friend?”.
However, much like Aldean, Bryan knows how to make the most of his limitations when he sets his heart to it and inject a degree of pathos in his inflection and delivery. Aldean achieves this remarkably well on songs like “Don’t Change Gone”, “The Truth”, “Tryin’ To Love Me” and “Amarillo Sky”, while Bryan does likewise on the aforementioned “Play It Again”, “Do I” and a number of songs off his debut album.
It also helps that, unlike Aldean, who always comes across as unlikable on countless songs…………Bryan actually does come across as charming and charismatic more often than not. Sure, sometimes he stumbles on songs with douchey subject matter like “I Know You’re Gonna Be There”, “Games” and “Blood Brothers”, but I view them as unfortunate outliers with relation to his discography as a whole which is misguided and immature, but inoffensive all the same.
July 15, 2015 @ 12:08 pm
Luke Bryan, or so I’ve heard, can be somewhat limited when it comes to emotional maturity. a comment on a SCM article a looong time ago described an emotional meltdown ala a sixteen year old girl when an elderly security guard asked to see ID. Then I read comments on this very article, and people have lots of nice things to say about him.
Compare to Aldean, who consistently says rude stuff, insults people, cheats on women, and all in all acts unlikeable.
Say what you will about Brian and Tyler, they seem like nice, fun dudes. They never told me I was an old fart for not liking their music, or told me that I don’t like it because I’m narrowminded. They have, to date, respected the people who don’t like them, at least more so than a lot of current country acts.
July 15, 2015 @ 12:40 pm
Just to clarify, I wasn’t talking about Aldean and Bryan as people in real life, specifically, in my previous paragraph overall. I was talking about them as interpretive vocalists.
I haven’t made it any secret that I think Aldean is among the better album vocalists among mainstream country/”country” A-listers. I think many can’t see the forest for the trees when it comes to his discography in the broader sense. They rightfully skewer his terrible lead singles and his reliance on this “macho”, brim-over-his-eyes, aggressively self-serious douchey rocking cowboy archetype, but readily assume his discography as a whole is much the same……………….and that’s simply not true. If anything, the tropes and cliches aside…………..songs like “She’s Country”, “Take A Little Ride” and “My Kinda Party” are the outliers in relation to his discography as a whole: which is heavily mid-tempo Adult Contemporary with accents of pedal steel.
And, as an interpretive vocalist, I think he sells his share of material that calls for more emotive release quite well. In fact, there’s more singles of his to date (“Amarillo Sky”, “The Truth”, “Tattoos On This Town”, “Fly Over States”) I like than Bryan (“We Rode In Trucks”) and the same rings true with deeper cuts: where each of Aldean’s albums to date has at least two songs I would consider mature standouts (“Church Pew or Barstool”, “Don’t Change Gone”, “Tryin’ To Love Me”, “On My Highway”, “Back In This Cigarette”, etc.) that transcend the format’s most aggressive cliches and some emotional weight. Sadly, Bryan does not, in my opinion, outside of his debut.
*
Oh, most here have found I’m a lot more lenient on Florida Georgia Line compared to most critics.
I actually don’t think they’re douches either. At least to me, I consider them more blissfully ignorant. They definitely lack self-awareness as recording artists as reflected by their obliviousness of “bro-country”, but not in a way that’s disparaging or injurous. And there’s also an unmistakable energy to their performances and delivery that convinces me they truly DO sound like they’re having a good time and living up to their party-hardy mission statement.
They’re quite limited in vocal range too, obviously, but I have to admit their read of “Dirt” was genuinely affecting and proved they know how to deliver emotion. And while I may not like the songwriting on most of their other songs, there are moments where Hubbard’s admittedly annoying Auto-Tuned to death vocals nonetheless hint at signs of promise in selling nostalgia and/or reflective material remarkably well down the line. Honestly, I thought if not for the gratuitous Auto-Tune and overwrought production, “Hell Raisin’ Heat of the Summer” would have sounded pretty good because, in part, Hubbard actually elicits a semi-melancholic tone in his vocal delivery that nearly won me over. Same with the title track from “Here’s To The Good Times”.
I think the duo is capable of surprising us more down the line. Surely they have to at the very least be aware enough that “Dirt” is their most successful single this album era by far, and even if artistic quality is not one of their concerns……………..if their goal is to remain commercially relevant, it would be wise to take that to heart. It may be the defining line between having a career marked with longevity and becoming a flash in the pan.
July 15, 2015 @ 2:27 pm
Nadia:
I think the FGL guys are in an unwinnable position. They’re beer and truck songs got them where they are, the “Bro” stuff made these guys; Jason and Luke jumped on board, and as a result I think all of them have bought tickets aboard a cruise liner circa 1912. the FGL guys can’t change at all or they’ll alienate all the people who bought into the “bro” stuff, and the people who want substance likely won’t give them much of a chance. Luke and Jason have a similar problem, they won over the “bro” crowd, but they’ve alienated so many people in the process. I think it’s easier to win new fans that to win back fans. And these guys know it, and they’re afraid to go back to their traditional stuff, because the market for that stuff has moved on to Isbell’s new album and bought up some Gosdin reissues, and the bro audience is jumping ship as the subgenre fades. Neither audience is going to want any of them.
July 16, 2015 @ 8:28 pm
Yeah, I won’t say that he can do a lot, but what he can do, he does really, really well.
That’s why it’s so annoying that he chooses to record such shitty music, haha.
July 15, 2015 @ 11:37 am
I’d forgotten about that paragraph from the “Tailgates & Tanlines” review.
July 15, 2015 @ 10:56 am
Great letter, Kyle. No one who reads it can ever doubt that you’re on a mission to save country music.
July 15, 2015 @ 11:09 am
Up until about paragraph 5 I was doubting your intentions, but now I see what you did there. Shame on me of little faith!
I really admire this type of thinking that you display here. Cooler heads can prevail, and you stay true to your beliefs. Very well done, sir.
I swap between 5 country stations and 5 ‘rock’ stations. More and more I can’t find a single song to listen to on a 20 minute drive. So sad.
July 15, 2015 @ 12:03 pm
I met Luke backstage once. My friend was the guitar player for an act that opened for him.
He could have told me to get the F out of his dressing room, but he was really gracious about letting me hang back there with my friend, even talking to me briefly and being a pretty down to earth, nice guy. I’m not a fan of his music, but he seemed like a good dude. It doesn’t surprise me that the guy I was exposed to that night would call and apologize. It’s just a shame he’s “kicking up so much dust” and crap onto the airwaves!
July 15, 2015 @ 1:14 pm
Good letter, and I feel YOUR intentions are in the right place, Trigger. It’s letters like this that show that you live this, breathe this, and truly care about the genre of country music. Simply put, you GET IT.
Bryan’s intentions, on the other hand, not so much. While I think it’s admirable that he phoned and apologized for his ill-advised comments, he did so because he was between a rock and a hard place. The fact that we are more or less celebrating his actions for something that any decent person should have done anyways is kind of sad. He did this as a face-saving move, plain and simple. While on the surface he may think that he was sincere, I really doubt that he meant it deep down. This comment would have floated on by if he wasn’t called on it, and he wouldn’t have gone back and apologized without some reason to.
I don’t despise Luke Bryan or anything, I just think that he’s a very “surface” guy, doesn’t think much about what he says, and is in the music business for all that he can get. Of course, that’s the aim of being in the business for many artists, being successful and making money, so I can’t fault him for that. Overall, though, he’s just a simple guy whose handlers didn’t vet his comments before they went to press. He’s a middling musician who just needs to think before he speaks.
July 15, 2015 @ 1:25 pm
Trigger, what do you mean by split the country format in two? Like have one side that’s the traditional real authentic country music and then have the other side be metro/bro/pop country? I hope that’s not what your going along the lines of.
July 15, 2015 @ 2:07 pm
This is not my idea. Right now Cumulus Media and Big Machine Records are trying to expand a new radio format called NASH Icon that looks to return older artists to mainstream country radio. Other independently-owned stations have followed suit with their own formats that are focused more on “classic” country. Of course with anything, the devil is in the details, but if a new classic format for country music was allowed to thrive, I think it would open up significantly more avenues for more classic country music to be heard. And if this happens, why not give them separate awards at the CMA and other places too?
We can dream all we want, but Luke Bryan, Florida Georgia Line, and Sam Hunt are not going away. It’s simply an idea of how to solve the problem of country music being so top heavy.
July 15, 2015 @ 2:44 pm
Sorry, I might’ve read that part of the letter wrong, But you still think that these hyper-trends should go away and country should get on a stable path? That’s what I think.
July 15, 2015 @ 6:23 pm
Yes, I agree. The hyper trends are Not doing any good for anybody, regardless of how it might look in the short term.
July 15, 2015 @ 6:27 pm
Did you mean NOT doing any good for anybody? Sorry I’m a little confused.
July 15, 2015 @ 6:37 pm
Yes, “not.”
July 18, 2015 @ 8:41 pm
In Chicago CBS who owns one Country station (WUSN) is laying people off, and the other other Country station (WEBG recently converted from a Spanish station) is Clear Channel/iHeart run on the cheap. Sadly, I don’t see either of those scenarios resulting in opening up Country radio playlists here.
July 15, 2015 @ 1:42 pm
Part of this open letter sounds like Luke Skywalker talking to Darth Vader, “There is still good in you I can feel it.” LOL! And it ain’t that far from that kind of metaphor if I do say so myself. Not even counting your previous article comparing Star Wars and country music.
July 15, 2015 @ 2:13 pm
Why should Luke Bryan pay any attention to this “letter” or anything you write? You say in pieces like this that there’s nothing personal, but in reviews and rants you call him and some of his best friends (FGL) douchebags and other not so friendly insults. You even wrote an whole freaking piece about him having a vagina.
I love all of the new music you bring to this site trig, and I wish Luke Bryan’s newer stuff was better, but why should he suddenly warm up to you and create a new format that he wouldn’t even be a part of? When you write satire pieces and your cuss-filled rants about Luke, you lose the right to try to have a serious conversation with him. Can’t have it both ways.
July 15, 2015 @ 2:31 pm
You raise some good points, but you also missed the point.
Trigger has never insulted Luke Bryan personally, he has insulted the person Luke Bryan creates with his songs, the “Shake it for Me” guy is a misogynistic prick who can’t respect women and is probably very shallow. Just like Johnny Cash never went to Folsom Prison, Luke’s personality cannot be inserted into his material where it doesn’t belong. The article very clearly states that Mr Bryan has no authority to create a new format, nor did it ask him to. It expressed a desire for both parties to have their own ping pong table, instead of always fighting over the one. Luke would benefit because his detractors would have their own format, and his detractors would benefit because they would have a place to go where they got music they liked. It’s a case of two ping pong teams who play the game differently only having one table and not playing well together.
July 15, 2015 @ 3:27 pm
How has he not insulted Luke personally?
“Listen Luke, seriously. Man to metrosexual country douche.” Sounds like a personal insult. There’s plenty others on just about any review trig’s done on Luke.
I’m not even trying to defend Luke either, I agree a lot of his songs warrant strong criticism. But if trigger is going to use him and his music as a punch line for jokes consistently and not write respectful criticisms on his music, why should Luke bother to deal with him? If you were an artist and someone wrote an article about you losing an award for having a vagina, would you level with the author?
July 15, 2015 @ 3:30 pm
For the record, I know (or believe), trig doesn’t have anything personal against Luke Bryan or any artist on a human to human level. But I just think the writing style of this website against guys like Luke kind of closes the door to seriously talk with mainstream artists.
July 15, 2015 @ 4:24 pm
Tom: Bryan is almost forty, he’s mature enough he should be able to handle criticisms, even about his genitalia. That said, Trigger was not the one to throw the first punch in this verbal joust. Shelton called us all old farts and jackasses, Aldean called us narrowminded, and Rucker called us crazy. The pop country crowd went on the offensive, not the traditionalists.
July 15, 2015 @ 4:38 pm
I see what you’re saying. My whole comment was more about/for trigger and SCM than anything else. Regardless, it doesn’t really matter, I just want to hear solid country music on the radio more than anything else.
July 15, 2015 @ 6:32 pm
First off, I’m not asking Luke Bryan to make a new format. Cumulus and Big Machine combined have been unable to do that so far, and that’s their portion of the industry. What I was trying to highlight is that there are solutions out there to certain problems, and his leadership might be helpful.
I’m not going to sit here and try to sugar coat anything I’ve said about Luke Bryan in the past, but there is the understanding of satire. Think about when Comedy Central puts on a roast of a celebrity. Many times the people doing the roasting are professional comedians whose job it is to go and pick the celebrity apart. It’s a humor-based art form. Of course Luke Bryan doesn’t have a vagina. People say all kinds of evil things about me as well, but hey it comes with the territory. If people don’t want to take this letter seriously, then so be it. But it comes from the heart, and that’s the best I can do.
July 18, 2015 @ 7:30 am
You hit the nail on the head here Tom. I started gravitating to this site a while back and have loved the “intent” of what Trig is trying to accomplish here, but the personal attacks on these artists have soured me numerous times. I (like you Trigger) can’t stand most of what I’ve heard from Luke Bryan. With that being said, your name calling (or as you call it, “satire”) is sophmorish. If that is the only way you can keep attracting readers then you are no better than the “artists” you continually bash for THEIR sophmorish lyrics/songs. I think you do a great service to the music community with this site. Like you, I would love to see country music return to it’s roots, to something that is far better than what is being produced today. But chill on the playground banter Trig. “We all bleed red. We all fall down”. Luke Bryan is human and said something he now regrets (just like you and I & everyone else walking this planet has done). At least the man has tried to make some kind of restitution with those you feel he’s offended. Quit trying to act holier than thou with these guys and just stick with what you do best. The industry needs voices like yours to challenge them on a musical level and that is where you can make a difference Trig.
July 18, 2015 @ 7:54 am
Hey Dooie78,
Like I responded to Tom, I think this is a fair concern. But please understand that is why I wanted to post this open letter, to talk to Luke Bryan man to man, to ride above all the satire and simply talk about the issues and the circumstances surrounding them. A lot of the stuff people are concerned about was posted years ago. I posted this right now. I’m not going to go back and try to act like that other stuff never happened because I can’t. All I can do is try to address the situation as best I can in the moment, and that is what I did here. It came from the heart, and hopefully people can see that and override other concerns that are mostly in the past.
July 15, 2015 @ 2:25 pm
I was reading another aritcle about this whole fiasco and apparently THIS statement below was the comment (not even a question) by an interviewer that lead Luke Bryan to make is ill-placed remarks.
“The party energy of [country music] right now, with all those hip-hop and rock influences, is so infectious.”
July 15, 2015 @ 2:48 pm
You know sometimes I wonder why the younger generation buys into this shit, can’t you just tell that it’s shitty music? And I also wonder why so many young white people are into rap music? I’m a classic rock/classic country guy and I don’t like rap music almost at all.
July 15, 2015 @ 6:10 pm
I think marketing is a big part of it and image. For example when I go to the mall all the stores sell the same stuff (overall) no matter what brand; same styles, same prints etc. There is no real diversity because three companies seem to own everything and so that is why so many people have no personal style and look like clones.
Same with music, there is only so much marketing space and the majority of people in my experience DO NOT want to or know how to take the time effort it takes to find artists outside the mainstream top 40 circle. It is just too much work for most people. Hence you have sights like this that help out but even finding site like this isn’t easy.
And lastly young people are particularly prone to group think and not wanting to be left out so being the dissenter and saying you don’t like Luke Bryan or One Direction or Niki Minaj doesn’t help your social standing EVEN THOUGH when queried most young people claim they, “don’t give a beep what other people think”. And then of there is the whole idea that you’re parents hate it so it must be cool (i.e. rap music) coupled with the idea of living dangerously through raps lyrics etc.
But what boggles my mind is at dance club people my age and older love the new stuff more than the old and they grew up on James Brown, Chic, Patti Labelle, music with soul & a groove and they all go crazy when Pitbull comes on the speakers. I mean Patti Labelle!!! No autotune in that woman yet Taylor Swift will get the screams from the mid-life yuppies around me.
July 15, 2015 @ 6:41 pm
I would argue that groupthink is much less of a factor that it used to be. With the rise of the Internet, the cultural “bell curve” has significantly widened. People no longer have to listen to radio only in order to find new music, since they can discover new genres will a simple Google search.
As an example, compare the transition from jazz to rock in the 50s and 60s with the rock to rap transition in the 90s and 00s. In the first case, jazz was almost completely stamped out of popular consciousness by the end of the transition period, leaving the Big Band and Rat Pack legends largely in the dust. On the other hand, even now that the rock-to-rap transition is complete, indie rock still retains a small but long-term presence due to online distribution, and classic rock legends are regular fixtures at the Grammys.
July 15, 2015 @ 6:32 pm
Rap and rap-based music has been the primary choice of young whites for about two decades now. Asking why young people like rap is like jazz fans of yore asking why young people of that era liked rock.
July 16, 2015 @ 8:33 pm
Seriously…
August 16, 2015 @ 9:50 am
The reason the younger generation buys in to this shit is because it is their avenue of rebellion against generations before them. Whereas Generation X rebelled against its elders by shock value, rawness, and keeping it real, the millenial generation rebels against Generation X through rampant collectivism, conformism, consumerism/corporatism, and selling out.
But I think the reason older people buy in to this shit is because their lives are so empty. They are slowly realising that 40 is not the new 18. They also feel that life after high school sucks. So they will bow to any trend or fad that makes them feel “young” “Hip” and cool nowadays. People cannot age gracefully and with style anymore, so they have to live in a perpetual state of teenage bliss. Just my two cents.
October 14, 2015 @ 8:01 am
Boy do I ever agree with this comment. One of my major pet peeves is older people trying to hang onto some eternal youth. There are all kinds of theories on when, why, and how this began, and at the end of the day I really don’t have the definitive answer. What I do know is that in sheer reaction, it has made me run the other way and absolutely embrace my aging (over half century), and my old-fogeyism. I had my day to be 16, 21, etc, it’s someone else’s day.
That doesn’t mean I don’t think there shouldn’t be a place for people my age (and our music) somewhere in this world.
June 27, 2016 @ 4:18 am
I think the older people is worse, however. Teenagers, for the most part, haven’t been around the block, so I don’t really blame them because they don’t know better yet. The thirty and fortysomethings that lap this up with a ladle, however, have no excuses.
July 15, 2015 @ 2:58 pm
I really enjoy your website…I don’t always agree with everything & enjoy when you focus on the positive that’s out there far more than the negative…I’ve become a fan of quite a few artists after reading your reviews & listening to their albums…this is without a doubt the best thing I’ve read that you have written!
July 15, 2015 @ 3:07 pm
Thanks Josh, glad you found the site.
July 15, 2015 @ 3:09 pm
” These people are angry Luke, because not only have they lost the fight for the heart of country music, then they have to sit back and be lampooned by popular culture, like many felt you did with your comments on Outlaw country. That is why the backlash was so heated, because these people already feel put under and marginalized, and now they”™re being pursued with ridicule.
Country music is right smack dab in the middle of the culture war at the moment “…..
Trigger, I wonder if you would be kind enough to expound upon this some more? I am curious to know from you whom – and or what – you believe is behind this culture war.
I know you have maintained that you do not often invoke political opinions nor do you like comments after your posts to center around political ideology but this question is important in the broader context of the conversations about Bro Country and the type.of.music this site is trying to save.
I ask you because you are quick to admonish people, moderate comments, and even delete comments in certain instances when followers express points and opinions about songs or artists through the very same prism. So for future reference please do so. And I’m not being sarcastic or trying to down you. I just want to know where you are coming from and your thought process on this.
July 15, 2015 @ 3:31 pm
This isn’t about politics. It’s about the culture war between traditional country and modern “country”. To delve deeper, it is about heartfelt, narrative-driven songs about serious topics vs. party songs that list “country” artifacts and focus only on fleeting enjoyment. Then there is also the musical component, most importantly melody vs. the lack thereof.
Also, Trigger is one of the loosest moderators that you will find. He is loath to delete or even edit comments, and only does so in the case of threats, extremely vulgar language, or comments that strongly distract from the topic of the thread.
July 15, 2015 @ 3:52 pm
With all due respect, let him answer for himself. His comments are not about “a war between melodies and lyrics” and refer to “the culture war” and “popular culture” lampooning them in addition to having lost the fight for the heart of Country music. That’s why is asked Trigger the question directly. I want to know what he thinks. Thanks.
July 15, 2015 @ 5:42 pm
Ryder,
First off, when I talk about the culture war, I’m not talking about politics. There is a political quotient to the culture war of course, but this more has to do with the interfacing of urban vs. rural, rich vs. poor, old vs. new, etc. It’s a constant, ongoing thing. Country used to be one of the steady compass points in the cultural war for years as a symbol of the old and the rural. Now it is a battleground between old and new, urban and rural. That’s about the best way I can describe it, and I hope that helps shed some light.
As for deleting and moderating comments and admonishing people, I have to respectfully disagree with your assessment. I think anyone can look at my comment sections and see dissent and debate are strongly welcome, and I am committed to offering an open forum for all opinions. It doesn’t mean I will always agree with them and I may pipe up in the comments myself. But isn’t meant to admonish anyone, it’s to share opinions and perspectives.
July 15, 2015 @ 5:48 pm
Exactly. From a demographic perspective, the country audience has become richer, more urban/suburban, and younger. There is a political correlation here (today’s audience is likely more libertarian than past audiences, since richer generally means more economically conservative, whereas younger and less rural generally mean more socially liberal), but it is just a correlation, and not much more.
July 16, 2015 @ 7:55 am
I must say I am surprised by both of your responses. I see it in a much broader perspective and text to what is happening in what is seemingly every aspect of American culture. That is, the rewriting, recreation, erasing, marginalizing, dismissal, etc… of what certain people (the vast majority at one time) hold dearly. Whether it be country music, the Confederate flag, religious freedom, faith in our legal system and institutions, and a host of other things – as examples.
Music has always been at the center of every single political and cultural upheaval and has been used as a vehicle to change peoples minds and foster a way of thinking and believing, creating a “moral value system” so to speak. It is both incidental and on the periphery, simultaneous to being at the center of movements and transformations. And that music (and its lyrics) is ever present in the minds of people listening.
When I observe the conversation about Bro Country music vs. traditional country music I look deeper than just the first layer of its “crappy lyrics and rap and pop with cowboy hats and boots all mixed together”. I know that the singers don’t really care much beyond the fact that they are making a fortune spewing it. I wonder why the music industry itself, and institutions like the Grand Ole Opry, are pushing this music and abandoning the original and traditional style of country music. It is not simply because “this is what young people want” and “its all about money and this is what sells and makes profit”. That may be some part of the equation but it is not “thee” equation.
Identifying why it is occurring might help change the trajectory of where it is going, naive as that may sound. In large part, I think, its popularity is not so much because it is in such high demand and preferred, rather than its just what the industry has bombarded country music consumers with and offers no other (or few) mass/mainstream options. In other words, the listeners are following the industry rather than the industry respond to the desire of the fans. My curiosity is to whether or not country music fans, specifically those that live in regions where the roots of country music derive, will ever reject the rap/pop/electronic bastardizations or will they identify with it and cherish it.
July 16, 2015 @ 8:06 am
And I truly view this as a conversation, not an argument, and I hope you dont view it that way. I am just trying to take the opportunity to learn what other people that I may or may not have much in common with think and why they feel how they do.
July 16, 2015 @ 2:05 pm
I have thought about this a bit, and I think that the idea behind bro-country is about a certain type of pandering.
Here is a political analogy: when economic and cultural issues are combined, blacks and Latinos have always leaned liberal, and Southern whites have always leaned conservative. Therefore, even in the absence of identity-based politics, blacks and Latinos would have always voted Democratic since the New Deal, and Southern whites would have become Republican anyway following the rise of cultural issues like abortion in the 60s and 70s.
The problem with these demographic imbalances in voting, however, is that a demographic group’s voting pattern is shaped like a concave-down parabola. Essentially, the political consultants get wind of the fact that group X is favoring them, and then tailor the party’s appeals to specifically energize group X and gain even higher margins. Therefore, we got the Democratic Party dropping its broad working-class appeal and using issues like affirmative action and immigration demagoguery instead to energize and maximize its share of blacks and Latinos. At a more subtle level, the Republican Party started to use the “Southern strategy” and coded racial appeals to energize and maximize its share of the Southern white vote.
As increasing numbers of Southern whites flocked to the Republicans and increasing numbers of non-whites flocked to the Democrats, we began to see demonization of these groups by the other party’s base. Today, liberals regularly attack Southern whites as racist uninformed hicks, and conservatives regularly attack blacks and Latinos as criminals, moochers, etc.
As a result, in 2012, large numbers of liberal-leaning white Southerners voted for Romney, while large numbers of conservative-leaning non-whites voted for Obama. We see this same polarization occurring with regard to gender as well. Our politics, due to the consultant class, has shifted from issues to identity.
…
How does this all apply to country music? Well, in the late 00s, the average country music fan became significantly younger for a variety of reasons. For a few years, the industry ignored this since the young fans loved the existing country music of that period anyway. However, the problem with money (just like the problem with votes in politics) is that you can never have enough. The industry decided to take advantage of the shift in their fan base and tailor the songs specifically to the young audience. They figured that bro-country could keep and even energize their young female fan base while also attracting young males and bringing in young pop fans, even if many middle-aged and older fans were lost in the process.
July 16, 2015 @ 2:07 pm
Just as a note: the political analogy was meant only as an analogy. I do not want to start another political discussion here but would instead prefer to focus on the music industry aspect of the comment.
October 14, 2015 @ 8:09 am
To Ryder-Amen, amen, and amen. I have wondered if there isn’t some conscious decision, somewhere, by someone, to destroy country music as it always was because it was a mostly conservative bastion, and conservative bastions of every kind are being destroyed now. It seems it wasn’t enough for the other side to have its own voice, they have to destroy any opposing voices too.
July 15, 2015 @ 3:37 pm
I really don’t have anything to say after reading this. Well done, Trigger.
July 15, 2015 @ 3:43 pm
Personally, I think I’d rather there not be a genre split. I listen to Sirius’s 2000’s country a lot, and most of it is unoffensive, country music (with discernible fiddles and not electronic beats). I think going back to that still could be a realistic goal. I like hearing songs from Dierks’ “Riser” and McGraw’s “Sundown” albums on the radio. A genre split would throw those songs into playlist full of Sam Hunts and Chase Rices. I don’t want to sit through a song by FGL and a FGL wanna-be just to hear the Zac Brown or Josh Turner single.
July 15, 2015 @ 3:49 pm
That said, its an absolute shame that the Turnpike Troubadours new single, “Down Here”, won’t be on any regular country radio. Its a easy, pleasing song to listen to, with a meaningful story told in a fun way. It has fiddles and steel guitars, but sounds completely fresh and original. If country radio could through songs like this in place of songs like “House Party”, everyone would benefit.
July 15, 2015 @ 6:35 pm
The Turnpike Troubadours are an excellent example of why a format split could be beneficial. They would fit right in on a more classic style of country radio and have music that would appeal to a wide audience. They’re young guys that lots of listeners can relate to ,young and old.
July 15, 2015 @ 9:45 pm
I have thought the exact same thing for years regarding Jason Boland and Stranglers. Lots of well written songs and music with contemporary traditionalism.
July 15, 2015 @ 4:18 pm
Very nice letter Trigger. I really like the early Luke Bryan I would like to see him return to that soon.
July 15, 2015 @ 4:25 pm
Dig the letter Trigger.
Here’s hope: received a pitch request today… looking for songs that are NOT Bro Country, for a top-10 Male Country Artist. Apparently, his producers do NOT want to see songs about tailgates, drinking, moonlight drives, girls in short-shorts, etc. Funniest part? Those topics are all actually listed as UNWANTED in the pitch request.
Love it.
July 15, 2015 @ 5:12 pm
Congratulations! I hope your songs gain fame throughout country radio and that you earn all the royalties that you deserve.
July 15, 2015 @ 5:13 pm
Thanks, Eric! But not to misrepresent – this was simply a call for pitches. I’m just happy that Nashville finally wants to see some meaty songs again. The requests we’ve been seeing have been drivel for quite a while.
July 16, 2015 @ 4:10 am
Good to hear. I feel this trend has been emerging over the last 12-18 months. Electra aligning with Dave Cobb is one major example. Other ‘Alt-Country’ artist signing with major record labels are others.
I think the record companies are rushing to ‘hedge’ their bets and make sure they have some diversity in their portfolios.
July 15, 2015 @ 6:13 pm
Say what you want, you are just trying to get every last drop of milk out of this teat that you can. I enjoy your site, I’ve discovered a lot of good music that I might not have by reading your reviews. That said, that is exactly what you are doing here.
July 15, 2015 @ 6:21 pm
Okay?
July 15, 2015 @ 8:09 pm
Trigger,
Thank you for this website and thanks for this Thoughtful open letter to
Luke Bryan. I am new to this site and I found it by posting a very lengthy
post on Luke Bryan’s video for The God AwFul “Kick the dust up”. Just
Hate it! I was encouraged to come over to this site for thoughtful
debate on Country music…Happy I did. Luke Bryan hopefully will
reflect on this past week ,cuz something tells me he got a hell of
a lot of Push-Back for his comments and just maybe this is what
was needed for him to Wake up and STAND UP and Write COUNTRY
MUSIC. HE CAN DO IT AGAIN….HE STARTED OUT AS LUKE BRYAN
and became someone who just gave up on Country Music , why?
HOPE this letter gets to Luke, he sure needs it.
Thanks again.
July 15, 2015 @ 8:12 pm
Glad you found it Cilla.
July 15, 2015 @ 10:09 pm
Luke Bryan and Jason Aldean both had some really good contemporary ‘but country” songs/albums in the beginning. Although I’ve been listening to country music for 35 years, I am not opposed to country music evolving as it should. I was rocking right along with these artists CDs and really enjoying that early stuff. I’m not stuck in some time machine that only wants to hear the same sound over and over. What I do want to hear is QUALITY. Somehow it’s been lost in Nashville and the sooner people like Luke Bryan start to turn back to their own pen and paper, the better. Surely these artists know when they are being pitched songs (or even in the middle of recording them), that they can do so much better…because they already have. There’s obviously a lot of politics involved these days and it’s a damned shame.
July 16, 2015 @ 7:09 am
Amen! These Country music artists Choose their songs…as I said, Luke Bryan started out as a country singer and should have grown into a Better country artist but chose the $$$ that comes with higher sales to a Much younger generation of kids. Luke is at the TOP of his game right now. He CAN chose to turn this thing Around for the better and REALLY put out QUALITY Country Music. GROWING UP is never easy,but he can be the Example for stirring Nashville Back to COUNTRY music.
July 16, 2015 @ 1:54 am
The problem with music is there is no money due to lack of sales. Until some kind of regulation can be mandated and all this free shit dry up, then all we are gonna have is this market where money is made off “cool” pop trends geared to the youth, kind of how rap and hip hop were in the late 90s 2000s. Blame Luke Bryan or whoever, but at least when record sells were booming in the 90s songwriting was a hell of a lot better for the most part too!
July 16, 2015 @ 2:25 am
Rap had already taken over by the mid 90s, when record sales were very high and rising.
The highest record sales of all time came in 2000, when Britney Spears, N’Sync, and other groups sold over 1 million albums in the first week.
July 16, 2015 @ 8:36 pm
Yeah, rap didn’t really pivot towards pop until 50’s ascent.
July 16, 2015 @ 3:57 am
You are exactly right and why these guys live on the road as much as they do to make money. I purchase music online of the artist I like as a way to support them. I could pay $10 a month a get unlimited music. Honestly I can’t believe legally that still has not been stopped. BUT at the same time the artist are hesitant to rally together to strike against it.
I encourage everyone here to BUY the music of artist you like. Personally I think it is also a good investment because one day your libraries in the $10 services could go away and be wiped out. Own your music and support your artist.
July 16, 2015 @ 5:16 am
Amen! I only own physical music. part of it’s just the fear that the internet won’t keep my favorite stuff for me forever, part of it’s the fact that the rare stuff like The Liverpool Fishermen live, Dave Kirby’s solo album, Hag’s ‘My Love Affair With Trains,’ or Grappeli/Venuti’s ‘Venupelli Blues’ aren’t online in the first place. And a big part of it is the power high that comes from gazing at my huge collection of cds, tapes, albums, books and music magazines as if I’m a dragon who’s guarding a great treasure from a company of dwarves and a Hobbit.
July 18, 2015 @ 2:00 pm
Just out of curiosity, what do you find to be illegal about streaming services?
It might be a crappy deal for artists and I can agree we should all support our favorite artists, but from what I have seen and heard a lot of it has to do with artists getting screwed over by their labels more than the services.
Likewise fans and artists can’t expect streaming services to pay out as much as legally downloaded music. Especially when you are essentially renting the music.
While it sucks for artists, they desperately need to learn to live with this new music economy. It sucks, but streaming isnt going away and people moved away from the idea of music ownership in the 90’s.
July 19, 2015 @ 5:39 am
First “people moved away from from the idea of music ownership in the 90’s” ….. Maybe as a trend but obviously ITunes is alive and well. I still buy all my music digitally so I can own it and to support the artist.
Second, if an artist does not give their permission for their music to be streamed then it is illegal. Find me an musician that believes the .006 of a penny (literally) streaming fee is fair. I commend Taylor Swift for standing up against Spotify and I think you are going to see others follow suit. It’s ridiculous these artist can put their heart and soul into art and then give it away for free. That’s just fucked up. I agree with Swift I do think it’s going to change. Is streaming going away? Obviously not but I could see the pay structure changing to reward these artist for their hard work.
July 19, 2015 @ 7:59 am
“people moved away from the idea of music ownership in the 90”™s”
Not in the 90s, but rather in the 00s. Album sales actually rose throughout the 90s and peaked in 2000, with multiple albums going platinum in the first week. After that, sales began a precipitous decline due primarily to the rise of the Internet.
July 16, 2015 @ 7:56 am
I detest the fact that Luke and many many other bros , semi-bros , and completely talentless wanna- be -bros have made everything about THEMSELVES and not the song or lyric at all. I don’t wanna LOOK at a song ..I wanna HEAR a song..HEAR a strong , timeless and universal lyric . I don’t care how good or not-so-good an artist is or isn’t ….how big his smile is , how he shakes his ass , how short HER skirt is , how big HER chest is , where they are from or what their roots are . I want to HEAR an artist who can serve/interpret a GREAT country lyric whether they wrote it, co-wrote it or had it pitched to them. POP music is about all of those other things ….throwaway , meaningless dance floor fluff to attract an audience who is only looking for that . COUNTRY music was the last bastion of the well-written , potentially classic song lyric . Not any more.
July 16, 2015 @ 8:19 am
Yes Albert, you are not alone. That’s why you can hear a Merle Haggard song from 40 years ago while you are driving down the road or sitting on the beach and still be transported to another place and time. Moved to tears, feel a lump in your throat, or feel like you are watching a documentary about someone else life in faded color… No matter how many times you hear those songs, they never get old and they can still do what they were intended to do… I think you may never see the likes of which again. I cant imagine anyone retreating into this Bro Country music 20-30-40 years from now and taking a trip far away. I just don’t see it happening when so many of us dont even want to take that trip today.
July 16, 2015 @ 9:48 am
Music, like a lot of things, has become a brand, not a product. Look at video games!!! The Xbox whatever and the new playstation are so hotly contested when they have almost the same library of games; it has become about the brand, not the games. I still have my Nintendo 64, it didn’t have as many different games as the original playstation, but the games it did have were completely unique. Luke and Jason are completely interchangeable, and the difference is down to “brand” and not product. Somebody like Josh Turner still markets his material as a product, and not himself as a brand.
July 16, 2015 @ 10:10 am
I find the term “product” to describe music or the arts as being offensive, as would most artists. Real artists don’t do what they do to create a product. They do it for the sake of the art.
July 16, 2015 @ 12:06 pm
“Real artists don”™t do what they do to create a product. They do it for the sake of the art.”
They key words here Jim are ” real artists ” . There are few if any real artists on country radio . They are mostly all employees peddling the company ‘ product ‘ and changing it up as the company and public demands them to . Like a breakfast cereal company . ” Hey ..let’s add blueberries to those flakes…everybody else is and people are into blueberries this week ” .
July 16, 2015 @ 12:39 pm
I think you missed my point Jim, so let me put it a different way. Michael Bay makes a lot of money making films that are generally considered pretty bad by most serious film enthusiasts. People go and see them because the franchises he humiliates are classic franchises like Transformers and Ninja Turtles that have been around. Luke and Jason don’t have to sell music, they have to sell themselves and people buy the music, no different than Mikel Knight. They create an image, a state of being that people find cool, and then people buy the music as a means of buying into the image. the music has become a product. Somebody like Josh T, Chris Thile, Cannonball Adderly or Split Lip Rayfield create music, and advertise music, not themselves. Luke advertises himself.
October 14, 2015 @ 8:22 am
Albert, that makes me think of the fact that Kitty Wells was a housewife and mother of three, over 30, when she had her hit “It Wasn’t God Who Made Honky Tonk Angels”. Neither was she “hot”, she looked like the homemaker that she was. Merle was no GQ cover, neither were many of the male legends of country but oh my stars, who gave a hoot when they could, with their voices, their words, and their instruments, just reach down into you and twist your heart, making you feel what they were singing/playing even if you’d never spent your own life holding down a bar stool or mining coal, or driven a long-haul truck, or had done time, or picked cotton, or had your spouse cheat on you or walk out on you and the kids. They made you understand, just a little, maybe a lot, what that really felt like.
I’ve actually noticed the same thing about a lot of the rock legends-they weren’t anyone’s idea of Prince Charming (Rick Wakeman, anyone?), but who cared when they could make those sounds!
July 16, 2015 @ 6:06 pm
This website has gone to shit. This “open letter” is one of the many reason. Instead of hating on modern country music how about you just don’t acknowledge it and instead spread more word on people like Sturgill Simpson, Jason Isbell, John Morland, Parker Millsap, The Easy Leaves, and others. Stop being an asshole because nobody on that part of the realm gives two shits or one fuck about your shitty articles.
July 16, 2015 @ 6:45 pm
If you’d read the letter, you’d know that’s exactly what I did, and in a way that will spread the name recognition of important independent country guys more than all the puff pieces that only amount to preaching to the choir ever could.
Luke Bryan gave enough of a shit to respond publicly and give multiple interviews apologizing about his words now. We’re making a difference. Who gives a shit what the reactionary haters in the “scene” care about? If you want to go around trying to convince people I haven’t done my part to spread the word about Jason Isbll, Sturgill Simpson, and tons of other worthy artists, best of luck. Why didn’t you leave this comment on the Jason Isbell feature I just posted?
July 18, 2015 @ 7:05 pm
Sorry Bud. I have to go with trigger on this one.
Im from Leander Texas. It’s a place where we take so so much pride in our culture, especially our brand of country music (Texas country/Red Dirt music). While some of our musical artists can be hokey or lacking in substance, the vast majority I’d give two guns up. The music that’s made down here can make you feel ALIVE.
You’ll probably never understand how amazing it was to be able to listen to the whole show of Ryan Bingham live at gruene hall on the radio, or have the opporotunity to listen to Ray Hubbard introduce a new artist every day to your ears on koke Fm. But i do have that and i am so Damn thankful. So thankful that i have the option to listen to a great radio station, in a great state that caters to individuals that like the clasics as well as wonderful younger artists like Aaron watson, Jason Boland, Hayes Carl, and many more.
Unfortunately once you get outside of Texas and Oklahoma… that all disappears. It is a baron wasteland where Nashville and it’s “stars” bend you over and give you all 10 inches with no lube. This is a slight exaduration of course. There are the occasional skattered songs here and there that squeek into the top 100 polished pop country cap list. Regardless, i can’t begin to imagine the pain of music fans out there that are having to sit back and watch Florida Georgia line commit genocide to country music without a second option out there for them.
While trigger is definitely giving some back handed comments about Luke it could be a whole lot worse. A WHOLE LOT WORSE. But he held back with country music’s best interests in mind, trying to find a solution to its deterioration and to help those who aren’t so fortunate as us south of the red river.
July 16, 2015 @ 8:34 pm
If yu can’t say anything nice,dont say anything thing at all.yu people are just jealous.Luke has a lot of heartache in his life he sings of happy times not depressing things.get a life people.Have anyone of yu ever listened to country music?
July 17, 2015 @ 4:38 am
I know you are just trolling and normally I would ignore your comments.
But seriously, at least try and spell/form a competent sentence. If you are going to troll, put some damn effort behind it at least….
July 17, 2015 @ 5:15 am
Haven’t you ever heard of Lil Dale? Mike W isn’t as good as he is yet but he has to practice. Right Dale?
The Hodgepodge: Is Country Music at the Point of No Return? | Country Perspective
July 23, 2015 @ 8:01 am
[…] at Saving Country Music penned a letter to Luke Bryan encouraging Bryan, arguably the biggest name in mainstream country right now, to step up and show […]
July 24, 2015 @ 1:23 pm
@ Trigger
I have taken this liberty of offering to you, and displaying for internet posterity, my comments upon some of your recent and past commentary. You wrote that you “wanted to post this open letter, to talk to Luke Bryan man to man,” yet not long ago you wanted to talk to Luke Bryan, “[M]an to metrosexual country douche,” after having proclaimed that Luke Bryan “indeed has a vagina.” In this letter you betray your shit-talking, tough-guy put-on, and portray your Luke Bryan-vagina-sucking-true-persona. In a shameful display of grandiosity, you attempt to ameliorate your two-faced hypocrisy by having your readers associate your venally narcissistic diatribes of hate to occasions “when Comedy Central puts on a roast of a celebrity.” You wrote that you wanted “to ride above all the satire and simply talk about the issues and the circumstances surrounding them,” yet as the lone individual having butt cheeks firmly affixed to the swayback stead of satire you simply surround and drown the issues and circumstances. You wrote that “[i]f people don”™t want to take this letter seriously, then so be it. But it comes from the heart, and that”™s the best I can do.” I, for one, believe that you are capable of doing much more. I also believe that someday you”™ll take my comments to that heart of yours, once you reach around and pull it out of your ass.
July 24, 2015 @ 2:07 pm
“after having proclaimed that Luke Bryan “indeed has a vagina.””
Ha! If you think that I proclaimed that Luke Bryan had a vagina, then the joke’s on you. Sarcasm wouldn’t be as funny if everyone got it.
The only reason you would land on this particular post is if you were looking for something to bitch about based off of preconceived notions of who I am, and what I do. Why here? Why Now? This thread has been dead for a week.
“I, for one, believe that you are capable of doing much more. I also believe that someday you”™ll take my comments to that heart of yours, once you reach around and pull it out of your ass.”
Well, it’s good to know you still have a little faith in me.
July 24, 2015 @ 8:42 pm
“Why here?” Because you”™re here. “Why Now?” And why necrothread? Because at this particular time, the circumstances of my life”™s schedule and routines made it convenient for me to take the time to express an opinion which I had developed over several months of reading your creatively expressive reviews and commentary.
We disagree as to whether or not you proclaimed that Luke Bryan “indeed has a vagina.” I find support for my statement in your June 11, 2012 article entitled “Luke Bryan Loses ‘Male Video’ Award for Having a Vagina”. I suppose that you would have me, and others of your reader base, overlook the glaring look of your headline and believe, for a second time, that since you claimed in the body of that article that “Bryan finally put the suspicion to rest by revealing that he indeed has a vagina,” that it was Luke Bryan and not you making the vaginal proclamation. Yeah, if you find it convenient and useful to replace historical fact with reinvented rhetoric, then the joke”™s on me.
“The only reason you would land on this particular post is if you were looking for something to bitch about based off of preconceived notions of who I am, and what I do.” I have a different reason. I don”™t look for things to bitch about. I have not conceived a notion of who you are. Unfortunately I don”™t know you. I have based my comments upon my experiences of reading your words, not upon who you are. And finally, from your bully pulpit you summarily dismiss my comments through your own preconceived notion challenging my reasoning and motive, while erroneously projecting your claims of preconception upon me. For a person sensitive to the importance of “who I am, and what I do,” I find it remarkable that you, a person of considerable power and persuasiveness, would consistently utilize such power and persuasiveness to grammatically beat people down for who they are and for what they do. Thus, I remarked.
And yes, I have faith in you.